Where was Jesus between his death and resurrection?

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Ronald Nolette

Well-Known Member
Aug 24, 2020
15,091
4,477
113
70
South Carolina
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
The word "spirits" never signifies disembodied persons in Scriptures.

So what is that Scripture teaching?

F2F
Hebrews 12:23
To the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven, and to God the Judge of all, and to the spirits of just men made perfect,

1 Thessalonians 5:23
And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.

2 Corinthians 5:6
Therefore we are always confident, knowing that, whilst we are at home in the body, we are absent from the Lord:

2 Corinthians 5:8
We are confident, I say, and willing rather to be absent from the body, and to be present with the Lord.
 

Ronald Nolette

Well-Known Member
Aug 24, 2020
15,091
4,477
113
70
South Carolina
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
No sorry, it was the final parable, of a number of parable's however the last solely directed at the Pharisees, using their false teaching against them.

This is well documented and only those who hold to mythology make it literal.

F2F
Well as you just declared it is a parable is well documented- please show that documentation.

But why it is not a paraqble.

1. It is not found with any other parables.
2. No parable lists peoples name
3. All parables make a comparison between earthly and heavenly things, this makes no comparisons.
4. No other parable says "there was a..." without first identifying it is a parable
5. No comparative language is used as; Such as" " is likened unto" "is like" etc.
6. Jesus never called the believe in the place of torments, Abrahams bosom and Tartarus a false belief.
7. The three abodes of the dead was a common held belief (apart from the Sadducees)
 

Ronald Nolette

Well-Known Member
Aug 24, 2020
15,091
4,477
113
70
South Carolina
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
No they weren’t. Human “spirits in prison”? How can that be, when the Bible clearly says “the spirit returns to God who gave it”? -Ecclesiastes 12:7
Take it up with Peter!

1 Peter 3:

18 For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit:

19 By which also he went and preached unto the spirits in prison;

20 Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water.

21 The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ:

these are people not angels.
 

MatthewG

Well-Known Member
Apr 21, 2021
16,575
5,513
113
34
Fyffe
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
He went straight to hell.

He crossed from Paradise to Prison.

(Crossing the chasm that wasn't able to be crossed by others at that time it seems.)
 

wooddog

Member
May 8, 2024
111
25
28
64
cleveland
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Jesus being the Son of God was in no need of being born again, being the Word of God in the flesh
To say someone must be born again presumes they are a lost sinner.

Perhaps you are saying Jesus was born with an evil spirit? And not holy at his birth?
Are you saying Jesus was not born again?
 

wooddog

Member
May 8, 2024
111
25
28
64
cleveland
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
wooddog

Here is the answer...

Jesus entered once for all into the holy places, not by means of the blood of goats and calves but by means of his own blood, thus securing an eternal redemption. Hebrews 9:12

1. Did Jesus benefit from his own death?
2. Did Jesus require saving, and if so, from what?

Where in the Bible are we told Jesus required saving - not from sin but something else!

F2F
Did Christ raise himself or was he born again from his father?
 

Scott Downey

Well-Known Member
Dec 19, 2021
8,453
5,212
113
65
St. Thomas
Faith
Christian
Country
Virgin Islands, U.S.
Did Christ raise himself or was he born again from his father?
Christ was not born again
God raised up Christ.
What did Christ say to Father on the cross?
Luke 23
44 Now it [l]was about the sixth hour, and there was darkness over all the earth until the ninth hour. 45 Then the sun was [m]darkened, and the veil of the temple was torn in [n]two. 46 And when Jesus had cried out with a loud voice, He said, “Father, ‘into Your hands I commit My spirit.’ ” Having said this, He breathed His last.

So you have it right there, Christ the Son commits His future to God the Father in full trust.

The tearing of the temple veil is significant of the establishment of the New Covenant in Christ's blood. Christ opens a new way to the Father through himself dying on the cross as He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins against God.
It is the end of the Old Covenant relationship where the way to God was veiled and seen only by the Hebrew priests. Christ is now our great High Priest to God
 
Last edited:

Aunty Jane

Well-Known Member
Sep 16, 2021
7,063
3,884
113
Sydney
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
Wake is bodily alive
Sleep us bodily dead
Yet as it says, even the dead live together with HIM
That is perhaps the way you interpret what you read….but is your interpretation in line with what the rest of what the Scriptures say? Or is it colored by Christendom’s adopted belief in “immortality of the human soul”? Did Jesus teach this? Was it a Jewish belief originally?

