Couple of things here to consider:
1. I don't subscribe to the man-made, erroneous doctrine of Sola Scriptura, nowhere supported in Scripture. But, yes, I can defend the Church's doctrines from Scripture. Not as you personally interpret them, but as the original authors of Scripture intended them to be interpreted. St. Peter nixes personal interpretation of Scripture with regard to creating doctrine in 2 Peter 1:20-21.
“Sola scriptura“ finds great support in Jesus‘ teachings. “It is written” was a reference to scripture made by Jesus on many occasions. The apostles too quoted from scripture in their teachings, always reflecting the source of their instruction as coming from Jehovah…the author of all inspired scripture. (2 Tim 3:16-17)
Nowhere was “the church” given authority to override scripture or to change what it said to suit their own adopted doctrines.
2. The Catholic Church preceeded the New Testament in writing. It was members of the Catholic Church that wrote the New Testament and, later, in the late 4th century, decided which books belonged in the New Testament and which ones did not, out of the more than 300 it analyzed.
So antiquity justifies the claim that the RCC wrote the New Testament? What a joke!
It is God’s word, and no matter who God used to bring it into existence, it remains God’s word, not the work of a corrupted church system. Not a single word was penned by a member of the Catholic church. Nor did they choose any of it…..what it contains is by God’s will, not man’s.
You do understand that God can use even his enemies to bring about the doing of his will…..like ancient Babylon was used to conquer unfaithful Israel and take its members into captivity for 70 years. Yet God later destroyed Babylon for her own iniquities.
Using the Catholic church to deliver his word concerning the Christian scriptures, was not a mark of approval, since God’s will is not a matter of man qualifying to be used by him…..his will can be carried out using whomever is in the current position to bring it about.
By the 4th century, Christianity was so far removed from Bible truth, as not to resemble the original in any way.
Unless one is indoctrinated from birth to assume that Roman Catholicism is “Christianity”, they would never do so after studying the Bible and seeing for themselves that no Catholic doctrine is supported by scripture….no wonder they reject sola scriptura! How dare anyone assume that God’s word should be the final authority on all things.
All I've seen you do is give your personal interpretation of Scripture. That means you think you are your own Pope, with the infallibility God gave the position, with regard to creating doctrine. Isn't that sort of hypocritical?
And that there is truly funny…where will I find a pope in the Bible who was infallible? A man they call “holy father”…..who is a sinful as any other human being, and who lives in a palace and is served by others.…a place with enormous wealth, yet the major population in the RCC live in poverty…..did Jesus ever accept such a title? Wasn’t it Jesus who said
“call no man your Father on earth for one is your Father, the heavenly one”. (Matt 23:9) Did Jesus live in a palace…..wasn’t he born in a stable to poor parents?
Didn’t he tell his disciples to share what they had with their brothers? In original Christianity, no one was in need because all shared what they had with their brothers. (Acts 4:32-35)
How many beggars are on the steps of the Vatican? Why are they ignored like the Pharisees ignored the poor beggars in their day? How many people show up at Lourdes expecting a miracle, that never happens?
Seriously? How do you hang on to such deception?
Rather than assume what Catholics believe, why don't you ask for an explanation, or at least ask what the Catholic doctrines really are, rather than posting accusations based on untruths and inaccuracies?
I have studied the Bible with many Catholic people who were appalled by the number of things they were taught by their church that find absolutely NO support in the Bible, yet they were led to believe that what their church teaches is the truth……sadly, there is not an once of truth in it. They were happy to leave.
So over to you now Augustin56….direct from God’s word…..
Show us in the scriptures where Mary is ever called the “mother of God”, and how she attained her “immaculate conception”.
Show us where there was ever a pope given infallibility to lead the church….
Show us where there were priests officiating at alters in grand structures with opulent trappings, in original Christianity?
Show us the grand titles and distinctive garments that were worn by the apostles…?
Show us purgatory and hellfire, used to keep the ignorant peasants in fear?
Show us justification for the idolatry seen in church practice.
Show us where any man on earth can give absolution for sins, confessed in a box.
Show us holy water and repetitious prayers using a rosary.
Then show us the role of the grand inquisitor….and by whose authority he was made the judge of a person’s eternal future. One source says that it has been estimated by careful and reputed historians of the Catholic Inquisition that 50 million people were slaughtered for the crime of "heresy" by Roman persecutors between the A.D. 606 and the middle of the 19th century.
That is a lot of bloodguilt…..(Isa 1:15)
I am following your advice and asking for an explanation…..
We will await your confirmation of all these things from God’s word, which you say is a product of the RCC.
Please remember that people’s lives are dependent on those who put themselves forward as teachers of God’s word….they are doubly accountable for what they teach because of that.