The Wages of Sin is Death, Jesus died a Death none other could.

[MatthewG]

If the wages of sin is death and Jesus died a death no one else could, doesn't that mean sin is taken care of?

Yes — if the wages of sin is death, and Jesus died the death no one else could, then the debt of sin is fully paid, once for all, for everyone. Scripture is extremely clear on this. The only way sin could still be an issue is if Jesus’ death wasn’t enough — and the New Testament refuses that idea outright.

1. The wages of sin is death — not guilt, not shame, not ongoing punishment​

Romans 6:23 doesn’t say:

• “The wages of sin is feeling bad.”
• “The wages of sin is struggling forever.”
• “The wages of sin is God being mad at you.”

It says:

“The wages of sin is death.”

So if death is the payment… and Jesus died… then the payment is done.

2. Jesus didn’t die a death — He died the death​

Hebrews 2:9 says:

“He tasted death for every man.”

Not a death. Not His own death. Not a symbolic death.

He tasted the death — the one that was owed.

And Hebrews 10:12 says:

“He offered one sacrifice for sins forever.”

If the wages of sin is death, and He paid that wage forever, then sin is not an unpaid bill.

3. If Jesus paid the full wage, then sin cannot still be charging people​

Otherwise:

• Jesus paid the wage
• But the wage is still due
• Which means the payment didn’t work

That would make the cross a partial payment, which the Bible rejects.

Hebrews 10:18:

“Where remission of these is, there is no more offering for sin.”

If there is no more offering, then the debt is gone.

4. Jesus’ death was unique — meaning it covered what no human death could​

You said it perfectly:

“Jesus died a death no one else could.”

Exactly.

Why?

Because:

• He had no sin of His own
• He could die as a substitute
• His life was of infinite worth
• His sacrifice was once for all (Heb. 10:10)

If His death was unique, then His payment was unique — and complete.

5. If sin still had power, Jesus would have to die again​

Hebrews 9:26 destroys that idea:

“He would have had to suffer often… but now once… He put away sin by the sacrifice of Himself.”

If sin wasn’t taken care of, Jesus would need to keep dying. But He doesn’t. Because it’s done.

6. The Bible’s own logic is airtight​

Let’s put it in a simple chain:

1. Sin demands death (Rom. 6:23)
2. Jesus died that death (Heb. 2:9)
3. He died once for all (Heb. 10:10)
4. He put away sin (Heb. 9:26)
5. There is no more offering for sin (Heb. 10:18)

Conclusion: Sin is taken care of. Completely.

7. So why do people still talk about sin?​

Because religion needs sin to stay in business.

Jesus ended the sin‑debt. Religion resurrects it every Sunday.

But the New Testament says:

• You are dead to sin (Rom. 6:11)
• Sin shall not have dominion over you (Rom. 6:14)
• You have been perfected forever (Heb. 10:14)
• You are a new creation (2 Cor. 5:17)

If the wages are paid, the case is closed.

Your statement is correct​

If the wages of sin is death… and Jesus died the death no one else could… then sin is taken care of.

Not “partially.” Not “conditionally.” Not “until you mess up again.”

Once for all.

 

[MatthewG]

People hold on to sin-language because it gives them something to accuse, control, or condemn others with.

It’s easier to point fingers than to stand honestly before the One they claim to serve.

“Why do you look at the speck in your brother’s eye but ignore the plank in your own?” (Matthew 7:3)

Good or bad, Yahavah is not a man. He isn’t fragile, and He isn’t shocked by anything we bring to Him.

“God is not a man, that He should lie.” (Numbers 23:19)

He already knows the truth about us, and we are still responsible for our own actions.

“Each of us will give an account of himself to God.” (Romans 14:12)

Scripture even says God can shake a person’s faith, discipline them, and bring them low if needed.

“For the Lord disciplines the one He loves… and scourges every son whom He receives.” (Hebrews 12:6)

Most people don’t like that, so they cling to man‑made ideas about what gets someone “closer” to Yahavah. And if you don’t follow their system, suddenly “God hates you” or “you’re not worth their time.”

That’s not God — that’s people.

Abuse, manipulation, and spiritual pressure happen everywhere. Sometimes people are so surrounded by certain teachings that they don’t even realize they’ve been shaped — or brainwashed — by them.

