Hi
Is there anyone here that is a lawyer or familiar with laws/rights, that can answer this question:
If the government or United Nations had evidence/proof of the existence of God (that would convince even the most skeptical of atheists/critics),
Do we have a right to have access to that information (the evidence/proofs that they are withholding from Public Domain)?
This is on legal basis of damages incurred as a result of WITHOLDING that information: that had you had access to that evidence/information that they are sitting on, that you WOULD have been converted (and thus "saved" from Hell).
And as for the damages incurred:
But as a result of them withholding that information from the public, you (or your relatives/friends/etc) that COULD have been converted/saved from Hell during that time period, failed to do so.
Resulting in you (or your relatives/friends/etc that have ALREADY died) spending rest of eternity suffering in Hell, which you wouldn't have, had the government made that information available to the public.
Basically the equivalent of the government deliberately sitting on, and withholding "lifesaving/soulsaving" information.
While at the same time, THEY benefitted from having access to that information THEMSELVES (having been converted, thus having their "soul/life" saved).
An anology would be the equivalent of the government sitting on a cure for cancer, but decided to deliberately withhold that cure from the general public, and instead deciding to just keep it for THEMSELVES, and make use of it for THEMSELVES. While excluding everyone else from being able to access it.
Is there anyone here that is a lawyer or familiar with laws/rights, that can answer this question:
If the government or United Nations had evidence/proof of the existence of God (that would convince even the most skeptical of atheists/critics),
Do we have a right to have access to that information (the evidence/proofs that they are withholding from Public Domain)?
This is on legal basis of damages incurred as a result of WITHOLDING that information: that had you had access to that evidence/information that they are sitting on, that you WOULD have been converted (and thus "saved" from Hell).
And as for the damages incurred:
But as a result of them withholding that information from the public, you (or your relatives/friends/etc) that COULD have been converted/saved from Hell during that time period, failed to do so.
Resulting in you (or your relatives/friends/etc that have ALREADY died) spending rest of eternity suffering in Hell, which you wouldn't have, had the government made that information available to the public.
Basically the equivalent of the government deliberately sitting on, and withholding "lifesaving/soulsaving" information.
While at the same time, THEY benefitted from having access to that information THEMSELVES (having been converted, thus having their "soul/life" saved).
An anology would be the equivalent of the government sitting on a cure for cancer, but decided to deliberately withhold that cure from the general public, and instead deciding to just keep it for THEMSELVES, and make use of it for THEMSELVES. While excluding everyone else from being able to access it.
Last edited: