And what 'part' shall they have if they then in the end apart from the Body of Christ?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
And what 'part' shall they have if they then in the end apart from the Body of Christ?
I've heard it called the Harrowing of Hell.How were these faithful saints of Old indwelt with the Spirit of Christ (born again) after physical death so they too could ascend to heaven spiritually alive after the cross and resurrection of Christ and His ascension to heaven?
Should they DEPART they will have no PART. - LOLAnd what 'part' shall they have if they then in the end apart from the Body of Christ?
Not always.Pretty clear when you look at ALL the pertinent scriptures, the MANIFISTATION of the Spirit, which Spirit was within the baptized believers in biblical times per Acts 2:38, was the result of the laying on of the apostle's hands.
Don't look at Acts 10 and 2 to justify your statement. Acts 2 and 10 were very unique and not at all the norm, and the Spirit fell unilaterally and miraculously without the laying on of the apostle's hands fir a very good reason: to validate what was occurring in both instances in which the church was started, 1st I Jerusalem amongst the Jews, and then in Caesarea amongst the Gentiles. That's why the Spirit FELL on these as it did, as a sign that it was God's will.Not always.
The Holy Spirit doesn't like to be put in a box.
He is more unpredictable than that.
The house of Cornelius is the most obvious example.
They received the Spirit while Peter was still speaking to them.
Same with the outpouring at Pentecost.
And hopefully they didn't have to lay hands on each of the 3,000 added that day.
Even today, the laying on of hands is more tradition than the rule.
Many still receive the Spirit spontaneously. In some cases with no idea what it even is. - LOL
/
I see your point.Don't look at Acts 10 and 2 to justify your statement. Acts 2 and 10 were very unique and not at all the norm, and the Spirit fell unilaterally and miraculously without the laying on of the apostle's hands fir a very good reason: to validate what was occurring in both instances in which the church was started, 1st I Jerusalem amongst the Jews, and then in Caesarea amongst the Gentiles. That's why the Spirit FELL on these as it did, as a sign that it was God's will.
I'm not sure if I buy the two outpourings theory. One for the Jews and one for the gentiles.Don't look at Acts 10 and 2 to justify your statement. Acts 2 and 10 were very unique and not at all the norm, and the Spirit fell unilaterally and miraculously without the laying on of the apostle's hands fir a very good reason: to validate what was occurring in both instances in which the church was started, 1st I Jerusalem amongst the Jews, and then in Caesarea amongst the Gentiles. That's why the Spirit FELL on these as it did, as a sign that it was God's will.
I've heard it called the Harrowing of Hell.
Jesus took captivity captive... (it's in the Creed)
I believe it will happen again in the Age of Restoration.
/
I'm not sure if I buy the two outpourings theory. One for the Jews and one for the gentiles.
Do you see that supported anywhere else in the NT writings? (I will look myself now)
/
This is an old thread. I'm not concerned about getting off topic.I could say more, but I'm not sure you want your thread to go in the direction my comments might take it.
|
It came upon to strengthen them in speaking the word more boldly just a gentle boostI see your point.
What do you make of this?
Acts 4:31 NIV
After they prayed, the place where they were meeting was shaken.
And they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and spoke the word of God boldly
I see your point.
What do you make of this?
Acts 4:31 NIV
After they prayed, the place where they were meeting was shaken.
And they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and spoke the word of God boldly.
/
Would you agree that it was a third outpouring on a group of individuals?See post 132 which was a reply to your 126 post but for some reason didn't get posted there
No, I wouldn't agree cuz if you follow the text as I laid out, it appears that it was the apostles, and if so, they were the ones on which the power from on high was bestowedWould you agree that it was a third outpouring on a group of individuals?
There may have been others. And reports of some in our time. (Eskimos)
/
So, even though it was an additional outpouring, it doesn't count because they already had one?No, I wouldn't agree cuz if you follow the text as I laid out, it appears that it was the apostles, and if so, they were the ones on which the power from on high was bestowed
The Head [Jesus] is ready, but are all the parts ready and each in its proper place?
Eph 4:15 But speaking the truth in love, may grow up into him in all things, which is the head, even Christ: Eph 4:16 From whom the whole body fitly joined together and compacted by that which every joint supplieth, according to the effectual working in the measure of every part, maketh increase of the body unto the edifying of itself in love.
“Members” is an interesting word. It can mean a literal body part as in going into surgery to have one of your members amputated.
Not sure what your point is. The power from on high was promised to the 11 apostles per Luke 24:49 and was fulfilled starting with Acts 2 at which time the Spirit manifested itself by falling on them. If you're trying to find significance by how many times the Spirit did such along with Acts 10, then I suppose you could include that, but since it was upon those already promised such and that had already possessed the power from on high, it's not of any unique significance nor severed any unique purpose as did Acts 2 and 10 which were very significant. But also in those 2 instances, the Spirit simply fell on its own volition without any prior prayer, it just happened, being a surprise to all present. Note too, that there is evidence elsewhere that prayer by the apostles preceded the falling of the Spirit prior to the laying on of their hands, inferring that it wasn't automatic or that it (the miraculous manifestation of it, "gifts" if you will) happened every time. Note the wording of Acts 8:15, and the use of the word "might". It didn't say 'would', but rather "might".St. SteVen said:
Would you agree that it was a third outpouring on a group of individuals?
There may have been others. And reports of some in our time. (Eskimos)
So, even though it was an additional outpouring, it doesn't count because they already had one?
/