Ziggy
Well-Known Member
The Bible has both Old and New Covenants.
Was this put together under one cover to cause division?
Or was it put together as a whole picture of the journey of God's relationship with man?
There are Jewish bibles which don't have the New Testament attached.
Ther are Christian bibles that don't have the Old Testament attached.
It's like having the Constitution without the Bill of Rights.
The New Testament is taught from the Old.
The Old is foundation of Man.
The New is the Foundation of Christ.
The first is the obligation to the government of Man.
The second is the obligation to the government of God.
The Constitution is the foundation of the laws of the country under Man.
The Bill of Rights is the foundation of our Freedoms under God.
Mat 13:52
Then said he unto them, Therefore every scribe which is instructed unto the kingdom of heaven is like unto a man that is an householder, which bringeth forth out of his treasure things new and old.
Who scribed the scriptures, both Old and New?
Who's word is it?
What would happen if we removed the Constitution and said it's dead, it's not relevant for today (they are trying to do that by the way)
And simply keep the Bill of rights?
Would we still have a country? Who would run it? By who's standards?
The Old Testament is the basic structure and functions of a church.
The structure of the government Head is God, Spokesman or President is Moses, Priesthood is Aaron, the people are the clergy or the congregation.
We see this same structure in most churches in the world.
The Structure of the Church Head is Christ, Spokesman is the Bishop or the Pastor, Priesthood belongs to Christ. And the people are the learners and the helpers in the church.
The Constitution or the basic structure of both the Old and New Testaments remain the same. But the positions of authority have changed.
The basic structure of the family follows suit. The Head of the man is Christ, the head of the family is the man, the instruction giver is the woman, and the children obey their parents.
The New Testament is like the Bill of Rights that is added to the Constitution.
It teaches us our rights and freedoms under the Constitution or the basic Structure of the church.
These rights can be found in the Constitution or the Old Testament. But what's missing is the Freedom.
The Freedoms are found in the New Testament.
Under the Old Testament the Rights of the people are given by the Law and by Moses.
Under the New Testament the Rights and Freedoms are given by The Spirit of God and by Christ.
There would be no Bill of rights without the Constitution. There would be no New Testament without the Old Testament.
Our Country, The United States of America is built on the structure of the Government according to God.
We are a Christian Nation.
No matter who tells you different. The basic structure is the proof.
Hugs
Was this put together under one cover to cause division?
Or was it put together as a whole picture of the journey of God's relationship with man?
There are Jewish bibles which don't have the New Testament attached.
Ther are Christian bibles that don't have the Old Testament attached.
It's like having the Constitution without the Bill of Rights.
The New Testament is taught from the Old.
The Old is foundation of Man.
The New is the Foundation of Christ.
The first is the obligation to the government of Man.
The second is the obligation to the government of God.
The Constitution is the foundation of the laws of the country under Man.
The Bill of Rights is the foundation of our Freedoms under God.
Mat 13:52
Then said he unto them, Therefore every scribe which is instructed unto the kingdom of heaven is like unto a man that is an householder, which bringeth forth out of his treasure things new and old.
Who scribed the scriptures, both Old and New?
Who's word is it?
What would happen if we removed the Constitution and said it's dead, it's not relevant for today (they are trying to do that by the way)
And simply keep the Bill of rights?
Would we still have a country? Who would run it? By who's standards?
Difference Between Constitution and Bill of Rights
A constitution is a document that establishes the basic structure and functions of a government, while a bill of rights is a section of a constitution that protects the rights and freedoms of its citizens.The Old Testament is the basic structure and functions of a church.
The structure of the government Head is God, Spokesman or President is Moses, Priesthood is Aaron, the people are the clergy or the congregation.
We see this same structure in most churches in the world.
The Structure of the Church Head is Christ, Spokesman is the Bishop or the Pastor, Priesthood belongs to Christ. And the people are the learners and the helpers in the church.
The Constitution or the basic structure of both the Old and New Testaments remain the same. But the positions of authority have changed.
The basic structure of the family follows suit. The Head of the man is Christ, the head of the family is the man, the instruction giver is the woman, and the children obey their parents.
The New Testament is like the Bill of Rights that is added to the Constitution.
It teaches us our rights and freedoms under the Constitution or the basic Structure of the church.
These rights can be found in the Constitution or the Old Testament. But what's missing is the Freedom.
The Freedoms are found in the New Testament.
Under the Old Testament the Rights of the people are given by the Law and by Moses.
Under the New Testament the Rights and Freedoms are given by The Spirit of God and by Christ.
There would be no Bill of rights without the Constitution. There would be no New Testament without the Old Testament.
Our Country, The United States of America is built on the structure of the Government according to God.
We are a Christian Nation.
No matter who tells you different. The basic structure is the proof.
Hugs