Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
We are not allowed to call them patients- not in the care home language !!Patients been difficult today...?
Have a good night!
There is good and bad in all health care - Germany has a good health service, but it's expensive , however they can see pretty much anyone in a very quick time.I did a lot of research for on the European model versus US model for healthcare. Neither are perfect, but you can get better healthcare much faster in the US.
The point is it isn't free. In Europe your health tax doesn't pay for all care. It also comes out of the general tax fund. You pay a lot more in taxes than we do.
Your system restricts which procedures you can get a lot more than Medicare does.
You talk about having to wait. I had a serious issue beginning of the year. On the telephone my doctor said call an ambulance.
I had complete examinations and surgery and went home in less than two weeks. Then he put me on home visits from nurses.
That would've not happened in Europe.
My health cost for Medicare with supplemental is $125 a month. My state and federal taxes are zero.
I do grant you that younger people have a lot more struggles. But for anything serious you just go to the emergency room and they get treated at taxpayer expense.
I live in an area that has a huge senior population, including me. At 68 years old I am one of the youngest in my subdivision.
In fact my wife has an issue. She is going for surgery May 1.
There is no good solution to healthcare. Having served in elected office it is always a balance between cost, want and need. But I want my doctor of my choosing determining what I need, not a politician or bureaucrat.
There is good and bad in all health care - Germany has a good health service, but it's expensive , however they can see pretty much anyone in a very quick time.
You said about your health issue that required emergency treatment, surgery and aftercare, then state that ' it would happen in Europe - well in Germany it would , and in the uk it would too. If you go into casualty and it is serious , or an issue that requires treatment straight away, you are admitted, seen, surgery offered and aftercare when you go home. It is true it would not happen with things that are not considered urgent, however in Germany it would. I cannot vouch for other European countries as I don't kow much about the health services elsewhere.
We do have alternatives in the UK, private health care - but that's way out of my budget !
I don't know all that much about the health care in the US, just really what has been the case with friends who live there. I am presuming that it must vary from state to state, as many of them struggle to get treatment for certain things.
We have not always had a national health service, and the poor couldn't always get the treatment they needed unless the local doctor took pity on them, this was why Mr Beverage decided it was time for a change- and it worked really well for years, you didn't have to wait for treatment back then. I don't think people were opposed to paying either, they saw it as a way of helping one another, and themselves - it was post war, and maybe that whole experience had influenced how people felt about one another.
It has changed, it's not perfect, but it's all I have as a resident here.
Rita
Yes, I got your point, but I am not entirely sure why you felt the need to make it as I was not endeavouring to convey our health service, or anyone else's as being perfect!
So I guess we agree on something ! Lol
Rita
Ok, I have no idea what is being conveyed - but one thing I will say about the NHS is that it was set up to help the poorer people within society- of course it costs and we know it is not free, but how much do you, or other Americans care about those within your society who cannot afford to get the health insurence or care that some of you can enjoy, or even the young people. This is one of the underlying questions. Even you have conveyed that ' your system is good for you at the moment ' - but, as an example, what about my sons friend, is it fair that she has to have that door closed to get a problem sorted. Or the other member of this forum who could no longer get the pain meds that was needed.
The point I raised in my earlier post about the origins of the health service, people knew it would cost, but they cared about others - enough to be willing to pay in on behalf of others, it is only the workers that contribute - the elderly, sick, disabled , children ect do not contribute.
The whole issue was about ' caring '.
About looking outside of yourself and doing something for others.
The downside is that I do not think things were as corrupt then as they are now !
Rit
This is not a competition, think how big your country is compared to Britain.
Ok, so they put money in so why can't this young girl get the carpal tunnel sorted out, why can't pain meds be made avaliable - if the money is there within the system you have. This isn't to undermine what you have conveyed, this is to try and understand- does it vary between states, are some better for health care than others.?
My whole point was there is no such thing as a perfect system but from all my studies over all US has the best health care system.
That does not mean there is not a lot of things in the fixed.
Ok, thanks for the list, slightly worried as the USA isn't on the list !
Didn't you say earlier that over all it was the best, so why isn't it at the top !!
Luxembourg is in Europe - it's top, you were quite critical of European health care in earlier posts......so something is not adding up !
Granted the UK is quite low on the list, but I do know Europe has a better system.
Rita
Is that totally true though. My daughter and family live in USA and they are well off, at the top of the heap. But I don't hear from them about how wonderful it is there.
I remember our brother Truth on this forum. I believe he went to five hospitals with his wife in agony with Cancer...wanting and needing help.
They were turned away.
Finally APAX from this site, posted a list of clinics and hospital places...Truth took his wife to one of them and they were wonderful to them...and saw her through to the sad end.
Not sure all things are equal there ( as everywhere) CoreIssue.
I didn't say it was wonderful here. But compared to the rest of the world it is better.
We have several big cancer centers around where we live. A Cancer Treatment Centers of America.
A major cancer group is associated with a hospital chain with one hospital about 5 miles from. My national insurance is in their network, but it does not require you to use that network.
It is a Medicare advantage coverage.
When you say turned away I backed the I bet they were actually referred elsewhere. The standard practice is referral.
And if they are well off how in the world do they not have insurance?
Ok, thanks for the list, slightly worried as the USA isn't on the list !
Didn't you say earlier that over all it was the best, so why isn't it at the top !!
Luxembourg is in Europe - it's top, you were quite critical of European health care in earlier posts......so something is not adding up !
Granted the UK is quite low on the list, but I do know Europe has a better system.
Rita