Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
That's irrelevant. Call it whatever you like but it's still there, punishment in the fire, several times in the NT. You can't translate it out of the NT.Please read post 212 to has the answer to the first time you quoted luke 16 the word used is Hades
So what??? It's still going in the Lake of Fire and all those therein. They will be there, forever.now look what happens to Hades in Rev 20:14 if your bible choice doesn't say hades but hell instead look the word up in Strong's.
Totally irrelevant! Punishment in the fire is VERY NT.Thats where most of the problem lies, most translate Hades, Gehenna and Tartarus as one word in English Hell. I know it means little to you but I've studied this topic for a long time.
Really?The OT never indicates eternal torment it always indicates death.
Which is referring to spiritual death, I.E. in need of salvation.Just as did God in Gen 2:17
Yes there is.Secondly their is no clear distinction in the new covenant that now men will be eternally tormented.
2 Corinthians 11:13-15 (NKJV)Wohlberg goes over nearly every instance in the NT.
Maybe some of them will get saved.Besides all that I don't believe in all that I have read and know in the HS that God will have an eternal BBQ pit burning with the souls of the lost in it forever. Won't that make for a fine conversation piece at a picnic with the kids.
Jude 1:6-7 (NKJV)I just want to add that there are two options,
1] the word of God contradicts itself you will die vs you will be tormented forever.
2] We are miss understanding the message.
Now I never and never will accept choice 1the bible contradicts itself
Yes there is.
Matthew 25:41 (NKJV)
[sup]41 [/sup]Then He will also say to those on the left hand, 'Depart from Me, you cursed, into the EVERLASTING FIRE prepared for the devil and his angels:
Jude 1:6-7 (NKJV)
[sup]6 [/sup]And the angels who did not keep their proper domain, but left their own abode, He has reserved in EVERLASTING CHAINS under darkness for the judgment of the great day; [sup]7 [/sup]as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities around them in a similar manner to these, having given themselves over to sexual immorality and gone after strange flesh, are set forth as an example, suffering the vengeance of ETERNAL FIRE.
I do understand. This verse uses the exact same Greek word for everlasting and eternal. If everlasting punishment doesn't mean forever then neither does eternal life mean forever.Like I said ether the NT contradicts itself or your misunderstanding the message.
Are you intentionally distorting God's Word? It doesn't say He will. It says He is able.Mt 10:28...............this one indicates that God can and will destroy souls "Words of Jesus as well"
I do understand. This verse uses the exact same Greek word for everlasting and eternal. If everlasting punishment doesn't mean forever then neither does eternal life mean forever.
Matthew 25:46 (NKJV)
[sup]46 [/sup]And these will go away into everlasting punishment, but the righteous into eternal life."
Are you intentionally distorting God's Word? It doesn't say He will. It says He is able.
Naughty naughty.
As I said earlier, those who deny eternal Hell are prime candidates for eternal Hell.I growing rather tired of playing this game.
As Dennis the Menace would say, I think your picking up the gauntlet for your old pal Mr Texus.
You seem to have an anger problem.Didn't you get enough of me in the image of God thread?. I'm so sick of your smart remarks and your ability to ignore every effort to reason with you.
you seem to function as a parasite sucking away every reasonable attempt to communicate with you. Until all am left with is to tell you to @#^$#. Get it?![]()
Can't it be both?1] the word of God contradicts itself you will die vs you will be tormented forever.
I have found it to be quite common for cults to deny eternal punishment and that Jesus is God Almighty. Does the shoe fit?I growing rather tired of playing this game.
As Dennis the Menace would say, I think your picking up the gauntlet for your old pal Mr Texus.
I have found it to be quite common for cults to deny eternal punishment and that Jesus is God Almighty. Does the shoe fit?
There's just one of me.Why you two are quite a pair................... a regular Dathan and Abiram coming out and standing at the door of their tents,
John 1 The Word was God. The Word became flesh and dwelt among us ...Jesus always testified of the Father and asked Him to send the Holy Spirit.
Is that a threat?I doubt that If we were standing face to face you could define cult.![]()
Is that a threat?
Why don't you just keep your insults that you can't prove? I quote God's Word. I don't need Google for the forum.LOLno Mr Ducky, The implication is face to face you don't know............ But sitting at your computer you can google an answer.
