You've already admitted you reject the Bible! So all you have to offer are YOUR opinions.hmmm, as I thought. You ask things you don't want to know and don't ask about that which you aught to know.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
You've already admitted you reject the Bible! So all you have to offer are YOUR opinions.hmmm, as I thought. You ask things you don't want to know and don't ask about that which you aught to know.
You just don't get why I've asked this particularly in its context or you don't want to know.Have you noticed how many words the Bible contains….not for people who have the concentration span of a goldfish. There is much to be said….if you have a problem with the length of my responses….the solution is really simple….no one is standing over you with a big stick….![]()
Jesus did not teach that. In Matthew 25:46 he plainly states: “And these shall go away into everlasting punishment, but the righteous into life eternal.” The same word aiōnios is used for both “punishment” and “life.” If the punishment is something one experiences with Christ, then by the same word it is everlasting. You cannot switch the word to something temporary just because you want to fit it with a time of destruction. The text does not allow that. Revelation 14: 11 speaks of the punishment of the lost, saying “the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever, and they have no rest day nor night.” That is not destruction with an end. That is an unceasing, ongoing reality.I agree. The punishment, which is death, is forever. Therefore no resurrection from the second death. Note well. The scripture does not say never ending punishing, as in continuing action. It is punishment. And death, after a time (few or many stripes) of real suffering, comes in the form of eventual destruction.
But more importantly, those of you who genuinely believe that God is one that would find satisfaction in inflicting pain and agony and suffering upon anyone, for any reason, without mercy and without end, do not know God well enough. Your perspective as to Who He is and what He is like is frankly a perspective that Satan would be delighted that you cleave to.
Why do we need rescue? From the beginning.I agree, but it’s not that God created evil for the sake of it……he created balance in all of his creation…equal opposites exist in all areas of our life, many of which we just take for granted….the only equal opposites he wanted to keep in his own jurisdiction were “the knowledge of good and evil”……and for a very good reason.
Should the opposite of God’s goodness ever be unleashed on humanity…..it would be a disaster! And that is exactly what happened…..this knowledge was chosen by our first parents, not forced on them...it is forced on us though as we navigate our way in a world that was handed over to God’s enemy. (Luke 4:5-7)
Amid all the chaos, God would shine a light to show us the way out.….
We are the innocent victims here, and a rescue mission is already under way, but in God’s time, not ours.
You're debating the JW Governing Body. That's all JW's know about the Bible.Why do we need rescue? From the beginning.
Think beyond the impulse to blame Adam and Eve.
Here we go with the mind games again....mate, if you cannot speak clearly and make yourself understood, that is hadrdly the fault of the one you are responding to....You just don't get why I've asked this particularly in its context or you don't want to know.
Considering your observation…it is contradictory, yea? Especially how we (mankind) define vengeance. Another contradiction I thought of a while ago was where God repented that He made man on the earth because man is evil. Genesis 6:5-7 And GOD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. [6] And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart. [7] And the LORD said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repented me that I have made them.We have often heard about these two aspects of God's character, His love and His wrath.
The concept is acceptable to many, citing biblical sources to confirm.
But to others it is troubling, noting that the character of God does not allow for such a contradiction.
Since God is love, His wrath also needs to be a manifestation of love.
But that's not the description given by many. They describe an anger driven rage, which is obviously not love.
How do we resolve this contradiction?
The Wrath of God - How is it love?
Isn't it strange how you can't understand me in the present day but give plenty of commentary on what was written thousands of years ago ....which you think you understand.Here we go with the mind games again....mate, if you cannot speak clearly and make yourself understood, that is hadrdly the fault of the one you are responding to....
Most people on here will have no idea what you mean unless you make it clear.....we are not mind readers....what is obvious to you is not necessarily obvious to those you speak to....do you want to know?
Vengeance is vengeance. It doesn't mean one thing for humankind and something else for God.Considering your observation…it is contradictory, yea? Especially how we (mankind) define vengeance.
I give up.....Isn't it strange how you can't understand me in the present day but give plenty of commentary on what was written thousands of years ago ....which you think you understand.

An eye for an eye..then?Vengeance is vengeance. It doesn't mean one thing for humankind and something else for God.
[
No.An eye for an eye..then?
Then why do we need to learn new thoughts and new ways? “Be not conformed to the word, but be you transformed by the renewing of the mind.” look up revenge, or wrath, or vengeance …not in the Bible. But the definition widely known as what wrath, revenge, vengeance is. Is it the same as God’s definition? “My ways are higher than your ways, and My thoughts are Higher than your own thoughts”Vengeance is vengeance. It doesn't mean one thing for humankind and something else for God.
[
St. SteVen said:
Vengeance is vengeance. It doesn't mean one thing for humankind and something else for God.