In its teachings from early times, Christendom adopted many beliefs from pagan ideas, and grafted them into Scripture. Ambiguous verses that lent themselves to mistranslation and misinterpretation were presented as scriptural fact, when a little study would have revealed that these ideas were not ever part of Christ’s teachings. Jesus used the Hebrew Scriptures exclusively in his teachings. He told his Jewish audience that he was only teaching them, what his Father had taught him. (John 7:16) He revealed new facets in his teachings but not a completely new god with a completely new agenda.

The idea that the “soul” and the “spirit” are one and the same reveals the root of this problem. According to the Hebrew Scriptures, a “soul” is a living, breathing creature…..both humans and animals are called “souls” in the Bible….souls are entirely mortal….they all have “one spirit”, which Solomon describes as the “breath” that keeps them all living.
Eccl 3:18-20….
”I also said in my heart about the sons of men that the true God will test them and show them that they are like animals, 19 for there is an outcome for humans and an outcome for animals; they all have the same outcome. As the one dies, so the other dies; and they all have but one spirit. So man has no superiority over animals, for everything is futile. 20 All are going to the same place. They all come from the dust, and they all are returning to the dust.”

Was Solomon mistaken?
Adam was created as a “soul”, whom God brought to life by giving him “breath”. (spirit). Like animals, we become “souls” when we start breathing. When breathing ceases, we die…..there is no ‘immortal soul or spirit’ inherent in any earthly creature. We are by design, entirely mortal. Death is the end of life…but temporarily.

The word “soul” in Hebrew is “nᵊšāmâ”…..but what God put into Adam to make him a living “soul” was the “breath of life”.…”nep̄eš”. These two words had completely different meanings to Jesus‘ Jewish audience.

It was the pagan Greeks who believed in immortal souls. Their influence tainted both Jewish and Christian teachings. Both fell into apostasy and false religious beliefs, as the Scriptures clearly tell us.
So they who are dead do not simply cease to exist as if they never were until the resurrection
Since the resurrection is a “restoration of life”, NOT “a continuation” of it, the ones who have died are out of existence, but not out of the memory of the one who will recreate them and implant their personality and memories into a new body.
God tells us that he knows the names of all the stars he created…..do we not have faith that he will remember a few million humans who have drawn the breath he gave them?

The dead “sleep” because for us we know what “sleeping” means…..it is a temporary condition with the absence of consciousness, (Eccl 9,5, 10) but in the knowledge that an awakening is expected the next day.
We don’t fear sleep, so why do we fear death?

When people are placed in an induced coma, they have no memory of the passing of time…..sleep is the same. We don’t know when we fell asleep but when we awaken it is usually the next day and a whole night has passed without us being consciously aware of it. Why else would Jesus call death “sleep”?
9 For God did not appoint us to wrath, but to obtain salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ,
10 who died for us, that whether we wake or sleep, we should live together with Him.
Metaphor is read when we have a good grasp of Scripture through careful study. This is a classic example of reading more into a verse than what is actually stated.
11 Therefore [a]comfort each other and [b]edify one another, just as you also are doing.

Further proof sleep is used to describe physical death
Yes….”sleep is used to describe physical death”….but why? What do we humans know about “sleep” that makes our inevitable death, less dreadful?…..was it something to be feared? Was it something that would take us to the opposite destinations of “heaven or hell”? There is not one statement in the Bible to confirm that there ever was such an option. Again, careful study will reveal that God’s people were offered only two options….not “heaven or hell”….but ”life or death”. (Deut 30:19-20)

Physical death was the inevitable consequence of sin, but the only way to gain hope was to do the will of God, so that he would remember you in the resurrection. Those not remembered by God would stay in their grave permanently……everlasting death is the opposite of everlasting life……these were the only options for Jews…..Jesus did not change that, but his figurative language was used to promote something he never taught.
29 For he who eats and drinks [a]in an unworthy manner eats and drinks judgment to himself, not discerning the [b]Lord’s body.
30 For this reason many are weak and sick among you, and many [c]sleep.
31 For if we would judge ourselves, we would not be judged.
This is speaking of the partaking of the bread and wine as Christ instructed his disciples to do as a remembrance of him. It replaced the Jewish Passover as “the Lamb of God” had offered his sacrifice “once for all time”.
To partake of those precious emblems unworthily was to bring judgment upon themselves. To claim to be one of God’s elect (chosen ones) who were to rule with Christ in his Kingdom, (Rev 20:6) was to bring judgment upon the one partaking of it when they were not chosen to be part of that heavenly arrangement.