“Bad company corrupts good morals.” (1 Corinthians 15:33)

But Jesus didn’t come to put people under more chains.

He came to set people free from the burdens others place on them.
“If the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed.” (John 8:36)

 

[MatthewG]

I’m thankful for this.

 

[MatthewG]

I'm so thankful for this!

Everytime I get to when Yeshua dies I typically start crying because it's really sad.

This is sad. However, Yahavah still rose his Son up on the Third day! This is a reason to rejoice because resurrection exists!

 

[Soyeong]

If the wages of sin is death and Jesus died a death no one else could, doesn't that mean sin is taken care of?

Yes — if the wages of sin is death, and Jesus died the death no one else could, then the debt of sin is fully paid, once for all, for everyone. Scripture is extremely clear on this. The only way sin could still be an issue is if Jesus’ death wasn’t enough — and the New Testament refuses that idea outright.

1. The wages of sin is death — not guilt, not shame, not ongoing punishment​

Romans 6:23 doesn’t say:

• “The wages of sin is feeling bad.”
• “The wages of sin is struggling forever.”
• “The wages of sin is God being mad at you.”

It says:


So if death is the payment… and Jesus died… then the payment is done.

2. Jesus didn’t die a death — He died the death​

Hebrews 2:9 says:


Not a death. Not His own death. Not a symbolic death.

He tasted the death — the one that was owed.

And Hebrews 10:12 says:


If the wages of sin is death, and He paid that wage forever, then sin is not an unpaid bill.

3. If Jesus paid the full wage, then sin cannot still be charging people​

Otherwise:

• Jesus paid the wage
• But the wage is still due
• Which means the payment didn’t work

That would make the cross a partial payment, which the Bible rejects.

Hebrews 10:18:


If there is no more offering, then the debt is gone.

4. Jesus’ death was unique — meaning it covered what no human death could​

You said it perfectly:


Exactly.

Why?

Because:

• He had no sin of His own
• He could die as a substitute
• His life was of infinite worth
• His sacrifice was once for all (Heb. 10:10)

If His death was unique, then His payment was unique — and complete.

5. If sin still had power, Jesus would have to die again​

Hebrews 9:26 destroys that idea:


If sin wasn’t taken care of, Jesus would need to keep dying. But He doesn’t. Because it’s done.

6. The Bible’s own logic is airtight​

Let’s put it in a simple chain:

1. Sin demands death (Rom. 6:23)
2. Jesus died that death (Heb. 2:9)
3. He died once for all (Heb. 10:10)
4. He put away sin (Heb. 9:26)
5. There is no more offering for sin (Heb. 10:18)

Conclusion: Sin is taken care of. Completely.

7. So why do people still talk about sin?​

Because religion needs sin to stay in business.

Jesus ended the sin‑debt. Religion resurrects it every Sunday.

But the New Testament says:

• You are dead to sin (Rom. 6:11)
• Sin shall not have dominion over you (Rom. 6:14)
• You have been perfected forever (Heb. 10:14)
• You are a new creation (2 Cor. 5:17)

If the wages are paid, the case is closed.

Your statement is correct​

If the wages of sin is death… and Jesus died the death no one else could… then sin is taken care of.

Not “partially.” Not “conditionally.” Not “until you mess up again.”

Once for all.

Our salvation from sin would be incomplete if we were only saved from the penalty of our sin while we continued to be doers of sin, so there is an aspect of our gift of salvation from sin that we are experiencing in the present by repenting and becoming a doer of the Law of God. Jesus saves us fro our sin (Matthew 1:21) and sin is the transgression of the Law of God), so Jesus graciously teaching us to experience being a doer of it is intrinsically the way that he is giving us his gift of saving us from not being a doer of it.

The content of a gift can be the experience of doing something, such as giving someone the opportunity to experience driving a Ferrari, where the gift intrinsically requires then to do the work of driving it in order to experience driving it, but where doing that work contributes nothing towards earning the opportunity to drive it as the result. In Titus 2:11-13, the content of our gift of salvation is described as being trained by grace to do what is godly, righteous, ad good, and to renounce doing what is ungodly, so we are not extrinsically required to be doer of those works in order to earn our salvation as the result and we are not extrinsically required to do those works as the result of having first been saved, but rather we are intrinsically required to be a doer of those works because God graciously teaching us to experience being a doer of them is part of the content of His gift of salvation. In Titus 2:14, it does not say that Jesus gave himself just to redeem us from all lawlessness but also to purify for himself a people of his own possession who are zealous for doing good works, so the way to believe in what he accomplished through the cross is by becoming zealous for doing good works in obedience to the Law of God (Acts 21:20).

