You are officially disqualified as an honest teacher.Gee - and I thought you anti-Catholic geniuses stated that Jesus forbade us to call ANYONE a "Teacher" (Matt. 23:7).
Ummmm, what happened to that??
Shame on you, Roman Catholic
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
You are officially disqualified as an honest teacher.Gee - and I thought you anti-Catholic geniuses stated that Jesus forbade us to call ANYONE a "Teacher" (Matt. 23:7).
Ummmm, what happened to that??
The Pope to Roman Catholicism is God’s Oracle on earth.Ahhhhh, more of your patented ignorance.
The Pope doesn't "make up new laws", Einstein.
He defines what the church has always believed and taught.
Didn't you ever teach your kids to do their homework?
Maybe YOU should have taught them by example . . .
Feeding Jesus’ sheep qualifies us as shepherd also?And as I proved to you before, Einstein - that's NOT what Jesus said . . .
John 21:15-19
When they had finished breakfast, Jesus said to Simon Peter, “Simon, son of John, do you love me more than these?” He said to him, “Yes, Lord, you know that I love you.” He said to him, “FEED MY LAMBS.”
He then said to him a second time, “Simon, son of John, do you love me?” He said to him, “Yes, Lord, you know that I love you.” He said to him, “TEND MY SHEEP.”
He said to him the third time, “Simon, son of John, do you love me?” Peter was distressed that he had said to him a third time, “Do you love me?” and he said to him, “Lord, you know everything; you know that I love you.” [Jesus] said to him, “FEED MY SHEEP.
Amen, amen, I say to you, when you were younger, you used to dress yourself and go where you wanted; but when you grow old, you will stretch out your hands, and someone else will dress you and lead you where you do not want to go.”
He said this signifying by what kind of death he would glorify God. And when he had said this, he said to him, “Follow me.”
In case you didn't know - "feeding lambs" and "tending sheep" - that's the job of a shepherd . . .
That’s right - only the Church’s bishops are entrusted and empowered to provide the correct interpretation of Scripture. This not only ensures that the faithful receive the correct teaching, it ensures unity, which is a sign of the true Church. The chaotic disunity that results from individual interpretations of Scripture cannot possibly be the work or the will of God, since God is not the author of “confusion” (1Cor 14:33).
Jesus is the Good Shepherd who works through his Church to lead and protect his flock from false teaching. Eph 4:4-16 says Christ has provided the gift of the CHURCH (v.11) to “equip the saints … until we all attain the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to mature manhood … so that we may no longer be children, tossed back and forth and carried along by every wind of doctrine.”
There is no mention of Scripture in that entire passage, let alone any suggestion of relying on one’s own interpretation of Scripture.
1John 5:16 states that there are “deadly” sins. A “deadly” sin is presumably a sin that is so serious that it can lead to spiritual death and endanger one’s hope of salvation. So a “deadly” sin can mean the difference between going to Heaven or ending up in Hell, yet the NT doesn’t explain what these “deadly” sins are. If you rely simply on Scripture, you have no way of knowing what “deadly” sins are, so disciples of Sola Scriptura are like blind men wandering around in a mine field, hoping they don’t step on something “deadly”. How do you know you are not committing a “deadly” sin (or two), if you have no idea what they are?
Catholics know what “deadly” sins are, because their Church teaches them what the Scriptures fail to.
So what. That doesn't prove Satanists are RUNNING the Vatican. It's interesting that you accept one line from a late interview from Sr. Lucia, but reject the message of Fatima. You should find out what that message is, instead of fear mongering misrepresentations of Paul VI.
OR, you wouldn't have to wait if you would simply do your homework on Jack Chick and his bizarre life and beliefs . . .
Ummmmm, where did Jesus say, "I am the 'ONLY' shepherd."Feeding Jesus’ sheep qualifies us as shepherd also?
He clearly said there was only 1 Shepherd(Himself).
He said “My sheep hear my voice”, so now his voice is someone else?
Did he stutter?
Are you into multiple shepherdism?
Sooooo, if you admit that Chick lied about that - WHY would you trust him about anything else??I disagree with Jack Chick when he says all Catholics are going to hell. How's that for homework by the scripture in proving all things with His help?
And YOU officially screwed up your Scriptural condemnations . . .You are officially disqualified as an honest teacher.
Shame on you, Roman Catholic
TRANSLATION:The Pope to Roman Catholicism is God’s Oracle on earth.
Crazy stuff
Sooooo, if you admit that Chick lied about that - WHY would you trust him about anything else??
If you would quote scripture only, and not some past Pope, you might qualify for partial truth.And YOU officially screwed up your Scriptural condemnations . . .
TRANSLATION:
"You caught me in another lie - and now I have NO recourse."
Par-for-the-course, Einstein . . .
John 10...Ummmmm, where did Jesus say, "I am the 'ONLY' shepherd."
Chapter and Verse, Einstein . . .
Funny you should say that because in our conversations - I've only quoted Scripture when making a theological point.If you would quote scripture only, and not some past Pope, you might qualify for partial truth.
Try it, as hard as it is, to spend a day without reading extra Biblical commentary.
No preservatives added.
Okay - now show me the verse when Jesus says He is the "ONLY Shepherd".John 10...
16 And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd.
Right?
No - anything that can be proven by Scripture is okay.So when Jack Chick says Jesus Christ is the Savior, you would dismiss that as well? No, you would not.
I prove everything by the scripture in the KJV with Jesus Christ since He is my Good Shepherd.
No - anything that can be proven by Scripture is okay.
It's the rubbish he says that CAN'T be proven by Scripture, like "Catholics aren't saved" - and there's PLENTY of that nonsense in his tracts . . .
Try grasping this, good RCC shepherd....Okay - now show me the verse when Jesus says He is the "ONLY Shepherd".
Still waiting . . .
You are half way there.Funny you should say that because in our conversations - I've only quoted Scripture when making a theological point.
I've quoted history when making an historical point.
Learn the difference, Einstein . . .