Yeah some people call it the most embarrassing line in scripture.I was not stating what I believe, but what most seem to believe is not true. Most would say that no one of that generation saw Him coming in the clouds, so that is not actually true; and Him coming "soon" didn't seem to happen, so they say that is not actually true; and most don't believe that all that He described "must shortly take place", never took place "shortly."
I believe it did take place shorty.
The point was, you too have given Jesus a pass when it would appear the things He said did not come to pass, but you now have a double standard for anyone else saying something that cannot be proved by you seeing it come to pass.
Well who do I trust? Jesus, or you yourself? Should I place my faith in Joseph Smith? or ScottA?
I believe by faith. Does that personally bother you? I believe faithfully that in that generation he came.
I like how we have documented historical records at least of the destruction of Jerusalem.
I believe the church bride of Christ whom was governed by the Apostles, seen him come... faithfully.
Without evidence. That makes a lot of people mad, but people can't override "faith" and how one puts into practice.
Meanwhile, I have the answers to all that and more--from God, but you have this double standard keeping you from not receiving what is written as coming when the times are fulfilled...just like Israel did.
You have the answers from God. If you say so, I don't believe you do. I am not gonna put my faith in ScottA.
It's just that you are adamantly stating things you believe that are not true--while what is actually true was sealed and yet promised to come just before the end.
And if you knew where you were, you would not be "fine with it."
I believe by faith, man. If that upsets you, I don't know what to tell you. You're not gonna change my mind, Ive done made it up for myself.
Last edited: