you can assume that if you like, i mean it even sounds good, but i suggest you are making connections working backward from a conclusion, which has been assumed. There is only One Yah, and Yah is Who we are called to worship exclusively, Scripture on request. Bam worship Jesus and ignore the tone of the occurrences in Scripture of humans, Two Greeks, etc, doing that, but wadr your stating that as if you know does not make it so.
You might at least contemplate the connections to that belief system and the Cult of Sol Invictus from which it derives, and you can even google "Mithraism and..." which will autocomplete for "Christianity" since like a billion people have already figured it out. Apparently pretty much everybody starts out with a Jesus as Apollos, basically.
But isn't everything regarding scripture should be shown by the actual scripture? I mean there are so many Bible versions and they are not all saying the same thing for which I would need to know how you read those verses exactly and what Bible version it was from, yes? I share from the KJV, but I do not know from which you are referencing from which I suspect was paraphrasing the meaning. I have done that on occasions but I cite the reference so readers will know where I got that meaning from even if they are not using my Bible version.
It's kind of like trying to get on the same page in order to know how the other is reading the scripture and applying it too. So if you do not mind, could you please cite the scriptural reference for your quote of "Who
alone lives in unapproachable light,"? Thanks in advance.
zing!
sorry, its the satans dialectic, the "this is that and that is this," although that is no excuse
anyway, i doubt you would much like the Scripture i would be Quoting, ok, and everyone else is surely tired of it, which is why i suggested searching the mithraism deal, and decide for yourself. prolly like a billion on the satans/naive dialectic too btw
That zinger applies to you and me, if you noted that I included me as well. Sorry if that provoked you to continue our conversation of which I know it is on the Lord Jesus Christ to make it happen.
Hebrews 10:23 Let us hold fast the profession of our faith without wavering; (for he is faithful that promised;) 24 And let us consider one another to provoke unto love and to good works: 25 Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some is; but exhorting one another: and so much the more, as ye see the day approaching.
As for quoting the scriptures, who cares if I do not like it if it is the truth? So feel free to cite the reference and the Bible version you are using so we can both study in the word, relying on the Lord to cause the increase.
and, fwiw, you might be more inclined to live chat? sometimes i have to think/not think for a day or so myself :)
Well, when an answer is not forthcoming, or thinking about an issue with Him, I would think the Lord would lead me to do the same.
How do you know that John 18:14 isn't John reporting how and why the people were incited to crucify Jesus as Caiaphas was behind it? He still had to find a charge to convict Him at His trial and failing that, he finally asked Him if He was God, and he got the answer he wanted to condemn him. Later, when the choice was for the people to decide Barabbas or Jesus, John 18:14 would show who was responsible for having agents of Caiaphas inciting the people to choose Barabbas over Jesus as Caiaphas foresaw the custom coming for this to happen.
John 18:39 But ye have a custom, that I should release unto you one at the passover: will ye therefore that I release unto you the King of the Jews? 40 Then cried they all again, saying, Not this man, but Barabbas. Now Barabbas was a robber.
I am not sure why you licked that verse, but I believe the point John was mentioning it earlier was how he was behind this plot for why the people behaved the way that they did, but in no way could he have done this, unless Jesus outrightly answer the question that He was & is God..
didnt He also plainly delineate the relationship in the passage? look in a sense that might even be correct, when Jesus of Nazareth is understood as "John Doe from Nowhere," and I said "you are elohim" and even greater things will you do and even pick up your cross and follow Me are recognized, the High Priest/Priest relationship is recognized iow, but i dont think Jesus worship is th way to go. although it is popular, yes
Still need that scriptural reference for "you are Elohim" to find it in my KJV Bible, brother.
As for "greater things will you do" could very well point to when believers have inherited the first fruits of the resurrection for we know not the glory that awaits us in the Lord. Obviously, no disciple in the Book of Acts had cast any mountain into the sea yet so... probably referring to the glorified resurrected state we shall inherit providing we looked to Him to help us lay aside every weight & sin in running that race for that prize.
yes, and Yah said "you" are, and if you are truly in the relationship you believe you are in with "Jesus" then why pick up your own cross, and follow? Wouldnt that be blasphemy? pretending to be Yah?
The "pick up your cross and follow Me" can be taken as to "how" we can follow Him;
Luke 9:23 And he said to them all, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily, and follow me.0
As in, I deny myself as able to follow Him as it is not in my will power or religious strength to follow Him. If I could not save myself and had to surrender from doing so to believe in Jesus Christ that I am saved so I can rest in Him, then to continue in His rest and that love, I am to look to Him for the power to follow Him as it is "not I who live but Christ Who lives in me" for how I can trust Him as my Good Shepherd to help me to follow Him when He said "Follow Me". If anyone asks you today to "follow me" you are pretty much trusting your welfare to him.
Galatians 2:16 Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified. 17 But if, while we seek to be justified by Christ, we ourselves also are found sinners, is therefore Christ the minister of sin? God forbid. 18 For if I build again the things which I destroyed, I make myself a transgressor. 19 For I through the law am dead to the law, that I might live unto God. 20 I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me. 21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.
So Jesus is the author & finisher of our faith to help us run that race to His glory for why the crowns we receive are His crowning achievements in us. That is how we get to know Him and the power of His resurrection when we rely on Him for everything in living that reconciled relationship with God thru Jesus Christ.
and fwiw i guess many believers use the I am passage to support Jesus' declaring Himself Yah, yes, but imo obviously Jesus was being misunderstood, and did not mean what they heard, but even if He did, that they may be one as we are one
The Jews grew up with scripture to know what came across as blasphemy or not. When the O.T. says that there is no one beside me and yet Jesus said He is at the right hand of God the Father, they saw it as blasphemy but in reality, Jesus was declaring His deity as one with the Father.