You do not know whether Christ Jesus is going to physically return (even soon)?19. Adventist (waiting for the real and soon return of Jesus Christ in glory and power from Heaven) Unknown?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
You do not know whether Christ Jesus is going to physically return (even soon)?19. Adventist (waiting for the real and soon return of Jesus Christ in glory and power from Heaven) Unknown?
Do you believe that there is a real Tabernacle/Sanctuary/Temple in Heaven?20. Tabernaclist (all doctrine may be found in God's Temple/Tabernacle/Sanctuary) Unknown?
Did God point out the conspiracy of men and women in high office in the days of Ezekiel?21. Conspiratorialist (I believe the scriptures (KJB) point out the secret doings of men in high places) I don't think so, but I don't pursue such things...usually???
I see that you like to live nebulously, as in a place which is unsure (as Thomas), a land of may be, might be, and possibly. Have you studied to shew yourself approved unto God:22. Globist (the world/earth is a spheroid, not flat, nor domish) Likely so...
This seems to be coloured by your previous statements, however, thank you for this answer.23. Love for the Truth/Facts (no matter the field of study/topic/subject)Yes, so as not to be found in delusion
You are so concerned... but for what reason? I believe in the God who I encountered as a child of 6 years in the Catholic Church more than 70 years ago. I have gotten to know Him a lot better than I did then. I continue to move and to be moved closer to Him. This is the secret, to not remain still and stagnate.Does your 'God' have a name, and if so what is it?
Please explain the part of "parenthetical" and "problematic".24. Blood Atonement (Jesus' blood is the purchase of the whole world) Yes, on the heading, but the parenthetical phrase could be problematic.
The name was given, "Christians""And the Gentiles shall see thy righteousness, and all kings thy glory: and thou shalt be called by a new name, which the mouth of the LORD shall name." Isaiah 62:2
Yes!Another good and clear answer. Thank you. Do you then believe that the gift of prophecy and/or prophets still exists in this our day among those gifts that continue?
I had never heard her name before reading about her on one of these forums some years ago. Why would I look deeper into Joseph Smith? Why would I look deeper into Pope Francis? Why would I look deeper into the pastor of the largest Baptist Church in New York City? I have looked deeper into my own pastor, because he was my pastor... but even that through the lens of the Holy Spirit. Am I being led by the Holy Spirit or some person?Have you personally tested sister White as one who has claimed that gift? If so, how?
There is no maybe or might be, it is either yes or no. It is not meaningless or confusing to embrace the term Protestant, for it carries with it the historic weight and definition. Only those who are afraid to embrace that history, do not embrace the word itself.I do agree, but the name does not really matter that much. A name like this that does not really describe what I am for the benefit of someone I want to understand it, is meaningless or confusing.
Thank you but as I recently told another person here, not of the SDA persuasion, my wife sees to my health insofar of natural food is concerned and I pray with God. I trust my wife as my other half after 47 years. Yes, we are to be good stewards over all that God has provided, but that part of the stewardship while she remains as my spouse is given to her. I also pray for her for God to keep His hand on her so that she will also be where He wants her to be doing what He wants her to do.
Sounds like fear. I am Christian in spite of those who abuse the word by their lifestyle and definition in living. Again, you do not have the right, nor any. Satan can redefine a word and does do so and abuse that through people's lives, but that does not change the definition given by God. Judas claimed to follow Christ, but that does not change the true definition of the word Christian or the doctrine of Christ. Christians still held to the real definition in spite of all the apostates and wolves and goats. I reject the idea of "my (your) definition", as it is unscriptural. God defines, not you.I say I reserve the right not because while the word is used in scripture, people today, have already redefined it by their usage of it. My definition, if I had one, would simply be one seeking to be "Christ-like". I don't like to be lumped in with those who bear the label with little of no resemblance to Jesus and little no apparent movement toward Him.
It does not follow, that you are not a "scientist", that you cannot know the truth of the matter and take the biblical stand. Peter, James and John were not 'scientists' in the modern sense of the abused word. Science (from Latin scientia) simply means knowledge.Yes, I glanced into those links and saved them for reference myself. I am not an evolutionist, but neither am I a scientist
Very dangerous position to take. "Hopefully"? God says that we can know for certain, and be sure:... although I have my own ideas about science, which a genuinely pure scientist might appreciate, but I don't know any of those. My beliefs on this are biblical although I have not categorized so neatly as you. I have my Bibles which I read and I have my notes on my computer which are tremendously long, since they consist of many of my own writings as well as of others of interest. My conclusions hopefully are God's
That was your past, not your present. That was your old man, not the new man, and the old man is dead in trespasses and sin and knows nothing. Only the living man may know.but I would not now even try to put them down like you did. They have changes since I was a Catholic more than once... yet my first encounter with God was when I officially became a Catholic at 6 years old when a priest baptized me.
Study is the wrong way to get God's answer. Study as per the verse you quoted. as I understand it, is to be approved "unto God"... not to receive the Truth. Yes we are to study, but the key is the lead of the Holy Spirit. That way, study without the lead of the Holy Spirit, is the way of the flesh as Solomon was inspired to write about 3,000 years ago:I see that you like to live nebulously, as in a place which is unsure (as Thomas), a land of may be, might be, and possibly. Have you studied to shew yourself approved unto God:
2Ti_2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
That when persons come to you with another doctrine, another teaching, you may clearly show them the good and right way, and lead them out of error? If no, what you are saying, is that you are a sign post that says, unknown distance to destination, a way point that says you might be going the right way, but then again maybe not, or a light whose colours are neither green, yellow or red, but simply blinking "???".