Not all Christians are heaven bound…..those aware of God’s original purpose would understand this. He did not create the earth as a training ground for heaven….it was to be our permanent home. (Isa 45:18)

Christendom has their members partaking of those emblems on a weekly basis when they are not of the elect…..judgment will be passed as Jesus said it would.

Those stuck in the divided and disunited church system, will never see the command in Rev 18:4-5 as pertaining to themselves. If they stay, they will be judged accordingly…..
If you cannot identify “Babylon the great”, how will you know why you have to “get out of” that spiritually immoral “city”?
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: TheHC and CTK

wooddog

Member
May 8, 2024
111
25
28
64
cleveland
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Christ was not born again
God raised up Christ.
What did Christ say to Father on the cross?
Luke 23
44 Now it [l]was about the sixth hour, and there was darkness over all the earth until the ninth hour. 45 Then the sun was [m]darkened, and the veil of the temple was torn in [n]two. 46 And when Jesus had cried out with a loud voice, He said, “Father, ‘into Your hands I commit My spirit.’ ” Having said this, He breathed His last.

So you have it right there, Christ the Son commits His future to God the Father in full trust.

The tearing of the temple veil is significant of the establishment of the New Covenant in Christ's blood. Christ opens a new way to the Father through himself dying on the cross as He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins against God.
It is the end of the Old Covenant relationship where the way to God was veiled and seen only by the Hebrew priests. Christ is now our great High Priest to God
Did his Father raise him up in anew body on the third day or not?
 

Scott Downey

Well-Known Member
Dec 19, 2021
8,453
5,212
113
65
St. Thomas
Faith
Christian
Country
Virgin Islands, U.S.
because he was dead.
Born again as described in bible is not the resurrection.

In Him was life, and the life was the light of men.

What did Jesus say?

John 11:25
Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in Me, though he may die, he shall live.
 

wooddog

Member
May 8, 2024
111
25
28
64
cleveland
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Born again as described in bible is not the resurrection.

In Him was life, and the life was the light of men.

What did Jesus say?

John 11:25
Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in Me, though he may die, he shall live.
Are you already born again?
 

face2face

Well-Known Member
Jun 22, 2015
8,243
1,203
113
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
Hebrews 12:23
To the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven, and to God the Judge of all, and to the spirits of just men made perfect,

1 Thessalonians 5:23
And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.

2 Corinthians 5:6
Therefore we are always confident, knowing that, whilst we are at home in the body, we are absent from the Lord:

2 Corinthians 5:8
We are confident, I say, and willing rather to be absent from the body, and to be present with the Lord.
Do you know what those Scriptures mean? Mind, Life & Body?

To be absent is not Paul wanting be unclothed but looking forward to being with Christ when he is resurrected at a future time.

Henceforth there is laid up for me the crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge, will award to me on that day, and not only to me but also to all who have loved his appearing. 2 Tim 4:8

Paul understood the state of the dead and he fully knew how the resurrection would take place.

No man has ascended Heaven!

F2F
 

face2face

Well-Known Member
Jun 22, 2015
8,243
1,203
113
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
Well as you just declared it is a parable is well documented- please show that documentation.

But why it is not a paraqble.

1. It is not found with any other parables.
2. No parable lists peoples name
3. All parables make a comparison between earthly and heavenly things, this makes no comparisons.
4. No other parable says "there was a..." without first identifying it is a parable
5. No comparative language is used as; Such as" " is likened unto" "is like" etc.
6. Jesus never called the believe in the place of torments, Abrahams bosom and Tartarus a false belief.
7. The three abodes of the dead was a common held belief (apart from the Sadducees)

This wisdom has been hidden from you.

1. This section mentions neither Heaven or souls
2. Assuming it is literal as you say lets consider the facts
- The passage speaks about bodies not souls. e.g. eyes, bosom (v23) tip of finger and tongue (v24)
- Souls are said to be immaterial (the material body being left in the grave), how then could Lazarus (if really a immaterial soul) be carried by angels? (see v22)
- The passage states that there was a great gulf fixed between Abraham and the rich man, yet they could both see and converse with each other in verse 26). Is the great gulf to be taken literally?
-Is heaven literally a place where conversations can be carried on between those enjoying bliss and those agonizing in hell?
- How could Lazarus go literally to Abraham's bosom? Abraham (as now) was unquestionably dead and without his reward. (Heb 11:8, 13, 39, 40).