Why don't you just keep your insults that you can't prove? I quote God's Word. I don't need Google for the forum.
Was I right about you then? The cults have similar characteristics. Those are 2 very common ones. 'Cult' meaning religion without salvation.
Do you deny that Jesus is God Almighty?Cults in one way or another deny Christ, the next notable feature is salvation is impossible outside the group.
I don't deny Christ and I don't don't have a personal following.
You don't have to to qualify.I don't even affiliate myself with a denomination.
I am only responsible for my posts, not his. Stop blaming me for others' posts. I repeat, those who deny Jesus/God and eternal punishment are prime candidates for eternity in Hell.Also on the last page I suggested that you just say I disagree and let it rest. But you two insist on your own style of mocking instead, to which I'm happy to reply. You started with the cult implication as well. And as I suspected you don't know.
I don't have a "side kick". Wrong again.your side kick
Ducky, could we expect less?
Of course you'll get a smart ass response back after posting:
Yes indeed! That is truth.you
As I said earlier, those who deny eternal Hell are prime candidates for eternal Hell.
Another fact.Are you intentionally distorting God's Word? It doesn't say He will. It says He is able.
Naughty naughty.
Gee, did you just "slander" me?your buddy again
Ahhh, so no ability to answer again?
If you go back and look you and texas are the ones that start the smart remarks, then like most liken to yourselves, attempt to accuse me of being insulting when the going gets tough. I continued to try to present some evidence for a grown up discussion in reply to texas's smart remark supporting Foreigners request. Just go to the top of the page and look. Then tell me I started it. Its impossible for people like you to simply say I disagree, you would much rather slander.
Gee, did you just "slander" me?
Why don't you just say what's really eating you? Your unScriptural doctrines.I said............ Its impossible for people like you to simply say I disagree, you would much rather slander.
I've been dealing with it since page 4 my first post in this thread. This isn't my first rodeo I'm completely capable of responding to people that talk in circles. Its like watching a dog chase his tail.
Why don't you just say what's really eating you? Your unScriptural doctrines.
John 20:28-29 (NKJV)
[sup]28 [/sup]And Thomas answered and said to Him, "MY LORD AND MY GOD!" [sup]29 [/sup]Jesus said to him, "Thomas, because you have seen Me, you have believed. Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed."
And you accuse us of insults. Guess you haven't read the NT.Here's my dilemma
Proverbs 26
[sup]4[/sup] Do not answer a fool according to his folly,
Lest you also be like him.
[sup]5[/sup] Answer a fool according to his folly,
Lest he be wise in his own eyes.
What we have here is not contradiction, but dilemma—an indication that when it comes to answering fools, you cannot win—because they are fools, and there is no practical cure for foolery (as this citation demonstrates). So: It is unwise to argue with a fool at his own level and recognize his own foolish suppositions, but it is good sometimes to refute him soundly, lest his foolishness seem to be confirmed by your silence.
I do think its time to be silent, good night Mr Ducky
And you accuse us of insults. Guess you haven't read the NT.
Matthew 5:22 (NKJV)
[sup]22 [/sup] But whoever says, 'You fool!' shall be in danger of hell fire.
Ah, there's that Hell you don't believe in again.
Since Hell fire doesn't bother you, it probably doesn't matter, at least for now. Will later though. It will bother BILLIONS later who it doesn't bother at present.Didn't you ask me what was eating me? Your unScriptural doctrines.
I've been reading the thou shall not judge thread. Guess what everyone of us every day makes a decision regarding what someone says or does. Its really important in this forum about what people say. Now if you don't judge what others teach your a stick in the sea being tossed by every wave of doctrine.
Would you rather I call you an antagonist?
1. a person who is opposed to, struggles against, or competes with another; opponent; adversary. 2. the adversary of the hero or protagonist of a drama or other literary work: Iago is the antagonist of Othello.
The definition has the same meaning in Proverbs .....opponent..... advisory...
Fool
1. One who is deficient in judgment, sense, or understanding.2. One who acts unwisely on a given occasion:
It seems to be a better thing to call you a fool, the implication is you can't help it
On the other hand an antagonist has intention.
You take your pick