- Jul 13, 2013
- 1,048
- 63
- 0
Webers_Home said:In other words: it was Mandela's personal conviction that Jesus
couldn't be 110% trusted with the safety of his sheep; not even the
safety of the sheep that Jesus' Father entrusts to his care.
Dodo_David said:What evidence do you have that your above-quoted claim is true?
What is forbidden on this website are attacks on people and on branches of the universal Church.Webers_Home said:I'm sorry Dave; but the information you seek is forbidden on Christianity
Board. I tried posting it twice before and got in trouble over it: remember?
Buen Camino
/
For example, suppose that someone claimed that others are going to Hell because they are Methodists. If such a claim were made, then it would be a violation of site rules.
For another example, suppose that someone claimed that others are going to Hell if they reject the controversial doctrine of "Once Saved, Always Saved". If such a claim were made, then it would be a violation of site rules.
As long as one isn't violating this website's rules by attacking people and branches of the universal Church (as illustrated in the above examples), one should have no problem explaining why one believes that Nelson Mandela is going to Hell.
So, what is the evidence that "it was Mandela's personal conviction that Jesus couldn't be 110% trusted with the safety of his sheep; not even the safety of the sheep that Jesus' Father entrusts to his care"?