In Titus 2

 

[Soyeong]

If the wages of sin is death and Jesus died a death no one else could, doesn't that mean sin is taken care of?

Yes — if the wages of sin is death, and Jesus died the death no one else could, then the debt of sin is fully paid, once for all, for everyone. Scripture is extremely clear on this. The only way sin could still be an issue is if Jesus’ death wasn’t enough — and the New Testament refuses that idea outright.

1. The wages of sin is death — not guilt, not shame, not ongoing punishment​

Romans 6:23 doesn’t say:

• “The wages of sin is feeling bad.”
• “The wages of sin is struggling forever.”
• “The wages of sin is God being mad at you.”

It says:


So if death is the payment… and Jesus died… then the payment is done.

2. Jesus didn’t die a death — He died the death​

Hebrews 2:9 says:


Not a death. Not His own death. Not a symbolic death.

He tasted the death — the one that was owed.

And Hebrews 10:12 says:


If the wages of sin is death, and He paid that wage forever, then sin is not an unpaid bill.

3. If Jesus paid the full wage, then sin cannot still be charging people​

Otherwise:

• Jesus paid the wage
• But the wage is still due
• Which means the payment didn’t work

That would make the cross a partial payment, which the Bible rejects.

Hebrews 10:18:


If there is no more offering, then the debt is gone.

4. Jesus’ death was unique — meaning it covered what no human death could​

You said it perfectly:


Exactly.

Why?

Because:

• He had no sin of His own
• He could die as a substitute
• His life was of infinite worth
• His sacrifice was once for all (Heb. 10:10)

If His death was unique, then His payment was unique — and complete.

5. If sin still had power, Jesus would have to die again​

Hebrews 9:26 destroys that idea:


If sin wasn’t taken care of, Jesus would need to keep dying. But He doesn’t. Because it’s done.

6. The Bible’s own logic is airtight​

Let’s put it in a simple chain:

1. Sin demands death (Rom. 6:23)
2. Jesus died that death (Heb. 2:9)
3. He died once for all (Heb. 10:10)
4. He put away sin (Heb. 9:26)
5. There is no more offering for sin (Heb. 10:18)

Conclusion: Sin is taken care of. Completely.

7. So why do people still talk about sin?​

Because religion needs sin to stay in business.

Jesus ended the sin‑debt. Religion resurrects it every Sunday.

But the New Testament says:

• You are dead to sin (Rom. 6:11)
• Sin shall not have dominion over you (Rom. 6:14)
• You have been perfected forever (Heb. 10:14)
• You are a new creation (2 Cor. 5:17)

If the wages are paid, the case is closed.

Your statement is correct​

If the wages of sin is death… and Jesus died the death no one else could… then sin is taken care of.

Not “partially.” Not “conditionally.” Not “until you mess up again.”

Once for all.

Our salvation from sin would be incomplete if we were only saved from the penalty of our sin while we continued to be doers of sin, so there is an aspect of our gift of salvation from sin that we are experiencing in the present by repenting and becoming a doer of the Law of God. Jesus saves us fro our sin (Matthew 1:21) and sin is the transgression of the Law of God, so Jesus graciously teaching us to experience being a doer of it is intrinsically the way that he is giving us his gift of saving us from not being a doer of it.

The content of a gift can be the experience of doing something, such as giving someone the opportunity to experience driving a Ferrari, where the gift intrinsically requires then to do the work of driving it in order to experience driving it, but where doing that work contributes nothing towards earning the opportunity to drive it as the result. In Titus 2:11-13, the content of our gift of salvation is described as being trained by grace to do what is godly, righteous, ad good, and to renounce doing what is ungodly, so we are not extrinsically required to be doer of those works in order to earn our salvation as the result and we are not extrinsically required to do those works as the result of having first been saved, but rather we are intrinsically required to be a doer of those works because God graciously teaching us to experience being a doer of them is part of the content of His gift of salvation. In Titus 2:14, it does not say that Jesus gave himself just to redeem us from all lawlessness but also to purify for himself a people of his own possession who are zealous for doing good works, so the way to believe in what he accomplished through the cross is by becoming zealous for doing good works in obedience to the Law of God (Acts 21:20).

