So you agree that Christ described his body as flesh and bone which he further states that a spirit does not have?
I do not see what difference you are hinting at. No one is denying that the Christ is called God. No one is denying that he is Emmanuel, God with us.
So, you have some question regarding Christ not being recognized after the resurrection of his body. Ok let's review those verses that deal with the subject starting with John 20.
Mary was the first to go to the tomb and find it empty and she immediately assumed that someone stole the body because 9 "For as yet they knew not the scripture, that he must rise again from the dead". Ok so none of the flock was expecting Christ to physically rise from the dead right? So eventually while she was crying about the theft of Christ's body she perceived a person and assumed it to be the gardener. Keep in mind she was crying (visual acuity) and apparently she had not looked in his direction but for a few moments because when Christ called her by name it was then that she recognized him and it states clearly that she turned toward him since apparently she was not looking in his direction.
At this point Mary is happy and runs to give the message from Christ to the rest of the disciples. So now the disciples know he is risen physically and there is no missing body. So, Christ then appears to them on that same day and apparently those disciples had no problem recognizing Christ since there was nothing stated in the text to indicate any visual change from the disciples perspective. I would further point out that if Christ had looked quite different then the disciples would not have believed it was him since as I have already shown you none of them were expecting him to physically rise from the dead. If he had looked different then they would have considered him an imposter / liar etc. etc.
Now a week later he appears again for Thomas to examine the wounds on his resurrected body and Thomas who was a diehard disbeliever of the resurrected Christ (even after being told by everyone) as the scripture states, had no problem recognizing Christ right? Who would have had more reason to disbelieve that it was Christ than Thomas? and notice that Christ states : 29 ...Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou hast believed. Thomas saw and touched the risen savior and believed.
Now there is another account of non-recognition in Luke 24;
15 And it came to pass, that, while they communed together and reasoned, Jesus himself drew near, and went with them. 16 But their eyes were holden that they should not know him.
In these verses we find that recognition was withheld from them. If Christ did not look the same then there would be no reason for their eyes to be "holden that they should not know him". It should be quite clear that Christ was resurrected in the body he died in and made the rounds to see all of his flock and was accepted by them.
God the Father is indeed spirit only and his Son who is also considered God but is a separate being from the Father who he came from wants all his intelligent creations to worship him in spirit. Is there any reason we cannot worship him in spirit while still within the temple of our body (that they made)? When referring to worship in spirit you should understand that under the Mosaic law the people were only going through the motions of worship with their physical parts and not in a spiritual manner which is why Christ speaking to the multitudes he was quite specific about this form of spiritual sin in his sermon on the mount. here is a sample from it;
Matt 5:
27Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery:
28But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.
So you ask how could God exist in a fleshly manner in heaven... God the Father will always be spirit however, he allowed his Son to take on the fleshly form because they both loved the creation and so that we would have a man as an advocate to represent us to the Father as it is written;
1 Tim 2:
5 For
there is one God, and one mediator between God and men,
the man Christ Jesus
Because as noted above there were those who felt that simply obeying the law through fleshly works believed they were saved by those works so, the spirit was making sure that they understood that simply performing the actions of the law in our flesh does not give a heritable pass to heaven. The simple law of Moses was a beginners guide to understanding God and with it they were supposed to grasp that what God desired of man in his fleshly actions he also desired of them in their spiritual actions. I will post the rest of that part of the sermon so it can be clear what God wants and why the actions of the flesh did not give a pass to heaven;
Matt 5:
20For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed
the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.
21Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment:
22But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.
27Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery:
28But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.
29And if thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast
it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not
that thy whole body should be cast into hell.
30And if thy right hand offend thee, cut it off, and cast
it from thee:
for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell.
Did you notice the ending scripture? Why would your whole body be cast into hell if you are only going to be a spirit anyway? Why should anyone care about that which they believe will not exist after death.
You are not mistaken. If any single part prevents the understanding of the whole then it is your God commanded duty to study it to see if it is truth or error.
I am submitting to you the understanding that the spirit has opened to me (which I prayed for since a child) and I have tested the spirit as instructed against the written word. I have checked these things not simply against the 'english' translation but to the most original words possible whether they be Hebrew or greek however, in the end I am not asking you to believe in me or the words that I write on their own. I will as always direct you to the only source that can give you proper understanding.... God, so that you can pray for his guidance.