Stan B
Well-Known Member
I didn't say that. Their chosen outcome was to eventually give birth, which indeed they did.You're playing word games now. A miscarriage is not a chosen outcome.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I didn't say that. Their chosen outcome was to eventually give birth, which indeed they did.You're playing word games now. A miscarriage is not a chosen outcome.
Ummmmm, NEWSFLASH:1. You are stuck with the fact that Daniel says that the Antichrist is the Prince of the peo0ple who destroyed Israel in the 1st century:
26Then after the sixty-two weeks the Messiah will be cut off and will have nothing.
Then the people [Romans] of the Prince [Prince of Rome] who is to come will destroy the city and the sanctuary. The end will come like a flood, and until the end there will be war; desolations have been decreed. 27And he will confirm a covenant with many for one week,i but in the middle of the week he will put an end to sacrifice and offering. And on the wing of the temple will come the abomination that causes desolation, until the decreed destruction is poured out upon him.” Dan 9:27
2. If you think Jerusalem is the City of the Whore: “And the kings of the earth, who committed acts of immorality and lived sensuously with her, will weep and lament over her when they see the smoke of her burning," Rev 18:9 And her smoke rose up for ever and ever. Rev 19:3
Doesn't sound like the Holy City, the Holy Place, the Throne of David, where Christ is going to set up His Throne in the Millennial Kingdom, amidst the fire, smoke and ashes that arise forever from that permanently destroyed city?
First of all - get your FACTS straight.Bishop and iconic church historian Eusebius, in his second book against Sabellius, expressly declares that since a word is not in the Scriptures, it is not satisfactory to him. He speaks to the following effect: "As inquiring into truths which admit of investigation, it is indolence, so prying into others, where scrutiny is expedient is audacity. Into what truths then ought we to search? Those truths we find recorded in the Scriptures. But what we do not find recorded there, let us not search after. For had the knowledge of them been incumbent on us, the Holy Spirit doubtless would have placed them there."
"Let us not hazard ourselves in such a risk, but speak safely; and let not anything that is written be blotted out."
"Speak what is written, and strife will be abandoned."
Eusebius was persecuted and murdered by Rome for declining to kiss pagan Roman butt; and from your comments, Rome's hatred of truth hasn't changed in 2.000 years.
Notwithstanding, for those of us who have read the BIBLE, Sola Scriptura was the very last message left to us in Scripture:
"I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues that are written in this book; and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his part from the tree of life and from the holy city, which are written in this book." Rev 22:18
Your choice: God of the Bible . . . . or god of Rome!
From what I hear, that's common. When they realize it really was a person.I wonder if any women, now in their old age, feel regret, remorse and guilt when they think "That baby I aborted would be 50 years old now", or don't they care?
OR, when unBiblical anti-abortion cults send them on a guilt trip. :-(From what I hear, that's common. When they realize it really was a person.
Much love!
No, I think it's when they realize it was a person. At least, that's been what I've heard from those I've known who have had abortions. Not to many, just a few.OR, when unBiblical anti-abortion cults send them on a guilt trip. :-(
The only thing "unBiblical" about the Pr-Life position is YOUR refusal to accept God's truth.OR, when unBiblical anti-abortion cults send them on a guilt trip. :-(
No - we're not ALL agreed.I think we're all agreed that if continuing a pregnancy would pose serious health risks for the mother, the abortion option should be on the table for her after discussing the situation with family, friends and doctors.
Likewise, if scans would show the fetus to be seriously malformed the abortion option should be there.
Your comments on the mother breathing for them, confirms the millennia-old belief held by those who are interpreting directly from the original Hebrew, that they remain part of the mother's body, until the umbilical cord is severed and the infant takes its first breath; the time when the Spirit of God breathes into its nostrils, the Breath of Life., i.e a VIABLE LIVING BEING!! One who can survive with the new body God has given them.No, I think it's when they realize it was a person. At least, that's been what I've heard from those I've known who have had abortions. Not to many, just a few.