He came to set people free from the burdens others place on them.
“If the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed.” (John 8:36)

In Psalm 119:142, the Law of God is truth, and in John 8:31-36, it is the transgression of the Law of God that puts us into bondage while the truth is what sets us free.

 

[MatthewG]

Our salvation from sin would be incomplete if we were only saved from the penalty of our sin while we continued to be doers of sin, so there is an aspect of our gift of salvation from sin that we are experiencing in the present by repenting and becoming a doer of the Law of God. Jesus saves us fro our sin (Matthew 1:21) and sin is the transgression of the Law of God), so Jesus graciously teaching us to experience being a doer of it is intrinsically the way that he is giving us his gift of saving us from not being a doer of it.

The content of a gift can be the experience of doing something, such as giving someone the opportunity to experience driving a Ferrari, where the gift intrinsically requires then to do the work of driving it in order to experience driving it, but where doing that work contributes nothing towards earning the opportunity to drive it as the result. In Titus 2:11-13, the content of our gift of salvation is described as being trained by grace to do what is godly, righteous, ad good, and to renounce doing what is ungodly, so we are not extrinsically required to be doer of those works in order to earn our salvation as the result and we are not extrinsically required to do those works as the result of having first been saved, but rather we are intrinsically required to be a doer of those works because God graciously teaching us to experience being a doer of them is part of the content of His gift of salvation. In Titus 2:14, it does not say that Jesus gave himself just to redeem us from all lawlessness but also to purify for himself a people of his own possession who are zealous for doing good works, so the way to believe in what he accomplished through the cross is by becoming zealous for doing good works in obedience to the Law of God (Acts 21:20).


In Psalm 119:142, the Law of God is truth, and in John 8:31-36, it is the transgression of the Law of God that puts us into bondage while the truth is what sets us free.

short answer :
You’re free to live under the Law if that’s what you choose, but I’m not under that covenant. I follow the law of Christ, which is to believe in Him and to love others.
Jesus said the work God requires is to believe in the One He sent (John 6:29), and He said His commandment is that we love one another (John 13:34).
That’s the freedom He gave us.



The core issue

He is saying:

“The gift of salvation is the experience of becoming obedient to the Law.
Therefore, doing the Law is part of the gift itself.”

That sounds spiritual, but it collapses the difference between:

• what saves you, and
• what saved people look like.


Scripture never merges those two.

---

What Scripture actually teaches

1. Salvation is a finished work, not an ongoing training

Jesus said, “It is finished.”
Paul said, “You have been saved” (perfect tense).
Hebrews says He “made purification for sins” once for all.

Salvation is not:

• a process of becoming obedient
• a process of being trained
• a process of learning to keep the Law


Those are results, not the gift.

2. Grace trains us — but training is not salvation

Titus 2:11–14 does say grace teaches us.
But it does not say grace is the teaching.

Grace saves.
Grace also teaches.
Those are related, but not identical.

He is merging them into one thing.

---

Why his Ferrari analogy fails

He says:

“The gift is the experience of driving the Ferrari.”

No.
The gift is the Ferrari.
Driving it is what you do because you have it.

Likewise:

• Salvation is the gift.
• Obedience is the experience of having received the gift.


He’s confusing cause and effect.

---

The subtle danger

He keeps saying:

“We are intrinsically required to do good works because doing them is part of the gift.”

That sounds humble, but it’s actually a backdoor works‑gospel.

He’s not saying:

• “Do good works to earn salvation.”
He’s saying:
• “Doing good works is salvation.”


That’s just as dangerous.

Paul warned about this exact thing in Galatians.

---

The Law problem

He keeps appealing to:

• Psalm 119
• Acts 21
• “zealous for the Law”
• “sin is transgression of the Law”


But he’s ignoring the entire New Testament teaching that:

• believers are not under the Law
• the Law was a tutor leading to Christ
• the Law’s purpose was to condemn, not empower
• the Law is fulfilled in love, not in Torah‑keeping
• the Spirit, not the Law, produces righteousness


He’s trying to drag Christians back under a covenant that was never given to Gentiles and was fulfilled by Christ.