39 And all these, though commended through their faith, did not receive what was promised, 40 since God had provided something better for us, that apart from us they should not be made perfect. Heb 11:39–40.

Do you understand what the adverb NOT ?

There are many more ridiculous queries that I can present if you so wish.

16:19 There was a rich man. By this introduction (literally a certain rich man), Luke indicated that what follows is a parable (see “Context” and comments on Luke 10:30)

Robert H. Stein,Luke, vol. 24 of The New American Commentary (Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers, 1992), 423.

The parable of the rich man and Lazarus is connected to the preceding as an example (Luke 16:19–26) both of a man who was a lover of money (16:14) and who foolishly made poor use of his possessions (16:9–13) as well as an example (16:27–31) of the continued validity of the law and the prophets (16:16–18). The audience envisioned by the parable fits well the Pharisee of 16:14, and 17:1 suggests this by changing the audience to the disciples. This parable is unusual for at least two reasons. For one it is the only parable in which a character is named. Because of the name “Lazarus” (16:20, 23–25), it has been suggested that 16:19–31 is not a parable but a historical account. Luke, however, clearly thought this was a parable, for he introduced it with “There was a [certain] rich man” (see comments on 10:30). Within the Gospel are seven instances in which an account begins “a certain man” (anthropos tis). In all but one (14:2) this was used to introduce a parable (10:30; 14:16; 15:11; 16:1 [“rich” is added]; 16:19 [“rich” is added]; 19:12 [“of noble birth” is added]). The last six examples are furthermore all introduced by “he [Jesus] said/was saying” whereas 14:2 is clearly part of a narrative. This account also begins with the same introduction as the parable in 16:1, “There was a rich man,” so that Luke intended for his readers to interpret this as a parable, not as a historical account. The parable is also unusual in that it is a two-part parable (cf. 15:11–32). Some have argued therefore that originally this was not one parable but two (16:19–26 and 16:27–31). As in 15:11–32 there is no compelling reason why this could not have consisted from the beginning as a two-part parable. Non-Lukan vocabulary throughout the parable indicates that the present two-part form is pre-Lukan, and there is no reason Jesus could not have spoken the parable essentially in its present form unless we claim that the parable explicitly refers to Jesus’ resurrection (16:30–31) and that he could not have made such a reference. The meaning of the parable is relatively clear. The first part (16:19–26) illustrates the blessedness of the poor believer (6:20) and the woe of the unbelieving rich (6:24). This reversal of roles between this life and the next was well-known in Egyptian and Jewish folklore, and Jesus may have borrowed some of the material for his parable from such folklore. Such a reversal fits well Jesus’ teaching and Luke’s emphasis concerning riches (cf. 12:13–21). See Introduction 8 (5). The second part of the parable (16:27–31) teaches that unbelief and the refusal to repent are not the results of lack of evidence (or lack of a sign) but due to a stony heart.

Robert H. Stein,Luke vol. 24 of The New American Commentary (Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers, 1992), 421–422.

If you want more references and more insightful studies on this section please read this thread here The Parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus

Enjoy
F2F
 
  • Like
Reactions: CTK

face2face

Well-Known Member
Jun 22, 2015
8,243
1,203
113
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
@Ronald Nolette

". . . Unto you it is given to know the mystery of the kingdom of God; but unto them that are without, all these things are done in parables: That seeing they may see, and not perceive; and hearing they may hear, and not understand. . . " (Mark 4:11,12).

"But without a parable spake he not unto them: and when they were alone, he expounded all things to his disciples." (Mark 4:34).

Rather than forcing non Biblical notions upon this parable you would be wise to learn its mystery.

Back on topic.

Death is the cessation of life and its within Yahwehs Power to raise the dead from their sleep. Some to everlasting life and some to everlasting death

Death is given more figrative language because God is not pleased when the wicked perish, but wants all to come to the knowledge of everlasting life in Christ Jesus. The severity of death in the Mind of God is communicated as being a torment, shame, disgrace and is the opposite of the God of the Living!

F2F
 
Last edited:

face2face

Well-Known Member
Jun 22, 2015
8,243
1,203
113
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
Did Christ raise himself or was he born again from his father?
Upon being resurrected by God he became the first man to be raised to eternal life and "became" a life giving Spirit.

What this means is God placed in Christ, the knowledge of "Life" and "Life" itself!

