bukka
Well-Known Member
Amen, Prayer Warrior. Giuliani hasn't been known as a man of veracity much like his master, Trump. This damages the case of the Biden emails, I think.
BREAKING NEWS--Biden Secret Emails
- Thread starter Prayer Warrior
- Start date
-
- Tags
- biden
-
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Amen, Prayer Warrior. Giuliani hasn't been known as a man of veracity much like his master, Trump. This damages the case of the Biden emails, I think.
bukka
Well-Known Member
When evidence is given, Prayer Warrior, sometimes, the character of the witness becomes relevant as well as its source.
October 17, 2020
Beyond Hunter’s MacBook: Email account of his ex-busines partner reveals high level Chinese group bought hidden access to Biden at the White House
By Thomas Lifson
The evidence establishing a shocking pattern is now clear: Hunter Biden and his busines partners sold access to Joe Biden when he was the Obama administration’s point man on China. This took place during the period when US jobs were being exported to China by the millions. Hunter earned many millions of dollars and funneled a share of that money to his father, in return for selling out American workers.
An entirely new source – a business partner of Hunter Biden who has “flipped” and granted full access (i.e., his username password) to years of his Gmail email account – reveals that access to then-VP Biden in the White House was granted in 2011 to a high level group of member of the Chinese Communist Party with a keen interest in US trade policy, as that policy was being formulated.
Breitbart has an exclusive story, co-authored by Peter Schweizer, who received access to the email trove of Bevan Cooney, formerly Hunter Biden’s partner in crime, and now serving time in federal prison for a fraud that he claims he was the fall guy for, taking the heat for Hunter.
Moreover, the MacBook hard drive emails have been authenticated by at least two people whose emails were found on it and who verify that the hard drive contains their true communications.
The long and detailed Breitbart article should be read in full to understand the magnitude of the email records. The 23,000 emails on it are still being reviewed, and more will be released in the days ahead. Here are few words of context from it:
The visit was logged in at the White House, but thegroup's meeting with VP Biden was concealed. However, proof that it took place was found on the internet because a member of the group boasted about it:
Read the rest of this article here: https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...idden_access_to_biden_at_the_white_house.html
Beyond Hunter’s MacBook: Email account of his ex-busines partner reveals high level Chinese group bought hidden access to Biden at the White House
By Thomas Lifson
The evidence establishing a shocking pattern is now clear: Hunter Biden and his busines partners sold access to Joe Biden when he was the Obama administration’s point man on China. This took place during the period when US jobs were being exported to China by the millions. Hunter earned many millions of dollars and funneled a share of that money to his father, in return for selling out American workers.
An entirely new source – a business partner of Hunter Biden who has “flipped” and granted full access (i.e., his username password) to years of his Gmail email account – reveals that access to then-VP Biden in the White House was granted in 2011 to a high level group of member of the Chinese Communist Party with a keen interest in US trade policy, as that policy was being formulated.
Breitbart has an exclusive story, co-authored by Peter Schweizer, who received access to the email trove of Bevan Cooney, formerly Hunter Biden’s partner in crime, and now serving time in federal prison for a fraud that he claims he was the fall guy for, taking the heat for Hunter.
Moreover, the MacBook hard drive emails have been authenticated by at least two people whose emails were found on it and who verify that the hard drive contains their true communications.
The long and detailed Breitbart article should be read in full to understand the magnitude of the email records. The 23,000 emails on it are still being reviewed, and more will be released in the days ahead. Here are few words of context from it:
From prison, Cooney provided Schweizer with written authorization, his email account name, and password to his Gmail account to retrieve these emails. He authorized, in writing, the publication of these emails— notable because it is the first time a close associate has publicly confirmed Hunter’s trading on his father’s influence.
The emails offer a unique window into just how the Biden universe conducted business during the Obama-Biden Administration. These associates sought to trade on Hunter Biden’s relationship with, and access to, his father and the Obama-Biden White House in order to generate business.
For instance, on November 5, 2011, one of Archer’s business contacts forwarded him an email teasing an opportunity to gain “potentially outstanding new clients” by helping to arrange White House meetings for a group of Chinese executives and government officials. The group was the China Entrepreneur Club (CEC) and the delegation included Chinese billionaires, Chinese Communist Party loyalists, and at least one “respected diplomat” from Beijing. Despite its benign name, CEC has been called “a second foreign ministry” for the People’s Republic of China—a communist government that closely controls most businesses in its country. CEC was established in 2006 by a group of businessmen and Chinese government diplomats.
CEC’s leadership boasts numerous senior members of the Chinese Communist Party, including Wang Zhongyu (“vice chairman of the 10th CPPCC National Committee and deputy secretary of the Party group”), Ma Weihua (director of multiple Chinese Communist Party offices), and Jiang Xipei (member of the Chinese Communist Party and representative of the 16th National Congress), among others.