---

What’s really going on

He’s reacting against:

• empty religion
• checklist Christianity
• hypocrisy
• legalistic church culture


You and I agree with him there.

But instead of embracing freedom in Christ, he’s building a new system where:

• obedience = salvation
• training = salvation
• doing = salvation


He’s trying to fix legalism with… a more spiritual‑sounding legalism.

 

[Soyeong]

short answer :
You’re free to live under the Law if that’s what you choose, but I’m not under that covenant. I follow the law of Christ, which is to believe in Him and to love others.
Jesus said the work God requires is to believe in the One He sent (John 6:29), and He said His commandment is that we love one another (John 13:34).
That’s the freedom He gave us.

Christ spent his ministry teaching his followers to obey the Law of Moses by word and by example, which included saying that man shall not live by bread alone but by every word that comes from the mouth of God, so I see no justification for thinking that the Law of Christ is not in perfect accordance with everything that Christ taught and every word that comes from the mouth of God, especially because the Law of Moses was given in order to teach show to believe in Christ and to love others. The reason why Jesus established the New Covenant was not to nullify anything that he spent his ministry teaching or so that we could continue to have the same lawlessness that caused it to be needed in the first place, but rather it still involves following the Law of Moses (Jeremiah 31:33, Ezekiel 3626-27). The freedom that we have in Christ is the freedom from sin, not the freedom to sin.

The core issue

He is saying:

“The gift of salvation is the experience of becoming obedient to the Law.
Therefore, doing the Law is part of the gift itself.”

Scripture never merges those two.

Jesus saves us from our sin and sin is the transgression of the Law of God, so there is an intrinsic connection between our gift of salvation and our gift of getting to experience being a doer of the Law of God.

1. Salvation is a finished work, not an ongoing training

Jesus said, “It is finished.”
Paul said, “You have been saved” (perfect tense).
Hebrews says He “made purification for sins” once for all.

Salvation is not:

• a process of becoming obedient
• a process of being trained
• a process of learning to keep the Law


Those are results, not the gift.

The Bible speaks about our salvation in the past, present, and future tenses, so we have been saved from the penalty of our sin (Ephesians 2:5), we are being saved from continuing to live in sin (Philippians 2:12), and we will be saved from God's wrath on the day of the Lord (Romans 5:9-10). Again, Titus 2:11-13 describes the content of our gift of salvation as being trained by grace to do those works, so it is something that we are experiencing in the present. In Titus 2:14, it describes what Jesus finished through the cross not just by saying that he gave himself to redeem us from all lawlessness but also to purify for himself a people of his own possession who are zealous for doing good works, so again that is something that we are experiencing in the present.

2. Grace trains us — but training is not salvation

Titus 2:11–14 does say grace teaches us.
But it does not say grace is the teaching.

Grace saves.
Grace also teaches.
Those are related, but not identical.

Again, Titus 2:11-13 describes our salvation as being trained by grace to do those works, so grace saves us by teaching us to do those works. In Psalm 119:29-30, he wanted to put false ways far from him, for God to be gracious to him by teaching him to obey the Law of Moses, and he chose the way of faith by setting it before him, so this has always been the one and only way of salvation by grace through faith.

Why his Ferrari analogy fails

He says:

“The gift is the experience of driving the Ferrari.”

No.
The gift is the Ferrari.
Driving it is what you do because you have it.

Likewise:

• Salvation is the gift.
• Obedience is the experience of having received the gift.


He’s confusing cause and effect.

My point was that the content of a gift can be the experience of getting to do something rather than an object, so the purpose of example of getting to experience driving a Ferrari was to illustrate this, so you saying that the gift is the Ferrari completely misses my point and doges the issue that the content of a git can be the experebe of getting to do something. In Titus 2:11-13, it does not say that we are saved first and then we will do those works as the result, but rather it describes the gift of our salvation as being trained by grace to do those works.

“We are intrinsically required to do good works because doing them is part of the gift.”

That sounds humble, but it’s actually a backdoor works‑gospel.

He’s not saying:

• “Do good works to earn salvation.”
He’s saying:
• “Doing good works is salvation.”


That’s just as dangerous.

Paul warned about this exact thing in Galatians.

There is a difference between these two positions:

1.) Our salvation requires us to choose to be a doer of the Law of God.

2.) Our salvation requires us to choose to be a doer of the Law of God in order to earn it as the result (works salvation).

