Davy
Well-Known Member
But the "another beast" of Rev.13:11-14, which is pointing to a person, is... the "dragon", i.e., Satan, or The Antichrist (which means the 'in place of Christ').All those show is that satan is separate from the beast (a kingdom) and separate from rthe3 second beast (also known as the AC).
Yes all three are separate. There is no way to make a kingdom (the first beast(into a man. There's only one man who is found in all passages dealing with the one we commonly call the AC.
If the ten horned beast in Daniel isn't a person, nor is the ten horned beast in Rev. Neither is the AC. The AC is always the next one introduced who rules the ten horned beast. In Daniel it is the little horn. In Rev it is the beast with two little horns. It shouldn't be difficult unless a false doctrine is defended.
The 'beast' label is used 2 ways in Revelation.
1. for a beast kingdom (which is the subject of the ten horns, seven heads, ten crowns, like you say).
2. for a beast 'king', which is about the one who has 2 horns 'like' a lamb (Jesus), but speaks as a dragon (Satan). Per Rev.9, Satan is that 'king', and angel of the bottomless pit, and also is the beast of Rev.11 that ascends out of the bottomless pit to kill God's two witnesses in Jerusalem at the end.
The "little horn" prophecy in the Book of Daniel is about No.2 above, the 'beast king' idea. He represents the Antichrist for the end, and comes up among the ten horns, which is revealed even in Revelation 17.
But men's doctrines confuse that "another beast" part with trying to push into it another entity like the "false prophet", when the mere 'idea'... of a beast and false prophet are simply ROLES, or CHARACTERS which Satan will play as the "another beast" king, working great signs, wonders, and miracles, raining fire down from heaven to earth in the sight of men.