You're twisting Scripture to force your theology and ignoring the full counsel of God. I'm not confusing covenant fulfillment with nationalism, and I'm not preaching two peoples or two plans. I'm pointing out what the Bible actually says. God made everlasting promises to Israel, not just spiritual ones, but literal ones, including the land, and you don’t get to cancel that just because it doesn’t fit your view of fulfillment.
Yes, Galatians 3:16 says the seed is Christ, but that doesn’t erase the covenant God made with Abraham’s descendants. Being in Christ means sharing in the spiritual blessings of that promise, but it doesn’t wipe out the specific promises God made to the nation of Israel. Romans 11 says Israel has been partially blinded, not replaced. And it says they will be grafted in again. That’s not symbolic language, it’s a real future event. The olive tree isn’t the Church replacing Israel, it’s God's covenant purpose, and both Jews and Gentiles are grafted into it.
Your claim that believing in God’s faithfulness to Israel guts the gospel is nonsense. God does not break His promises. If He did, no one could trust the promise of eternal life either. You accuse others of heresy while ignoring what the Bible plainly says. Your version of “one body” erases entire chapters of Scripture to force everything into one box. That’s not biblical theology, that’s replacement error dressed in poetic language.
The Messiah reigns, yes, but He will also return and fulfill every word God spoke, including His promises to Israel. Denying that isn’t faith, it’s arrogance. So no, I haven’t confused anything. You’ve just rejected the parts of Scripture that contradict your system.
You say I’m twisting scripture — but you’re the one preaching a gospel with a second track.
You keep talking about
"the plain reading" of the Bible — while ignoring the plainest truth in all of scripture:
“All the promises of God find their Yes in Christ.” — 2 Corinthians 1:20
If the promise to Abraham — including the land — isn’t fulfilled
in Christ, then what exactly
was the cross for?
To put the Church on pause so He could go back to working with unbelievers who rejected Him?
That’s not the Gospel — that’s a
blasphemous detour that demotes Jesus to
Plan B in His own covenant.
You keep saying the promises were “literal.”
I agree —
and they were literally fulfilled in Jesus.
He
is the Seed.
He
is the Land.
He
is the Temple.
He
is the Kingdom.
“Destroy this temple and in three days I will raise it up… but He was speaking of the temple of His body.” — John 2:19,21
“Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth.” — Matthew 5:5
“There is neither Jew nor Greek... for you are all one in Christ Jesus. And if you are Christ’s, then you are Abraham’s seed.” — Galatians 3:28–29
Your theology needs two peoples.
Mine comes from
Jesus, who said:
“There shall be one flock, one Shepherd.” — John 10:16
You say “being in Christ means sharing in the spiritual blessings” —
but the Bible never divides the promises into spiritual vs literal.
That’s
your false dichotomy.
God doesn’t split covenants.
He
fulfills them all in Christ.
Romans 11 doesn’t say ethnic Israel gets a second covenant or a reset button.
It says they were
broken off in unbelief — and can be grafted back in
if they do not continue in unbelief.
Not because of land.
Not because of race.
But because of
repentance and faith in Jesus.
You say this isn't symbolic?
Fine.
Then show me the chapter where Jesus hands out deed papers to Tel Aviv.
Where’s the verse where Christ’s return revolves around political borders, tanks and bulldozers?
You can’t find one — because this “literal land covenant” obsession isn’t from the Bible.
It’s from Scofield.
It’s from Oxford.
It’s from Zionist propaganda smuggled into the Church under the label of theology.
You keep saying “God doesn’t break His promises.”
Exactly.
That’s why
He fulfilled them in His Son.
Not in a secular state.
Not in a bloodline.
Not in a flag.
You think I’m erasing scripture.
No — I’m magnifying
what it all points to:
Jesus Christ is the inheritance.
He
is the Yes.
He
is the Land.
He
is the Promise.
“In Him we have obtained an inheritance…” — Ephesians 1:11
“…an inheritance incorruptible and undefiled and that does not fade away, reserved in heaven for you.” — 1 Peter 1:4
The Church doesn’t erase Israel.
It is Israel — reborn, redeemed, resurrected in Christ.
That’s not arrogance.
That’s faith.
What you’re defending is not biblical.
It’s not theological.
It’s
nationalist idolatry in covenant drag.
The true gospel doesn’t revolve around a border war.
It revolves around
a slain Lamb and an eternal Kingdom
— and if that Kingdom isn’t enough for you, then
you’ve already missed it.
To believe this Dispensationalist heresy and nonsense, you literally have to start thinking like a
Christ-rejecting Jew —
because that’s where this theology
comes from.
You have to mentally demote Jesus.
You have to make
ethnicity more important than faith,
land more sacred than the cross,
and
a political nation more central than the Body of Christ.
You have to believe that
the people who rejected the Messiah still get the promises
without Him,
while those who worship Him are somehow second-tier, just “grafted in.”
You have to think God made an eternal covenant with bloodlines instead of bloodshed —
and that the
crucifixion of His Son wasn’t enough to fulfill the promises,
so He has to circle back later and pass out real estate to unbelievers.
That’s not Christianity.
That’s
Talmudic Zionism disguised as prophecy.
It turns the Gospel into a
supporting act
for the very people who
killed the main character.
If that’s your theology, don’t call it biblical.
Don’t call it Christian.
Call it what it is:
Scofield-Approved Messianic Rejection —
a heresy that puts Christ on the back burner
and gives His inheritance to those who still deny He ever came.