The Bible supports 1 while denying 2 but the problem is that you are trying to use verses in Galatians that only warned against 2 in order to argue against 1. Jesus has become a source of eternal salvation for those who obey Him (Hebrews 5:9).

The Law problem

He keeps appealing to:

• Psalm 119
• Acts 21
• “zealous for the Law”
• “sin is transgression of the Law”


But he’s ignoring the entire New Testament teaching that:

• believers are not under the Law

In Romans 5-8, Paul describe the Law of God as being something that is the good that he wanted to do in contrast with the law of sin as being something that was causing him not to do the good that he wanted to do. In Romans 6:14, Paul descried the law that we are not under as being a law where sin had dominion over him, which is clearly not describing the good that he wanted to do, but rather that is the role of the law of sin. In Romans 6:15, being under grace does not mean that we are permitted to sin, and in Romans 7:7, the Law of God is not sinful but how who know what sin is, so we are still under it. Moreover, everything else in Romans 6 speaks in favor of obedience to the Law of God and against sin.

• the Law was a tutor leading to Christ

Someone who disregarded everything that their tutor taught them after their purpose had been fulfilled would be missing the whole point of a Tutor. The reason why God's Word leads us to God's Word made flesh is because he is the embodiment of it and it was given in order to teach us how to know him through following his example of embodying it, but the reason why it leads us to him was not so that we can then reject all that he is and go back to being doers of what it reveals to be wickedness. In Acts 3:25-26, Jesus was sent as the promised seed to bless us by turning us from our wickedness.

• the Law’s purpose was to condemn, not empower

In Exodus 33:13, Moses wanted God to be gracious to him by teaching him to walk in His way that he and Israel might know Him, and in Matthew 7:23, Jesus said that he would tell those who are workers of lawlessness to depart from him because he never knew them, so the purpose of the Law of Moses is to graciously teach us how to know God and Jesus, which is His gift of eternal life (John 17:3).

• the Law is fulfilled in love, not in Torah‑keeping

Love fulfills the Torah because everything in it was given in order to teach us how to love God and our neighbor.

• the Spirit, not the Law, produces righteousness

In Romans 8:4-7, Paul contrasted those who walk in the Spirit with those who have minds set on the flesh who are enemies of God who refuse to submit to the Law of Moses. God has not commanded anything that is not in accordance with walking in the Spirit, but rather He gave the Law of Moses was given in order to teach us how to embody His character traits and His character traits are the fruits of the Spirit, which is why the Spirit has the role of leading us to obey it (Ezekiel 36:26-27).

He’s trying to drag Christians back under a covenant that was never given to Gentiles and was fulfilled by Christ.

---

I have been speaking about how to live under the New Covenant.

What’s really going on

He’s reacting against:

• empty religion
• checklist Christianity
• hypocrisy
• legalistic church culture


You and I agree with him there.

But instead of embracing freedom in Christ, he’s building a new system where:

• obedience = salvation
• training = salvation
• doing = salvation


He’s trying to fix legalism with… a more spiritual‑sounding legalism.

Legalism is obeying the Law of God without regard to its purpose, so my point has been to clarify the correct purpose of obeying it. In Titus 2:14, it does not say that Jesus gave himself to free us from the Law of God but in order to free us from all lawlessness and to purify for himself a people of his own possession who are zealous for doing good works, so the way to embrace the freedom that we have in Christ is by becoming zealous for doing good works in obedience to the Law of Moses (Acts 21:20). The Law of Moses is truth (Psalm 119:142) and it is the transgression of the Law of Moses that puts is into bondage while the truth sets us free (John 8:31-36).

 

[MatthewG]

is truth

The Core Problem in His Argument

He is treating:

• The Law of Moses
• The Law of God
• The Law of Christ


as if they are the same thing.

Scripture never does that.

Paul explicitly distinguishes them (1 Corinthians 9:20–21).
Hebrews explicitly distinguishes them (Hebrews 7:12).
Jesus explicitly distinguishes them (Matthew 5:17–18).

He is mixing categories that the Bible keeps separate.

---

Where His Reasoning Breaks Down

1. He assumes “obeying the Law of Moses” = “walking in the Spirit.”

But Paul says the opposite:

• “If you are led by the Spirit, you are not under the law.”
(Galatians 5:18)


He tries to argue that “not under the law” means “not under sin,” but Paul already has a phrase for that—“under sin” (Romans 3:9). Paul doesn’t confuse the two. He uses them differently.

