Warren v. District of Columbia - Wikipedia
I studied about that in my Administration of Justice class ans was surprised that your right
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Warren v. District of Columbia - Wikipedia
Show me what you're talking about.
Is there something specific in that video you wanted me to comment on, or are you more interested in griping about the overall situation?
If this were happening from any other group but a so-called civil rights group, they would not be handling it with kid gloves. Instead, they are basically saying: "We are going to give in to the criminals, leave our precinct, and give them whatever they want. How is this not terrorism by BLM and Antifa? You can't make threats against the police. I can't make threats. I certainly can't take over several city blocks. It's simply a loosely organized criminal enterprise intimidating the police and country.
If I knew you could do anything if you did it in Floyd's name, and I was that kind of person, I'd go rob a bank while carrying a Black Lives Matter sign. As nuts as that sounds, at this point, I almost believe it would work.
It's true that no one should depend on the police for protection. That's a myth, really. Any good police officer would do his best to protect citizens, but it's not their primary job, and of course, it's impossible for them to protect everyone. They apprehend criminals, they aren't our armed guards. You want armed guards, you have to hire them.Warren v. District of Columbia - Wikipedia
The Police are Not Required to Protect You — Barnes Law
This is how we see the Police stand by in Democrat Cities when the Liberal Communists Rampage and attack people, burn buildings, tear down statues or deface property or even loot. But get a handful or "Proud Boys" defend themselves and start winning the fight with ANTIFA, and the police are on them like flies on a turd!
Good grief. You claimed there were no armed guards, remember? The police say otherwise. Do I have to spoon-feed you everything?Is there something specific in that video you wanted me to comment on, or are you more interested in griping about the overall situation?
She said they "have been hearing about" alleged armed guards at the barricades, and that if anyone saw that to call 911. That's not "the police said there are armed guards", is it?Good grief. You claimed there were no armed guards, remember? The police say otherwise. Do I have to spoon-feed you everything?
It's true that no one should depend on the police for protection. That's a myth, really. Any good police officer would do his best to protect citizens, but it's not their primary job, and of course, it's impossible for them to protect everyone. They apprehend criminals, they aren't our armed guards. You want armed guards, you have to hire them.
Very interesting. Do you know why our local police departments are functioning more like an army these days?sure if you watch this:
I'm sure the parents don't care one bit about your opinion of them.I have a low opinion of any "parent" that would drag a child to a protest that more times than not, turns violent?
Where did you see that?What kind of parent uses their child as a shield?
That's good policing....just mace the entire group even if 99% of them didn't do anything.It only takes one person to throw something at the Police for them to respond to the whole crowd! Mace is not a laser or a sniper-rifle! You spray an area and sweep across.
Everyone who was there.We hear that the "Protesters" were maced "unprovoked..." Who said that?
You really have issues man.Did they ask the Police why they maced the crowd? Nope!
Mace is not a precision weapon. It would be hard to "target" precisely one child in a crowd. The race card has lost its luster, now they are dragging out children.
I'm sure the parents don't care one bit about your opinion of them.
A coward lobs a bottle from within your group, your group earns the pleasure of a response. The "protest" has then turned violent. Just parade a child in front of you like a Muslim sends missiles from next to a school... you can then scream how the people responding are "targeting" CHILDREN!That's good policing....just mace the entire group even if 99% of them didn't do anything.
So now you've made two unsubstantiated claims. You first said they used the child as a shield and now it's that someone threw something at the police.A coward lobs a bottle from within your group, your group earns the pleasure of a response.
Get help dude. Seriously, get help.The "protest" has then turned violent. Just parade a child in front of you like a Muslim sends missiles from next to a school... you can then scream how the people responding are "targeting" CHILDREN!
Very interesting. Do you know why our local police departments are functioning more like an army these days?
This is what Obama said in a campaign speech before being elected POTUS.
In a long campaign speech, he dropped this little bomb: "We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."The chickens have come home to roost! Now, I’m not saying this is all his fault. Globalist Republicans and Democrats have both contributed to this problem, and Trump has played his part.
So...when you complain about our local police functioning more like our military, you know who is to blame.
So now you've made two unsubstantiated claims. You first said they used the child as a shield and now it's that someone threw something at the police.
Where's your evidence for either?
LOL! Obama mentioned the Peace Corps before making that statement, but since when was the Peace Corps as “powerful” as the military?? Read what Obama said again.Q: Is Obama planning a Gestapo-like “civilian national security force”?
A: This false claim is a badly distorted version of Obama’s call for doubling the Peace Corps, creating volunteer networks and increasing the size of the Foreign Service.
FactCheck.org
What did you find interesting in the video?
Still no evidence that this person used their child as a shield or that anyone threw something at the police. Yet I guarantee you'll stick with your made-up narrative.
I never said they did.Where is your evidence that the police "targeted' a child? Totally unsubstantiated!
Where's my proof that something didn't happen? Um....that would be the complete lack of evidence that it did. And if you're just going to wave away the eye witness testimony of all the people there, there's nothing left to say. Like I said, you need help.Where is your proof that the Police were not provoked to push people back with mace? Of course, all you have is the protesters "word" and nothing else! Unsubstantiated!
Where did I claim that anyone threw a bottle? Can you read?So now you've made two unsubstantiated claims. You first said they used the child as a shield and now it's that someone threw something at the police.
Where's your evidence for either?