The emails offer a unique window into just how the Biden universe conducted business during the Obama-Biden Administration. These associates sought to trade on Hunter Biden’s relationship with, and access to, his father and the Obama-Biden White House in order to generate business.
For instance, on November 5, 2011, one of Archer’s business contacts forwarded him an email teasing an opportunity to gain “potentially outstanding new clients” by helping to arrange White House meetings for a group of Chinese executives and government officials. The group was the China Entrepreneur Club (CEC) and the delegation included Chinese billionaires, Chinese Communist Party loyalists, and at least one “respected diplomat” from Beijing. Despite its benign name, CEC has been called “a second foreign ministry” for the People’s Republic of China—a communist government that closely controls most businesses in its country. CEC was established in 2006 by a group of businessmen and Chinese government diplomats.
CEC’s leadership boasts numerous senior members of the Chinese Communist Party, including Wang Zhongyu (“vice chairman of the 10th CPPCC National Committee and deputy secretary of the Party group”), Ma Weihua (director of multiple Chinese Communist Party offices), and Jiang Xipei (member of the Chinese Communist Party and representative of the 16th National Congress), among others.
The visit was logged in at the White House, but thegroup's meeting with VP Biden was concealed. However, proof that it took place was found on the internet because a member of the group boasted about it:
Curiously, the Obama-Biden visitor logs do not mention any meeting with Vice President Joe Biden. But the Vice President’s off-the-books meeting was revealed by one of the core founders of the CEC. In an obscure document listing the CEC members’ biographies, CEC Secretary General Maggie Cheng alleges that she facilitated the CEC delegation meetings in Washington in 2011 and boasts of the Washington establishment figures that CEC met with. The first name she dropped was that of Vice President Joe Biden.
Read the rest of this article here: https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...idden_access_to_biden_at_the_white_house.html
I would say the character of the witness is always relevant, but sometimes the evidence speaks for itself. ^^^
Last edited:
Bobby Jo
Well-Known Member
Yep, YOU NAILED THAT ONE. Rudy Giuliani bought the "NEW YORK POST" newspaper so that he could produce a BUNCH of FAKE E-MAILS about a MEETING between JOE BIDEN and a Burisma Executive; FAKE PICTURES & VIDEO of HUNTER (Robert Hunter Biden) having intimate relations with women and PUBLISH THE GOREY DETAILS; and Joe Biden hasn't said one DENIAL or his Lawyers made one LAWSUIT.
Ummmmmmmmm, certainly there is something FAKE, and it's @Giuliano 's FAKE HONESTY! :)
But it could be WORSE, -- if ALL Christians were as "HONEST".
Bobby Jo
bukka
Well-Known Member
The evidence in this case may speak for itself, Prayer Warrior. If it's derived from a Russian disinformation specialists, it will, perforce become questionable in a court of law and may be impeached or disallowed later on. Given that this comes out shortly before the election, the intention of this supposed information is, arguably, only meant to deceive and so for those who are skeptical about it have good reason to remain skeptical.
It's too bad that too many bad characters are involved in the genesis of this story.
I have a feeling we ain't seen nothin' yet! I'm predicting an avalanche of evidence against the former VP. I just hope it gets out in time.
Bobby Jo
Well-Known Member
I have to say @Giuliano I see more gossip coming from you than from the women....This is evil.
And it will not go unpunished ... but the sooner the better.
Eccles. 8:11 Because sentence against an evil deed is not executed speedily, the heart of the sons of men is fully set to do evil.
Bobby Jo
In September 2019, Giuliani got into a shouting match on CNN and admitted asking Ukraine for help in digging up dirt on Biden. He was seeking foreign influence on the American election.
Wow, this video is so heavily edited, it's impossible to determine context of any statements made. This is bad journalism. I would expect no better from The Washington Post!
Seven of Nine
Well-Known Member
Exactly, my point. That's the reason why I disregard all of the sanctimonious political rhetoric coming from Trump's supporters. Why should we listen to any of them complaining about Biden when they don't have an ounce of moral credibility to stand on because they support Trump? If honesty and the personal character of the President was truly an important moral issue for these conservatives, then they wouldn't support Trump, let alone repeatedly disregard his unchristian behavior. IOW, their judgments against Biden mean absolutely nothing. Hollow words.
It looks to me like another half-baked scheme from Rudy Giuliani to smear Biden. What else does the Trump campaign have?
What interests me at the moment about the NY Post article are the many inconsistencies and the possibility that there was another Russian attempt to influence another election. I find it fascinating too that Steve Bannon is involved somehow. He too his share of globe-trotting trying to curry favor with politicians from other nations.