He’s rewriting Paul to fit his system.

---

2. He treats the Law of Moses as eternal, unchanging, and universal.

But scripture says:

• “A change of priesthood necessitates a change of law.”
(Hebrews 7:12)


If the law didn’t change, Hebrews 7 makes no sense.

---

3. He treats the New Covenant as a continuation of the Old Covenant.

But Jesus says:

• “This is the new covenant in my blood.”
(Luke 22:20)


New covenant ≠ renewed covenant.
New covenant ≠ same covenant.
New covenant ≠ Mosaic covenant with upgrades.

He’s flattening covenants that God Himself separates.

---

4. He quotes Jeremiah 31 but ignores what it actually says.

Jeremiah 31:32 says the New Covenant is:

• “NOT like the covenant I made with their fathers.”


He skips that part.

He also ignores that Jeremiah 31 never says:

• “I will put the Law of Moses in their hearts.”


It says:

• “I will put my law within them.”


God’s law ≠ Mosaic code.
God’s law existed before Moses and continues after Moses.

---

5. He confuses “salvation produces obedience” with “obedience produces salvation.”

You already nailed this.

He’s trying to smuggle works into the root instead of the fruit.

Paul says salvation is:

• By grace (Ephesians 2:8)
• Through faith (Ephesians 2:8)
• Unto good works (Ephesians 2:10)


He reverses the order.

---

The Real Issue: He Doesn’t Understand How Covenants Work

He’s trying to live in:

• Sinai
• Pentecost
• and the Millennial Kingdom


all at the same time.

He’s mixing dispensations, covenants, and audiences.

He’s trying to make the Mosaic Covenant eternal because he doesn’t understand that:

• The Law of Moses was temporary (Galatians 3:19)
• The Law of Moses was a tutor (Galatians 3:24)
• The tutor’s job ends when faith comes (Galatians 3:25)


He says rejecting the tutor is rejecting God.

Paul says staying under the tutor is rejecting Christ.

---

What You’re Actually Saying (and why it’s correct)

You’re saying:

• Salvation is by grace through faith.
• Grace trains us to live righteously.
• The Spirit produces obedience.
• Obedience is the fruit, not the root.
• The Law of Moses pointed to Christ.
• The Law of Christ is the fulfillment of what the Law of Moses foreshadowed.
• Freedom in Christ is freedom from sin, not freedom to sin.


That’s exactly what Paul teaches.

---

A Clean, Direct Summary You Can Send Back

Here’s a tight, medium‑length response with scripture, in your voice:

---

Christ didn’t establish the New Covenant so we could return to the Old one. He fulfilled the Law of Moses, not because it was bad, but because it was temporary and pointed to Him (Galatians 3:19–25). The Law of Moses was a tutor, but Paul says plainly that once faith has come, we are no longer under the tutor.

Jesus didn’t call us back to Sinai—He called us to Himself.

The Law of Christ is not a contradiction of God’s Word; it is the fulfillment of everything the Law and the Prophets pointed toward (Matthew 5:17). The Spirit writes God’s law on our hearts, not the Mosaic code, but the very character of God expressed through Christ (2 Corinthians 3:3).

Freedom in Christ is freedom from sin, not freedom to sin. But obedience is the fruit of salvation, not the requirement to earn it. Titus 2 says grace trains us to live righteously—it doesn’t say we obey first and then grace comes. Salvation is by grace through faith, and that salvation produces a life of obedience (Ephesians 2:8–10).

The New Covenant doesn’t nullify the Old—it fulfills it. But fulfillment is not the same as continuation. Hebrews says a change in priesthood requires a change in law (Hebrews 7:12). We follow Christ, not Moses, and the Spirit leads us into the righteousness the Law pointed toward but could never produce.

 

[MatthewG]

I can just come back you with ai @Soyeong.

Ai can correlate of things I’ve shared with it over the past year. And a lot of the things you believe we will be in disagreement.

You can believe however you want it’s personal to you: it makes no difference to me. I just stay where I know is best.


Sin has been taken care of by Jesus and now we live by the spirit of the resurrected Lord today.


I don’t even believe obedience is needed for salvation it’s belief.

Ai will say obedience will we tend to abide more in if anything.