Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
That is why we rely on the ancients to translate the ancient, and the modernists to translate the modern....No. We know what it means. But we also know the nuances of words that English CANNOT convey. The Bible was NOT written in English. I'm sure you also think in Revelation Hot is good, Cold is bad right?
Ancient Greek is a goner.Do you think we know Latin?
Who has come up with "new and improved" meanings? This is the same lie you keep putting forth without any proof or basis in reality. You have been brainwashed.Ancient Greek is a goner.
Face it, we cannot keep coming up with new and improved meanings.
Imagine what the Bible(s) will look like in another 400 years....ugh!
And the ancients WROTE IN GREEK. You are so ignorant on all of this.That is why we rely on the ancients to translate the ancient, and the modernists to translate the modern....
KJV ancients were ancient, unlike modern fellas.And the ancients WROTE IN GREEK. You are so ignorant on all of this.
You guys do.Who has come up with "new and improved" meanings? This is the same lie you keep putting forth without any proof or basis in reality. You have been brainwashed.
Do you think that every bit of what God consists of is inside Jesus' body?
Or,just every bit of God's "traits or qualities"?
Again, making a claim with no proof. Just lies and brainwashed ignorance.You guys do.
from the pulpit every Sunday/Wed...."Hi folks, let's look at the deeper meaning of the scripture...."
Beats welcoming the latest translation to our redefinition collection.Again, making a claim with no proof. Just lies and brainwashed ignorance.
Let's detail it now.Yes.
Yes.
John 14:
[10] Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? ...
[11] Believe me that I am in the Father, and the Father in me: ...
John 10: 30
[30] I and my Father are one.
Glory to God,
Taken
Again, more accusation with now basis in reality.Beats welcoming the latest translation to our redefinition collection.
Just a question....Again, more accusation with now basis in reality.
Let's detail it now.
Jesus was filled with the Holy Ghost on earth per Luke 4:1, which made him one with his God(Father).
After he resurrected, he was filled with every bit of what his omnipresent God consists of, bodily, per Col 2:9.
To accomplish this, God had to make him a quickening spirit and omnipresent, bodily, after resurrecting him.
Jesus was created as a redo of the first Adam by the same God as the first Adam.What is your point?
The original manuscripts.Just a question....
Which translation is the pure word of God per your point of view?
No close, but pure?
Jesus was created
as a redo of the first Adam by the same God as the first Adam.
One Adam broke us and the next Adam fixed us.
God Himself was neither Adam, but both Adam's were son's of God.
The last Adam is the celebrated one and God reigns over mankind THROUGH him.
BTW...The last Adam, which is God by default per the Col 2:9 effect on his new spirit body, is still allowed to be an individual person with a God per Rev 3:12.
No, the word of God is God's word, just like your word is not a person, but it comes from a person.Disagree!
The Word of God WAS NOT CREATED!
The Word of God WAS REVEALED in the FLESH LIKENESS as a man, given the Name JESUS, given the status, the only begotten, Son of God.
Glory to God,
Taken
They don't exist.The original manuscripts.
No, the word of God is God's word, just like your word is not a person, but it comes from a person.
God creates with his word.
God word was also made flesh, like it made everything else in John 1:3(Gen 1).
God spoke Jesus into existence in Matt 1.