1.But I'm not you, you do understand that?
2. You are assuming I am now as you were then. When the reality is that you are writing back and forth with this guy online that you've never met, have no real knowledge of his life, and these are only your assumptions and opinions.
3. So, as so many do, you appear to feel free to share your negative opinions of me to whomever will listen, as you endeavor to convict me of sin.
4. Why do you assume I have a hard heart? Why do you say this to me?? Because I disagree over the meaning of "saint"?
I Numbered your point so that I can answer them individually.
1. I Understand and never implied you are me, I am judging you by what you have written to me here on line. As I said previously, you have desire for Truth, and your heart is in the right place, but you are afraid of error and this leads to you being cautious of the move of the Spirit. I am not the Only one that sees this in you.
2. No, I am sharing how I was then, to give you some of my history, whether you relate to my past or not is irrelevant. the Point I am making is that conviction from the Holy Ghost is either received with repentance or with a hardened heart. You would not be Offended if you were not convicted, and the Words of Tozer who never knew you personally convicted you, not my words, He was a Holy Spirit led teacher of the Word, one of the last that was truly Holy Spirit taught and not produced in the seminaries of textualism, and worth reading if you have not.
3. Up until this point I have had nothing but a favorable opinion of you, you are again reading negativity because of the Conviction the Holy Spirit is bringing to you in this topic. I want interaction, I want you questioning my positions as iron sharpens iron. I am not offended by your questioning nor offended by your rejection of what I am trying to teach you, I would rather you be a Berean and search the scriptures to see if it is so. This how fellowship of the Spirit works. It is not all exhort, exhort exhort, as the article I posted stated, but there is reproof and rebuke involved as well. Love for a brother is not always pleasant, I have two natural brothers of my own, and the same can be said of those relationships, sometimes we rubbed each other the wrong way, but we were still brothers, and we can learn from one another.
4. I do not assume that, I said this "animosity" you are reading in my posts is the conviction of the Holy Spirit my words are bringing to you. There are two reactions to this conviction, a hardening of the heart is one of them and true Godly repentance and growth the other. That is why I highlighted, (Capitalized and emboldened the word "IF" in that comment. The Point being that I do not want this to lead to a hardened heart and animosity between us. I would rather defer from debating you and interacting with you if this is going to be the result.
This is what I mean by "above your pay grade". Do You understand?
You tell me I'm afraid, afraid of God, afraid of you, that I have limited understanding and capability, that I'm not spiritual, That's just off the top. You all but accuse me intellectual dishonesty, you say that I'm having a hard time grasping things,
There you go again, reading an insult where there is none. I am just trying to tell you that this is not a debate worth having because it will lead to a hardened heart, because you are being offended by what I write, instead of seeing it as iron sharpening iron.
When I began to refute your assertions with Scripture, you started making it person, and haven't stopped.
Again, this is all coming from your end, not my end. You are perceiving an attack on your person when this is not the case on my end. Look back at when this began in our discussion and you will see this, as this began when I gave you the scriptural backing on where in scripture the concept of saints dying is spoken of. I was responding scripturally to a question you had and gave you very many scriptural responses to this query on your part, but all you saw was my mention of textualism being an attack on you. YOU never responded to those scriptures which I gave you to answer your question, and instead reverted to being offended at what I wrote. So If you really want to continue to discuss the scripture of this point I am making go back to that comment and respond to the scriptures i gave you instead of ranting about how offended you are by my comments. Go Back to comment number 36 and respond from there in a scriptural way and we can continue this discussion in a fruitful way, but
IF You are going to be offended by the discussion then there will be no fruit in it.
the choice is yours. Go back and reread comment 36 and respond without being offended, for no offense was on my heart there.