I know you think personhood doesn't come til they breath, but the mother breathes for them, and gives them life in the oxygen that passes through their blood. The life is in the blood, and there is life in their blood.
It's not buying into somebody's guilt trip, it's coming to see clearly with spiritual maturity, that's what I see happening.
Abortion is murdering a person who thinks and feels and moves, who wakes and sleeps, who feels pleasure and pain. A person who knows their mother and father. All of these are known in medical science.
Much love!
chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://antilogicalism.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ecclesiastical-history.pdfI am quoting from:
The Ecclesiastical History of Eusebius Pamphilus
Bishop of Cesarea, in Palestine
Translated from the Original
with an Introduction by Christian Frederick Cruise
And a Historical View of the Council of Nicea
by Isaac Boyle
Baker Book House
Grand Rapids Michigan
Library of Congress Card Number 55-10437
ISBN 0-8010-3306-3
Fourteenth Printing, June 1990
about 600 pages
I also have the complete 38 Volumes of the Early Church Fathers which contain the works of Eusebius as well.
Thank You, DanielI am quoting from:
The Ecclesiastical History of Eusebius Pamphilus
Bishop of Cesarea, in Palestine
Translated from the Original
with an Introduction by Christian Frederick Cruise
And a Historical View of the Council of Nicea
by Isaac Boyle
Baker Book House
Grand Rapids Michigan
Library of Congress Card Number 55-10437
ISBN 0-8010-3306-3
Fourteenth Printing, June 1990
about 600 pages
I also have the complete 38 Volumes of the Early Church Fathers which contain the works of Eusebius as well.
No, it does not. And I do not.The Bible says they are NOT a person until God breathes into them the breath of life, but you say the Bible is perpetrating a lie!
And you've ALREADY been shown that God is SPIRIT (John 4:24).Your comments on the mother breathing for them, confirms the millennia-old belief held by those who are interpreting directly from the original Hebrew, that they remain part of the mother's body, until the umbilical cord is severed and the infant takes its first breath; the time when the Spirit of God breathes into its nostrils, the Breath of Life., i.e a VIABLE LIVING BEING!! One who can survive with the new body God has given them.
Not my idea; God's idea: that's what the Bible says. So the only issue is whether you believe the Bible, or the satanic teachings of some anti-God cult!!
Throughout Scripture, Genesis, Job, Ezekiel, Revelation, the essence of life is having the Breath of Life in their nostrils. No exceptions throughout Scripture!
You say that abortion is murder, the murder of a person who thinks and feels and moves, who wakes and sleeps, who feels pleasure and pain.
The Bible says they are NOT a person until God breathes into them the breath of life, but you say the Bible is perpetrating a lie!
1. Can you provide a single instance where Scripture says abortion is wrong??
2. Can you provide a single instance from Scripture that says a fetus is a living being before it has been born??
Good idea!! Stay out of it!No, it does not. And I do not.
Quote the place, let's see if that's what it says. Contrary to what every mother knows.
Actually, nevermind. I have no interest in debating abortion with you. Sorry!
Much love!
We've already been through all of that. You just don't listen!What e breathed into Adam was LIFE, according to Gen 2:7.
The SAME life He breathed into John the Baptist in his mother's womb when he was leaping for joy when he came near his unborn, LIVING Savior, Jesus.
You've LOST this debatre - but you can't admit it . . .
I think you're brainwashed by Planned Parenthood and Dems who get FILTHY rich murdering babies.I am quoting from:
The Ecclesiastical History of Eusebius Pamphilus
Bishop of Cesarea, in Palestine
Translated from the Original
with an Introduction by Christian Frederick Cruise
And a Historical View of the Council of Nicea
by Isaac Boyle
Baker Book House
Grand Rapids Michigan
Library of Congress Card Number 55-10437
ISBN 0-8010-3306-3
Fourteenth Printing, June 1990
about 600 pages
I also have the complete 38 Volumes of the Early Church Fathers which contain the works of Eusebius as well.