2 May grace and peace be multiplied to you in the knowledge of God and of Jesus our Lord. 2 Pe 1:2.

3 His (God) divine power has granted to us all things that pertain to life and godliness, through the knowledge of him who called us to his own glory and excellence, 2 Pe 1:3.

Peter places the emphasis on knowledge, for without a correct knowledge how can one attain Life? i.e Christ was given the "words" of eternal life.

If you also read the Acts of the Apostles every reference to the resurrection is said to be done by God - the dead know nothing.

F2F
 
Last edited:

face2face

Well-Known Member
Jun 22, 2015
8,243
1,203
113
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
@everyone

The importance of Jesus' death and the complete cessation of his life demonstrates the Power of God to raise that life and clothe His Son with immortality. Once the nature is clothed with immortality he become an eternal being who is unble to die. Divine nature cannot sin or die.

4 by which he has granted to us his precious and very great promises, so that through them you may become partakers of the divine nature, having escaped from the corruption that is in the world because of sinful desire 2 Pe 1:4.

Jesus has the same body today, as he did during his ministry bearing the same nail marks from his cricifixtion, however God clothed him, "put on" immortality thereby making him Divine Nature.

Jesus went from corrupting nature (if left in the grave) to incorruptable nature (Divine).

The wonder in this is he is the only person from this creation to be glorified.

F2F
 
  • Like
Reactions: wooddog

face2face

Well-Known Member
Jun 22, 2015
8,243
1,203
113
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
As a result of God's Victory in the flesh, God removed the law of sin and death in His Son's body, declaring His Righteous treatment of Sin's Flesh and its Lust's and Passions, by nailing it to a tree.

The "Life" is not some immortal essense or immaterial spirit in us but the knowledge of Christ and his Life.

God placed this life in his son.

11 And this is the testimony,(knowledge) that God gave us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. 12 Whoever has the Son has life; whoever does not have the Son of God does not have life.1 Jn 5:11–12.

Yet it is still a ‘hope’

1 Paul, a servant of God and an apostle of Jesus Christ, for the sake of the faith of God’s elect and their knowledge of the truth, which accords with godliness, 2 in hope of eternal life, (Divine nature) which God, who never lies, promised before the ages began 3 and at the proper time manifested in his word through the preaching with which I have been entrusted by the command of God our Savior; Tt 1:1–3.

Which we have by promise.

And this is the promise that he made to us—eternal life. 1 Jn 2:25.

The promise of Divine Nature is for those who fulfill Romans 2:7

6 He will render to each one according to his works (of faith): 7 to those who by patience in well-doing seek for glory and honor and immortality, he will give eternal life; Ro 2:6–7.

Both Paul and Peter agree this eternal life is the change from mortal corrupt nature to divine Holy nature.

Now I do not know what comprises this divine nature - it cannot be flesh and blood! However, Christ, the angles all present as physical beings with a nature that can be touched.

In the end we are told...

God’s children now, and what we will be has not yet appeared; but we know that when he appears we shall be like him, because we shall see him as he is.1 Jn 3:2.

O how rich the Promise!

Amen
 

face2face

Well-Known Member
Jun 22, 2015
8,243
1,203
113
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
Those stuck in the divided and disunited church system, will never see the command in Rev 18:4-5 as pertaining to themselves. If they stay, they will be judged accordingly…..
If you cannot identify “Babylon the great”, how will you know why you have to “get out of” that spiritually immoral “city”?
A great deal in this post was spoken in truth except for a couple of points.

The Scripture is clear it will be our own bodies which will be changed. God will recreate us and clothe us with immortality and we will become eternal beings.

Regarding your Revelation 18:4-5 A similar appeal was addressed to the people of God in historic Babylon before its destruction. (Both Jews and the Strangers with them)

Leave Babylon! Flee from the Babylonians! Announce it with a shout of joy! Make this known! Proclaim it throughout the earth! Say, ‘The Lord protects his servant Jacob'. Is 48:20.

Get out of Babylonia quickly, you foreign people. Flee to save your lives. Do not let yourselves be killed because of her sins. For it is time for the Lord to wreak his revenge. He will pay Babylonia back for what she has done Je 51:6.

Revelation 18:4=5 is a "last call" but to who and out of what?

You are right to suggest the JW's have come out from her - I agree with this, but don't assume only the JW's will be saved! I understand why it is you must beleive this, though there is still much for you to learn concerning the events subsequent to the Lord's return.

F2F