Bannon is already facing criminal charges. So far Giuliani hasn't been indicted; but some of his pals have been. I'll skip the part about the plot of his friends to defraud investors and get to the political stuff.
Former Associates of Rudy Giuliani, Lev Parnas, David Correia, Charged with Conspiring to Defraud Investors | Chief Investment Officer
Parnas and Correia were also charged along with Igor Fruman and Andrey Kukushkin in a four-count indictment alleging that they conspired to violate the ban on political donations and contributions by foreign nationals.I wonder if the illegal contributions were to Democrats or Republicans?
In addition to several charges related to violating election laws that carry prison sentences ranging from five to 20 years, Parnas and Correia were charged with one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, which carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison.
Well, Parnas is now cooperating with prosecutors; and my guess is he, if anyone, has a good idea where the phone came from.
I was also amused that Giuliani said Hunter was drunk when he showed up to drop off the phone. The people at the store said they couldn't identify the person.
It's amusing since Michael Cohen says Giuliani is drunk most of the time himself. I think he might be plastered in this photo taken of him with Parnas. Why couldn't he wipe his own mouth? Good grief!
If Rudy wants to smear other people to curry favor with Trump, it's probably fair to scrutinize him. I don't find him a reliable trustworthy person.
He lied terribly four years ago, trying to damage Hillary Clinton.
Giuliani sorry for falsely accusing Clinton of claiming to be in NYC on 9/11
Donald Trump surrogate and former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani lobbed a new false charge against Hillary Clinton — that she claimed to have been in the city on 9/11. He admitted a few hours later that he was incorrect.
"But I heard her say one day that she was there that day," Giuliani said at a Trump rally in Ocala, Florida. "I was there that day. I don't remember seeing Hillary Clinton there."
Giuliani later recanted the assertion. "I made a mistake. I'm wrong and I apologize," Giuliani told The Associated Press Wednesday.
What else could he do after photos of her walking beside him surfaced? Okay if someone says Hillary lies, I'll agree -- but the fact remains Giuliani is a notorious liar himself. Her being a liar doesn't make him a honest person. I'd trust him as far as I could throw a horse.
Rudy Giuliani is in league with Donald Trump, so we shouldn't expect him to be an honest man.
Last edited:
Is this all you have to say? This works both ways, you know. You've been complaining about Trump ad nauseum, but do you think that what Biden has done is okay?
October 17, 2020
How The Mainstream Media Covered For Joe Biden
By David Keltz
Before Twitter decided that removing “harmful" content need only apply to articles that expose the corruption of Joe Biden or anyone affiliated with the Democratic Party, the mainstream media was already doing the bidding for Big Tech.
Last year after President Donald Trump accused former Vice President Joe Biden of having direct knowledge of his son Hunter Biden’s affairs with a Ukrainian Natural Gas company called Burisma, the mainstream media dismissed the allegations as a mere conspiracy talk. For a media that is intent on digging into, dissecting, extrapolating, and distorting every single utterance from Trump, this matter did not require any serious investigative journalism.
Incredibly, Biden was already on record bragging about threatening to withhold aid to Ukraine, unless the prosecutor who was investigating the board of the company that Hunter served on was fired. At a Council on Foreign Relations event in 2018, Biden recalled to the audience his role in having the Prosecutor General Victor Shokin fired, “I said: ‘We’re leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor’s not fired, you’re not getting the money.’ Well, son of a bitch, he got fired.”
The lack of journalistic curiosity surrounding why it was in our national interest, or under what grounds a sitting United States vice-president had the authority to withhold aid from one of our allies unless the prosecutor from a foreign country was fired, was not something that the mainstream media was willing to explore.
The only plausible explanation for the media’s malpractice is that Joe Biden was likely to be the Democratic nominee for president, and any news that Hunter Biden used his father’s office in a corrupt pay-for-play scheme would be disqualifying. Given that Hillary Clinton’s dishonesty surrounding her email scandal damaged her credibility in 2016, the media was not interested in lending credence to the idea that Biden improperly used his office while he was vice-president.
At a Democratic primary debate last year, Biden emphatically denied any wrongdoing. "My son did nothing wrong. I did nothing wrong," Biden said. Following the debate, CNN wrote this headline, “Joe Biden offers forceful defense of his son's Ukraine work at Democratic debate.” Evidently Biden’s “forceful” defense was sincere enough for CNN to absolve him of any wrongdoing. Of course, when Trump accurately denied that he colluded with the Russian government to interfere in our election, CNN decided not to believe his “forceful” defense and instead chose to mislead the American people for three years.
