You are still not getting it. You do not seem to even know that they are beloved for the father's sake because of the sacrifice they made that salvation could come to the Gentiles.
That was extremely pleasing to God. God divorced Israel and her sister despite those faithful father's. Why? That entire nation was sacrificed that it might present the opportunity to one man of it to fulfill that Law and become the sole possessor of all its promises that those promises could also be shared with men of faith out of every nation of men.
The proverbs says that the wicked are a sacrifice for the righteous. (Proverbs 21:18) But even the fleshly heritage of those past faithful Israelites was sacrificed for the purpose of allowing Jesus to occupy the exact position he had to be in to extend life to the entire world. Galatians 3:16
That is something a natural Israelite or Jew ought to be very proud of instead of fighting against it.
The problem is that you do not know what you don't know. And that is quite normal. I am handing you the keys that came hard for me. If you want to think about them and make it easier on yourself than it was for me to learn these things then now is your opportunity. Many don't. Oh well.
They are beloved because of the sacrifice they made and now all nations are to emulate their example.
Romans 12:1 "I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service."
None of this means we will cease to have the wonderful differences of the races which is like the variety of flowers. It means only that we become one in Christ and those fleshly pride filled heritages used as a boast by the carnal man are sacrificed for the sake of all. That is why Paul says there is neither Jew nor Greek in Christ and so forth. You know this stuff full well. You have just failed to put it all together. Galatians 3:27-28
They would have to take themselves out of Christ to have that old heritage.
Is that what you want them to do?
Echoing right back at you what you said to me, "Or do you still wrestle with Paul."
Once again your quotations lack OT flavour. Are you a NT only believer?
Paul’s knowledge of OT scriptures surpasses both of us...but we press on entering the Word and not wresting it as per your previous post.
I thought you would have picked up on the OT echoes?
For if the firstfruit be holy, the lump is also holy: and if the root be holy, so are the branches. And if some of the branches be broken off, and thou, being a wild olive tree, wert graffed in among them, and with them partakest of the root and fatness of the olive tree; (Romans 11:16,17)
Rom 11:16NET
Rom 11:17NET
Rom 11:16NIV
Rom 11:17NIV
See how the other translations have correctly understood the OT principles?
Lump is mixed or kneaded, such as dough that which came from the firstfruits of the harvest.
The Greek text implies “a mixture”. Notice the NIV?
This clearly shows that Paul's figure is derived from the ordinances of the Law contained in Num. 15:19,20,21.
Pauls forefathers constituted the "loaf of the first of the dough" offered up to Yahweh, but the "rest of the dough" should have provided further loaves.
Unfortunately, many of the subsequent "loaves" were imperfectly baked (see Hos 7:4, 6, 8), though, as Paul shows, the mass of dough (the nation as a whole) is still considered "holy".
Is this not the most beautiful piece of Scriptures in all Romans 11?
Vengle, an observation over the past four pages of posts appears to show your reluctance to go along with Paul in his OT arguments. You are not surprised they are here seeing we are speaking about Natural Israel, yes the lump!
Enjoying the message.

Insight