sounds good, i mean you could put it on a plaque or something if you like i guess, but i'm sure at least as many "Americans" would argue the "Christian Nation" thing, right, and fwiw i don't believe either one. Your political reps take a dump on the Connie the day they get to DC and begin enjoying the privileges (omg, i finally spelled that right) that the Connie specifically forbids. If they were really subject to it you guys would be talking about exercising your 2nd Amendment rights imo. Don't worry, they're not.
Speaking of what was ESTABLISHED, is one thing...
Speaking of HOW men CORRUPT what was ESTABLISHED, is another thing.
What was ESTABLISHED, was the US Constitution, which was sufficient.
What was QUICKLY "ADDED" ..
(Out of "fear" of men...
To the "detriment" of men...
was the so called, "Bill of Rights"...ie the first
10 AMENDMENTS to the US Constitution).
The Detriment IS:..
BECAUSE the "AMENDMENTS" were ADDED..
And men "NOT" paying attention to WHAT IS "IN" THE CONSTITUTION ....
WHICH IS....
IF SOMETHING IS "IN" the Constitution...
The governing Offices, and Representatives OF those OFFICES....CAN AND DO...enact LAWS...GOVERNING WHAT IS "IN" the US Constitution.
"IF" those "AMENDMENTS, had NEVER BEEN ADDED....
...THOSE RIGHTS would have (according TO the Constitution) would have by default REMANDED TO the People
"BUT" Because they APPEAR, "IN" the US Constitution...LAW MAKERS CAN AND DO, enact LAWS specific TO those Amendments.
It is the Peoples' own ERROR of IGNORANCE for Demanding and Having Agreed to "THOSE" Amendments.
And TODAY....men think those Amendments are SIMPLY guarantees of RIGHTS....when in FACT they ARE a BACKDOOR for Political Officers TO CONTROL and CORRUPT those RIGHTS.
And the Argument rolls ON.
Alexander Hamilton was a highly educated man, who at length argued AGAINST "those" Amendments......he understanding the ramifications of GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE, and enacting LAWS that in fact, CORRUPTS the LIBERTY of THE People.
God Bless,
Taken