No.
If revenge is a sin for us, it's not okay for God either.
Unless He operates at a lower standard than He holds us to.
Is Revenge a Sin?
Most readers would answer in the affirmative. Yes, revenge is a sin... for us, but not for God. For us, but not for God? Why? Does God operate at a lower standard than he holds us to? Many would bristle at that question. Why? We are required to love our enemies. Jesus taught this as godly...www.christianityboard.com
[
Of course death is everlasting, unless there's a resurrection. Death is also a punishment. It's final. It isn't ongoing. It is not punishing. It is punishment.Jesus did not teach that. In Matthew 25:46 he plainly states: “And these shall go away into everlasting punishment, but the righteous into life eternal.” The same word aiōnios is used for both “punishment” and “life.” If the punishment is something one experiences with Christ, then by the same word it is everlasting. You cannot switch the word to something temporary just because you want to fit it with a time of destruction. The text does not allow that. Revelation 14: 11 speaks of the punishment of the lost, saying “the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever, and they have no rest day nor night.” That is not destruction with an end. That is an unceasing, ongoing reality.
Scripture never once describes the second death as temporary torment followed by nothingness. Revelation 20: 10 says the devil, the beast, and the false prophet will be “tormented day and night for ever and ever.” A few verses later, in Revelation 20:15, everyone whose name is not written in the Book of Life is cast into the same lake of fire. To say they are merely extinguished is to ignore the plain context. God is not mocked, and His Word is not fuzzy. The punishment is just as real and enduring as the reward.
Finally, you have the emotional objection that an eternal punishment would make God unmerciful, but that is not in the Bible. God has been merciful. He sent His Son to take our place and take the wrath that we deserved (Romans 5:8). If a person refuses that mercy, he or she is free to reap the justice that they deserve. Hebrews 10: 29–31 reminds us that anyone who treats the blood of Christ as a joke will be under “sorer punishment” and the chapter ends with, “It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.” To cry out that God is cruel when He simply executes perfect justice is to slander His nature. This is not a God who is giddy with the pain of His creatures. The problem is that sinners despise the only escape He provides. God is just and He cannot say one thing and be the opposite. If anyone chooses to continue in rebellion, he will know God’s righteous anger to the full.
Note:
Because the flesh hates the unpalatable truths of Scripture. Many who profess Christ still trip over the offense of God’s justice. Paul foretold that very thing in 2 Timothy 4: 3–4, “For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears, and they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.”
People attempt to make it more comfortable. They manufacture a “God” who only destroys but does not judge eternally, or who loves without wrath, or whatever. Because that version of God feels better to believe in. The problem is not in God’s Word, it is unbelief. They do not tremble at God’s Word, but mold it to make it more comfortable to their emotions. Jesus made it clear in John 12: 48, “He that rejecteth me, and receiveth not my words, hath one that judgeth him: the word that I have spoken, the same shall judge him in the last day.”
So when a professing Christian starts altering what the Bible actually says, it exposes their unbelief and shows that they are “trusting in their own understanding” (Proverbs 3: 5) instead of humbling themselves to God’s Word. They want a gospel that is less offensive, less fearful, more comfortable to human wisdom. But the truth is not ours to edit. God’s Word stands as it is, whether men receive it or not.
If someone denies what Scripture clearly teaches about eternal punishment, that raises serious questions about whether they truly know Christ. Being born again means submitting to God’s Word, not rewriting it to fit our preferences.
No need to give up, just be reasonable and acknowledge the truth of the matter when its in your face.I give up.....![]()
If the Bible isn't using common definitions, then I would say that the translators got it wrong.Then why do we need to learn new thoughts and new ways? “Be not conformed to the word, but be you transformed by the renewing of the mind.” look up revenge, or wrath, or vengeance …not in the Bible. But the definition widely known as what wrath, revenge, vengeance is. Is it the same as God’s definition? “My ways are higher than your ways, and My thoughts are Higher than your own thoughts”
Translating from ancient texts is tricky because the vocabulary in Hebrew has considerably less words to utilise than English. Also a translator translates through their bias.....as do we.If the Bible isn't using common definitions, then I would say that the translators got it wrong.
How is the common person supposed to understand the Bible if the definitions are a shell game?
New Christians don't automatically have skills in lexical definitions.
[
Yes.Translating from ancient texts is tricky because the vocabulary in Hebrew has considerably less words to utilise than English. Also a translator translates through their bias.....as do we.
Understanding the scriptures is as much the leading of God's Spirit as it is reading the words.Yes.
And clarity is further computerized by the definitions shell game.
Why do we need a secret decoder ring to understand the Bible.
This is Freakin' nuts. (no wonder I don't trust the Bible)
[