Grailhunter
Well-Known Member
Four legs good, two legs bad...
To write that these extra Biblical works are designed to debunk the Bible is beyond nonsense. Why do you throw scholarship out the window in favor of your own closed mind?
How true
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Four legs good, two legs bad...
To write that these extra Biblical works are designed to debunk the Bible is beyond nonsense. Why do you throw scholarship out the window in favor of your own closed mind?
LOL Just information for you.
As far as linguistic information I recommend the Strong's. For your average person it is cheap and pretty accurate.
But it inherits all the errors of the KJV, because it is tied directly to it.
No harm, no foul. My ministry is to give truth....you do not believe it or do not like it....no offence.
Very little pressure on me...... Johnny Appleseed of Truth.....I plant the seeds.....I leave it up to God to go from there.
"Scholarship" must include the suckerfishes that claim Mark etc is a forgery.Four legs good, two legs bad...
To write that these extra Biblical works are designed to debunk the Bible is beyond nonsense. Why do you throw scholarship out the window in favor of your own closed mind?
Yes, these extra Biblical works are designed to debunk the Bible.
What a stupid thing to do to Christendom.
I guess these fellers that create these redefinitions are just tools of ....
"Scholarship" must include the suckerfishes that claim Mark etc is a forgery.
I choose the KJV over these suckerfish hambones.
...via the KJV.Ignorance is not bliss! Know the truth and the truth will set you free!
Oodles of PHD's of Christendom teach it.I bet you do! A closed mind is a very tragic thing!!!
BTW, where do people claim that "Mark etc is a forgery"?
...via the KJV.
Oodles of PHD's of Christendom teach it.
They even tell sinners that on PBS etc, per those "the Bible" episodes.
I saw them with my own eyes, debunk the Bible book by book.
Thou sayest!No. Using any of a number of excellent translations. The KJV is nothing more than a single translation, and in my opinion, not the best, as it is easily misunderstood and re-translated (intentionally or not) to mean what the reader wants it to mean.
I don't know of a single person, yourself included, who communicates in early 17th Century Englyshe. Why not? Because you want to be clearly understood.
Google it.If that is the case, produce the evidence. Otherwise I think you're lying.
Do you believe in an Old Earth? Yes, or no?
I agree. Well, said.
God bless you in the Lord today.
ThanksI may not be able to read the KJV, but don't care if others do.
So, IF I only read the KJV, you "don't care," but "I am from the pits of hell?"KJVO comes from the pits of hell
Thanks
So, IF I only read the KJV, you "don't care," but "I am from the pits of hell?"
So Glad to know God Is My Only JUDGE! Amen?
Bible Answer To Confusing church Bewilderment!
GRACE And Peace...
Thanks
So, IF I only read the KJV, you "don't care," but "I am from the pits of hell?"
So Glad to know God Is My Only JUDGE! Amen?
Bible Answer To Confusing church Bewilderment!
GRACE And Peace...
What I said is that the KJVO position is from the pits of hell. Not the person.
I tried to explain this also. Hopefully some of it will sink in!