Easy to answer if a Morman came here and started telling you the Book of Morman was the true word of God would you get upset or perhaps you lose your composer? Thats what you guys do with your Pre trib Rature theory.
The facts are facts only fools deny facts ... The pre trib rapture is not written in Gods Word its a lie of Satan and being a Bible reader we get tired of hearing this garbage doctrine of men stated as though it was Gods written truth...Now you can believe it because you chose to but do not say its written No one has ever proved its written ever thats why its called a Rapture theroy ..the drefintion of a theroy is something that cxan not be proved ... Rapture theroy was started by a young girls dream in the 1800's not ever taught by an Apostel nor is any third secret coming written... flesh and blood can not enter heaven and Satan is prince of the air so where you going.
I am only answering this for those who are confused about this and /or have eyes to see this is a false teaching of men ...not of God. but then read for yourself
1830: During the spring a young woman in Scotland, Margaret Macdonald, declared that she had discovered in the Bible what had never been seen by others: a rapture of "church" members described as a "pre-Antichrist" (or pretrib) event. Her words: "one taken and the other left" before "THE WICKED [Antichrist] be revealed." She was a partial rapturist seeing only part of the "church" raptured and the rest of the "church" left on earth. When she wrote that the "trial of the Church is from Antichrist," she meant the part of the church not included in her pretrib rapture. Leading partial rapturists including Pember and Govett have always applied the word "church" to the ones "left behind." Robert Norton, Irvingite historian and on-scene witness of Margaret's utterances, wrote that Margaret was the "first" to privately teach pretrib.
http://www.scionofzi...re_diehards.htm
PS if you can prove this article wrong you can win $1000.00
also notice none of these Pre trib rature believeers back anything with scripture just opinions and a misinterptation of an error in 1 Thess 4, which was corrected in 2 Thess. All they have is jokes a smart remarks ..its their only defense because there isnt any biblical defense ..its really quite pitful :unsure: