Richard_oti
Well-Known Member
- Mar 17, 2008
- 1,170
- 741
- 113
You are aware though, that there is Instruction with regard to the washing of hands.
Nothing?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
You are aware though, that there is Instruction with regard to the washing of hands.
why to the Jew first then, someone will ask.
If you err in these lesser matters, I cannot imagine what greater matters you also err in.
I am obligated by my own conscience to obey it literally as given, as opposed to other commands where I have knowledge that permit not to observe them literally, such as festivals and abstinence from certain meats.
We are not talking about sin here are we but the law, you know that bit about teh law is made for sinners, not teh rightousess.
That is actually as sad post. Because anything that is not of faith is sin.
You obviously do not have enough faith in what Jesus Christ has done.
You think adding to your wee bit of faith is going to please God...it will not , we cannot add to the Finished work.
Also the "I fear God and want to obey Him" is a sad confession for someone who is called to be in The Bride Of Christ. Some 'happy wife'...living in fear and frightened that they will do something that brings punishment.
I know of what I speak...I too "lived there" until the 80's.
May God bless you with His Light.
I replied. You are only upset because I will not play your silly teacher/student game.
I deny your interpretation was/is the intention of Christ and his New Covenant with the houses of Israel and Judah. Rev
Yet, there is a command with regard to the washing of hands. The same command from which the "tradition" came. Your silence with regard to my earlier post was deafening.
1Pe 2:9 But ye are a elect race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for God's own possession, that ye may show forth the excellencies of him who called you out of darkness into his marvellous light:
Tell me ChristianG, do you consider yourself to be a part of the "royal priesthood" spoken of above?
It comes from the same source as the washing of hands. You are upholding and insisting that others uphold that which is NOT there.
You don't get to decide who is a sinner and who not for that is God's purview alone. We are supposed to deal with all manner of folk as Christ did. You remember Him? Called a glutton and drunkard because he dared fellowship with people the keepers of the law looked down on.Sin is the breaking of the law.
We have no more to discuss since you have avoided every single point I made and are intent on living a sinful life believing you are saved without ever having to turn from sin. You have chosen your path and I have mine and I will support the truth or oppose untruth when I see it.
I guess you missed it, Adam and Eve sinned in the garden of Eden , when was the Law given to Moses, how many years after Adam??? Sin is simply anything that we do that separates us from God or effects someone else in a bad way. And teh reason you wont discuss like many is simply because you dont desire the truth, prefer the lies.Sin is the breaking of the law.
We have no more to discuss since you have avoided every single point I made and are intent on living a sinful life believing you are saved without ever having to turn from sin. You have chosen your path and I have mine and I will support the truth or oppose untruth when I see it.
You are free to deny anything and everything and since the entirety of your response in essence is a denial of all but one commandment then tell me if there is no moral laws in the new covenant how can sin still exist since sin is the breaking of the law?
Are we free to kill people as long as we believe in Christ?
The CC felt that was an ok thing to believe in as they gave indulgences to crusaders who were killing God's enemies.
God's government must be a sinners paradise since there are no laws restricting how people must live with both God and their other creations.
That whole bit about being angry with your brother being the equivalent of murder and lusting a married person being equal with adultery must be just some stuff for those bad Jews who had lived under the law...
You don't get to decide who is a sinner and who not for that is God's purview alone. We are supposed to deal with all manner of folk as Christ did. You remember Him? Called a glutton and drunkard because he dared fellowship with people the keepers of the law looked down on.
1 John 3:6
Whoever abides in Him does not sin. Whoever sins has neither seen Him nor known Him.
In the days before and during the time of Christ, one was either of the chosen (of Israel) and under the law, or of the gentiles and not under the law. But today, and since the death of that last generation of whom Christ was the Last, the chosen are "the dead in Christ." What we have today and since then, are the gentiles (for these are the times of the gentiles), and also those who are not the chosen, but those who are born [again] of the spirit of God, born directly into God without adoption through the flesh.
In other words, we cannot choose ourselves, nor since Christ, is it even possible to be among the chosen - for He was the Last. Meaning that we being of the gentiles (not being of the chosen of Israel) are not under the law, and if we are born of the spirit of God, the law was never against God, but for Him, for He is perfect. As are we, if we are born of Him.
Therefore, the only way to be under the law during these times, is to choose ones self as chosen of God - which cannot be done.
So by your own words, I have your permission to be harsh with you, for you are stubborn, and do not see as well as you think you see.
Since I have your permission by your own words: You are deceiving yourself. You have a long way to go before you teach "exactly" what is taught in Scripture. You are missing the mark in more ways than you know. That is a fact.
You would do well to heed your own advise. For I have seen you make excuses with certain things in so that you need not uphold the law with regard to them. As you have so judged, shall come back upon your own head.
Yet, there is a command with regard to the washing of hands. The same command from which the "tradition" came. Your silence with regard to my earlier post was deafening.
1Pe 2:9 But ye are a elect race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for God's own possession, that ye may show forth the excellencies of him who called you out of darkness into his marvellous light:
Tell me ChristianG, do you consider yourself to be a part of the "royal priesthood" spoken of above?
<snip>
It comes from the same source as the washing of hands. You are upholding and insisting that others uphold that which is NOT there.
You clearly stated, and I quote:
By which, you make yourself a liar. For you are not truly doing so. And yes, by your own words, I have your permission to be harsh.
<snip the rest>
And there you go, making a clear statement that shabat has changed. Thus also, by which you excuse yourself of the fullness of it. In 1 Corinthians 5, Paul makes the clear admonishment, therefore let us keep the feast.
Everyone that replied to you, though it was done in kindness and in earnest, you retorted unto them in a manner that was less than becoming. And one of them, myself excluded, I know does in fact follow after the Instruction. Your replies showed no discernment on your part.
That is correct, which I did not mean to contradict. For the sake of understanding to whom the law was given, I stuck to those not grafted in, for clarity. But the fact remains, that those that are grafted in (and not part of the natural branches), not Israel, were never under the law. So, then, "chosen" indeed does mean something different for each in coming into Christ, but not in the end. Thank you for the opportunity to clarify.This is not so, for whoever is born of the Spirit now is indeed among the chosen, and this choice came before the foundations of the world were laid, which was on the third day of creation when dry land was caused to appear. The Gentiles who are now born of the Spirit become descendants of Abraham, and grafted into the one olive tree, Israel.
That is correct, which I did not mean to contradict. For the sake of understanding to whom the law was given, I stuck to those not grafted in, for clarity. But the fact remains, that those are grafted in (not part of the natural branches), not Israel, were never under the law. So, then, "chosen" indeed does mean something different for each in coming into Christ, but not in the end. Thank you for the opportunity to clarify.