bbyrd009
Groper
- Nov 30, 2016
- 33,943
- 12,082
- 113
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- United States Minor Outlying Islands
ya, or something like that? Just…giving info that one cannot really hear yetToo intoxicating?
no son of man may die for another’s sins is in a couple places, but right out of the Bible, verbatimThis phrase you post so frequently has always troubled me in that it sounds like it's quoting the Bible and it's not, having subtly changed the actual thing that is said, so that it sounds like a refutation of a key element of Christianity
well…you say “Jesus died bc we sinned,” but see, you cannot really Quote that, absent “Christ” anyway, Christ died for our sins though. As for the rest, the penal substitution part, i dont know, but i do know that No son of man may die for another’s sins, x2 for a witness, and you should be interpreting that how you feel led imo; the best refute seems to be that Jesus, as a Son, was able to die for us bc we are not His father, but i find that pretty weak—Jesus is after all a spiritual “father” to us, imo"Die for another's sins", is that to be understood as meaning penal substitution? Do you mean in a causal sense? "Cursed is the ground for your sake", that is to say, "Cursed is the ground because of you". Jesus died because we sinned . . . And that was the way He could rescue us. Is it meant that way?
There is a certain ambiguity in your statement. And I can't go the Bible to clarify it, because that's not what it says. It says something similar, but not that.
well, the cult of sol was the leading religion of the day i guess, and it held that “afterlife” in the Elysian Fields was only for a select few, and i am 90% convinced that the NT was written with this belief in mind. Everyone else was considered “greys,” or what we might call “water,” or even “the sea” in Scriptural terms, but tbh it was what i learned from rabbis that had the most impact there.And the whole cult of sol thing, it's like, whenever we start to have what I feel is meaningful discussion . . . well, at the end of the day, I suspect my ideas of what you mean with that are completely off base
I should prolly stress again that cult of sol is not “bad” imo, Jesus gave some of the highest praise to the Roman Centurion, and i am in a “cult” imo right now, “cult” is not a bad word, i equate it with the Scriptural “tree,” or like “Oaks of Mamre,” wherein oaks are almost surely…not the best trees to be from, but the Bible seems to acknowledge that evabody gotta start somewhere. I forget where i picked up “oaks bad,” guess inshoulda held onto that one. Ps, “eagles” suck too i guess lol