I don't know what the next step is. Its not a good situation whichever way nayone deals with it. If you leave the radicals alone then they just build and build towards their objective. Even if that is developing a nuclear weapon. The same bombs that reahed Isreal could very well one day have a nuclear weapon attached. Thats the reality.
Yet if anyone tries to negociate as we have seen time and time again with all these radical groups. They lie and play games and will never keep any peace treaty. They have admitted that even if Isreal or the west gave them everything they wanted they will still aim to destroy Isreal and the west by extension.
Any attempts to stop them only emboldens them like all suicidal and radical ideologies will end up doing. Even sacrificing and mudering their own people to achieve that aim.
This is something beyond what any decent people can reason with. We are damned if we don't and damned if we do.
At the same time if someone is constantly attacking you sooner or later it will get to a point where they can no longer accept such attacks and will bite back. Something the Islamist are encouraging.
That mentality seems to be spreading. Maybe that was their aim all along. That they would stir division and hate among the west that this ideology will infect peoples minds and they will also start fighting and resisting.
The following information was taken from an organization called ICAN- The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear weapons. Their assessment is fair and accurate, and they are facts that anyone can research. It is EXTREMELY important to understand Iran's view on nuclear weapons compared to the jewish manipulation of our media and the narrative they have been giving us for the last 30 years at least about " IRAN BEING ON THE VERGE OF HAVING A NUCLEAR WEAPON", which NEVER WAS THE CASE. It was and is all made up..... propaganda.
So, please read these short paragraphs.
Does Iran have nuclear weapons?
No. Iran has a well-developed nuclear energy programme which is for non-military purposes. Iran’s nuclear programme has aroused international concern, however, the United States and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) continue to assess that Iran is not currently pursuing weapons-related activities.
Iran’s recent nuclear activities are nevertheless very concerning, as they shorten the period of time it would take to develop a nuclear weapon if it chose to do so. Iran’s enrichment of uranium to higher levels and its refusal to comply with all international inspections and investigations since the U.S. abandoned the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, better known as the Iran nuclear deal, in 2018 and reimposed sanctions, are at issue.
Iran has several research sites, uranium mines, a research reactor and several uranium enrichment facilities. Its programme began in the 1950s with support from the U.S under the “Atoms for Peace” program. Iran has been a party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) since 1970 and so it is legally bound not to develop or acquire nuclear weapons.
In 2015, following talks with the five original nuclear-armed states, China, France, Russia, the UK and the US, plus Germany, Iran agreed to limitations on its nuclear programme, including the enrichment of uranium and reduce the size of its stockpile of enriched uranium, in return for the lifting of sanctions.
In 2018, then President Trump took the US out of the JCPOA deal and reimposed sanctions. In response, Iran has incrementally violated provisions of the deal in an apparent effort to put pressure on the other parties to the deal to bring the US back into compliance. Under President Biden, efforts to agree to a US return to the deal and an Iranian return to complete compliance have so far been unsuccessful.
The situation has, in fact, deteriorated sharply. In June 2025, Israel launched major airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, and the United States followed with air strikes on suspected nuclear sites Natanz, Fordow and Esfahan — actions that ICAN has condemned as illegal and a dangerous........
( In other words, everything was fine until cuck Trump at the behest of net and yoohoo took us out of the deal, which brought back restrictions on Iran EVEN THOUGH they were in accordance with the agreement. Of course they had every right to be angry.
They had regular inspections which showed NO evidence of nuclear weapons development. Only civilian development and use.)
Currently, there are 9 countries that possess nuclear weapons, 6 countries that host them and 28 countries that officially endorse them.
1): Of the 28 countries that endorse the use of nuclear weapons, IRAN IS NOT ONE OF THEM.
2): ISRAEL is the only country in the Middle East that possesses nuclear weapons ( approximately 90).
3): IRAN has been part of the Nuclear Non- Proliferation Treaty ( NPT) since 1970.
ISRAEL is not part of the NPT. Israel has never officially confirmed or denied possessing nuclear weapons.
4): IRAN'S STANCE ON NUCLEAR WEAPONS:
Officially, Iran maintains that nuclear weapons are religiously forbidden (haram). This stance is anchored in a fatwa (religious ruling) issued by Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, which states that the development, stockpiling, and use of weapons of mass destruction contradict Islamic teachings.
(Official Doctrine): State officials, including President Masoud Pezeshkian, cite the fatwa as the definitive framework for Iran's nuclear program, arguing that it permanently prohibits the pursuit of nuclear weapons.
ISRAEL'S STANCE ON NUCLEAR WEAPONS:
The Samson Option is a term used by military analysts to describe Israel's alleged "last resort" deterrence strategy of massive nuclear retaliation if the country faces imminent military destruction or an existential threat.The Core PrincipleThe strategy dictates that if Israel's conventional military forces are entirely overwhelmed and the state is on the verge of collapse, it would deploy its undeclared nuclear arsenal against its adversaries to ensure that its enemies are destroyed along with it. The strategy serves as a doomsday insurance policy meant to deter a total, coordinated onslaught by hostile nations.
Unlike standard Cold War deterrence models like Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD), which were built to prevent nuclear warfare between two similarly armed superpowers, the Samson Option acts as a asymmetric threat intended to deter a final conventional defeat by regional adversaries.
So, really consider the HYPOCRISY here. Israel (along with it's servant the U.S. military) can wipe out the entire Middle East but if any country wants to retaliate and prevent them from continual wars and genocide THE WHOLE WORLD IS THREATENED BY A NUCLEAR HOLOCAUST.
SO PLEASE, who is the greater threat?
If Iran was so hell-bent on developing a nuclear weapon, they had 47 YEARS TO DO SO.
We are being lied to. And once again innocent lives don't mean anything. And soon ( I pray not) the U.S. will be deploying ground troops because Iran must be neutralized for the sake of GREATER ISRAEL.