And that's the only way Michael can become Jesus. By altering the scriptures.
Shouldn't it read "Michael is the ONLY King of Kings"?
Jude 1
9 Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee.
I guess you didn’t get the gist of Ezekiel 37:24-25 but it bears repeating. An angel can never be a prince over man for ever, it is impossible!. Man is created flesh and bone while an angel is a ministering spirit sent forth to minister for them who shall be heirs of salvation, these two are of different species. Only a God-man can have rule over man, never an angel.
The word angel is also translated “messenger” whether it is written in Hebrew or Greek. Could the term “arch” preceding the word “angel” have the same meaning as that of the word “chief” found in Daniel 10:13 as “the number one” or “one of?” I believe it is so!
Angels are created after it’s kind, so is other species that ever was created. Man after it’s kind, elephants after it’s kind, rabbit after it’s kind and so forth. There are NO archangels. An angel is an angel created as a spirit being! They are not like man distinct as male and female. In fact, archangel is a
title and said to be “chief angel,” or “number one” angel, same concept as in Daniel 10:13.
There are two kingdoms at war with each other since time began. The forces of Christ and His angels against Satan and his demons. In this sense, Christ is the chief or the arch angel (Jude 1:9). Same concept as Satan is chief demon as leadership goes.
In addition, an angel is also called a messenger, and there are only three entities that fits this bill.
1 Jesus is the “chief” messenger of the Gospel (Malachi 3:1).
2 Angels are messengers that ministers on behalf of the saved (Hebrews 1:14).
3 People are messengers in that they bring the Gospel into the world (Matthew 28:19-20).
I repeat, “arch” or “archangel” is nothing more significant than a
title!
To God Be The Glory