Many false doctrines exist in these the last days, and every wind of them howls, and when such comes up, we need to stand upon the foundation of God's word, unmoved, and point men to the truth, even a Moses called, who is on the Lord' side, come stand by me (as he says).
Which one?, What is God's name that you believe in? For scripture says:Thank you for your simplicity. I guess I am simple in a sense, but I do believe in God.
Then you believe God inspired the writers with God's name as being? What of the Ten Commandments itself where God spake aloud God's own name in glory and majesty and power surroudned by ten thousand time ten thousand and thousand of holy angels from Heaven?I do believe that what is written in the Bible was written as God inspired the writers.
I am not condemning anyone, I am simply pointing out the nebulous position you continually take. it isn't caution, it is fear.I move cautiously about condemning others for where they are or where they are not
God still working, does not say anything about the truths which God has clearly given to us, which we may boldly stand upon., as I do not know all things and I have not yet overcome all of the world as I see it, not yet... But God is still working on me.
Loving the Truth does not mean that we know all of the Truth. People, early on in the walk with and toward God know Jesus, but not as well as He can be known. We need to love Him, the Truth, unconditionally even when we don't know, but only follow Him by faith. People presume that they must know it all to truly love him, but no... We want to know Him better because we love Him but we love him already even though much may still be sight unseen:This seems to be coloured by your previous statements, however, thank you for this answer.
You already stated that, by saying you were not "trinitarian". That does not address what I have shared in the matter of "trio".Briefly I do not embrace any kind of a three in one God.
What is the definition of "one" that is given here? What is the definition you carry, and is it scriptural?I embrace one God.
Tautology.What I believe, is only a belief.
Yet you replied to a statement I made. Did you intend to discuss the statement made and that you made, or is this a hit and run?My knowledge is that God exists. I studied this thing for years and discussed it in too much depth with too many people on this and other forums.
This is clearer in regards your position.I have talked to God about it many times. I won't get into an in depth discussion with you on it here. I believe in God the Father. I believe that Jesus His Son is also God, but the Holy Spirit is not separate entity nor a connected part of any trio, or triune or trinity.
That is a heresy, scripturally speaking, and ought to be discussed.Rather the Holy Spirit or Holy Ghost is a special manifestation of the Father.
That is also a heresy (dualinity), scripturally speaking, and ought to also be discussed.If God is multiple in any way, I would lean more toward a duality than a trinity, but I also won't call that absolute.
Tautology. Godhead explained Godhead to some extent in scripture, though the fullness thereof cannot ever be understood by the finite (us).God is what He is.
I believe in Him and I ask Him to let me what He knows that I need to know when I need to know it. Me writing a lengthy dissertation on what I believe or know is not going to change what God is or what He not
This is a discussion forum, and the point of this thread is for such discussion of what you believe, not simply to state what you believe and leave. The OP clearly states that there ought to be good "reasons" for the belief stated.
I embrace and love the Word of God, which is Jesus. You apparently love Jesus, but please do not try to tell me what I need to know or to embrace as if you knew my heart. God does know my heart as He knows every heart. Ultimately only He may lead us correctly. For this reason He sent His Son and He sent the Holy Ghost. I am one of His sheep:There is no maybe or might be, it is either yes or no. It is not meaningless or confusing to embrace the term Protestant, for it carries with it the historic weight and definition. Only those who are afraid to embrace that history, do not embrace the word itself.
Where? please link to it here. Thank you.I think I answered your questions on this point on another post on this thread already.
In your mind it is "OK". I do not agree with the sentiment at all. I think it is a denial of the plainest statements of God on the matter.We disagree and that is OK.
That is irrelevant to the matter at hand. It is bringing in another subject entirely.Not everyone is at the same place on the highway of holiness toward becoming like Him.
Again, irrelevant and differing topic.Not everyone is to have precisely the same function in the Body of Christ.
Never in question, and not the subject at hand.What is written in our hearts by the Holy Spirit is what matters.
Only those who cannot sustain their position from scripture, and who desire to not have this revealed, leave the subject as such.I am glad that God gave men written Bibles, but let us leave that for the moment.
Fear? You are speaking of fear of man. I am speaking of communication. People have changed the meaning of words. Would it help a native Californian who only speak English for me to testify to him in Spanish? Perhaps we are not communicating so well here. If you want to discuss this, I am willing, but please do not presume I don't know anything about God the things of God. I don't know everything, but I also have never any human being that did. The only one I always trust to be right is God. He alone knows me better that I know me.Sounds like fear. I am Christian in spite of those who abuse the word by their lifestyle and definition in living. Again, you do not have the right, nor any. Satan can redefine a word and does do so and abuse that through people's lives, but that does not change the definition given by God. Judas claimed to follow Christ, but that does not change the true definition of the word Christian or the doctrine of Christ. Christians still held to the real definition in spite of all the apostates and wolves and goats. I reject the idea of "my (your) definition", as it is unscriptural. God defines, not you.