I'm sorry, some of this sounds comforting and nice, but I see flaws in these concepts.
First off, we are not animal-man. Animals have souls as we do, but they do not have a spirit. Our spiritual nature is dead when we are born, the spiritual part of us with ability to commune with God. Sin was imputed to mankind through Adam and Eve and so we are born with this defect.
When we are born-again, we become a new creature, alive in Christ, a spiritual person and we become the Temple of the Holy Spirit.
We came from God and are made in His image. The soul is the mind, emotions, will, and whatever special talents and abilities He gives us. God has a soul, but God is spirit.
There is confusion and mystery about the soul/spirit of man and I do not pretend to know all there is, but I think I know more than this Ms. Valtorta who wrote this. She was a creative and imaginative romantic writer and her writings should be viewed as such, NOT EXTENSIONS OF SCRIPTURE!
Ms. Valtorta, the writer of "The Poem of the Man-God", was a Catholic and leaned on her faith, knowledge of Catholism ... and supposed visions, which are somewhat spurios. "Visions of Mary"? Why would God give anyone visions of Mary?
Quote [Valtorta's handwritten episodes (which had no chronological order) were typed into separate pages by her priest and reassembled as a book.
[2] The first copy of the book was presented to Pope
Pius XII, and the three
Servite priests who attended the 1948 papal audience stated that he gave his verbal approval to "publish this work as is; he who reads will understand."
[2] However, the
Holy Office forbade publication and, when in spite of that prohibition, publication followed, placed the book on the
Index of Forbidden Books.
[3]
In 1992, at the request of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith,
Cardinal Dionigi Tettamanzi asked the publisher to ensure that "in any future reprint of the volumes, each should, right from its first page, clearly state that the 'visions' and 'dictations' referred to in it cannot be held to be of supernatural origin but must be considered simply as literary forms used by the author to narrate in her own way the life of Jesus".[4] The publisher maintained that this was an implicit declaration that the work was free of doctrinal or moral error.[5]] Wikepedia