The New York Times, apparently satisfied that there was nothing to see, wrote, “…no evidence has surfaced that the former vice president intentionally tried to help his son by pressing for the prosecutor’s dismissal.”
Around the same time as the Times article came out, Buzzfeed published an article titled, “Trump’s Attacks On Hunter Biden Have Gone Nowhere, But He Can’t Let Them Go.”
After a U.S. Senate Committee released a damning report that revealed that Joe Biden had met with with Hunter’s business partner, Devon Archer, at the White House, a mere five days before the vice-president visited Ukraine, Buzzfeed published another article discrediting the report, titled, “Republicans’ Hunter Biden Report Is Filled With Old, Unsubstantiated Allegations And Debunked Theories.”
These so called “old unsubstantiated allegations” from the Senate report also revealed that, less than one month after Joe Biden met with Archer at the White House, both he and Hunter joined the board of Burisma, and over the next several years, both were “paid millions of dollars from a corrupt Ukrainian oligarch for their participation on the board.”
At the same time that he was described in the press as the “public face of the administration’s handling of Ukraine” Joe Biden was never asked what the purpose of his White House meeting with Archer was, or why his son received $50,000 per month to serve on the board of a Ukrainian company despite having no knowledge, experience, or background related to energy policy.
The Washington Post tried their best to discredit Trump, writing at the time, “After the reports on Hunter Biden’s business deals emerged, Joe Biden told reporters: ‘I have never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings.’ Trump claimed that this was a lie because “he’s already said he spoke to his son.” But Biden had not.”
The Post article went on to say, “Biden never said he spoke to his son, as Trump claimed he did.”
If that sounded confusing that’s because the Post meant it to be. Was the Postclaiming as a matter of fact that Biden had never spoken to his son about his dealings with Burisma, or merely saying that Biden himself was claiming that he had never spoken to his son about Burisma? It’s not entirely clear, but regardless, both of those claims by the Post turned out to be false.
Joe Biden did in fact discuss Burisma with his son, and we know this to be true because he told us. During a radio interview in New Hampshire last year. Biden said, “At one point that it came out that [Hunter] was on the board [of Ukrainian gas company Burisma]. I said, ‘I sure hope to hell you know what you’re doing.' Period. I said that.” Hunter Biden corroborated his father’s claims when he told The New Yorker something similar to that effect last summer, “As Hunter recalled, his father discussed Burisma with him just once: “Dad said, ‘I hope you know what you are doing,’ and I said, ‘I do.’ ”
Evidently, Hunter also hoped his father knew what he was doing.
On Wednesday the New York Post revealed that Joe Biden was not only aware of his son’s involvement with Burisma but was an active participant in Hunter’s business dealings.
The Post reported that Hunter Biden received an email from a top executive from Burisma, thanking him for setting up a previously undisclosed meeting with his father at the White House on April 17th, 2015.
This not only reveals that Joe Biden misled the public about his knowledge of his son’s businesses dealings with Ukraine, but that he may have conducted U.S. foreign policy in a manner that put his son’s businesses interests ahead of the country that he was sworn to serve.
One would think the mainstream media would consider that a hot story.
Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/10/how_the_mainstream_media_covered_for_joe_biden.html
How The Mainstream Media Covered For Joe Biden
By David Keltz
Before Twitter decided that removing “harmful" content need only apply to articles that expose the corruption of Joe Biden or anyone affiliated with the Democratic Party, the mainstream media was already doing the bidding for Big Tech.
Last year after President Donald Trump accused former Vice President Joe Biden of having direct knowledge of his son Hunter Biden’s affairs with a Ukrainian Natural Gas company called Burisma, the mainstream media dismissed the allegations as a mere conspiracy talk. For a media that is intent on digging into, dissecting, extrapolating, and distorting every single utterance from Trump, this matter did not require any serious investigative journalism.
Incredibly, Biden was already on record bragging about threatening to withhold aid to Ukraine, unless the prosecutor who was investigating the board of the company that Hunter served on was fired. At a Council on Foreign Relations event in 2018, Biden recalled to the audience his role in having the Prosecutor General Victor Shokin fired, “I said: ‘We’re leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor’s not fired, you’re not getting the money.’ Well, son of a bitch, he got fired.”
The lack of journalistic curiosity surrounding why it was in our national interest, or under what grounds a sitting United States vice-president had the authority to withhold aid from one of our allies unless the prosecutor from a foreign country was fired, was not something that the mainstream media was willing to explore.
The only plausible explanation for the media’s malpractice is that Joe Biden was likely to be the Democratic nominee for president, and any news that Hunter Biden used his father’s office in a corrupt pay-for-play scheme would be disqualifying. Given that Hillary Clinton’s dishonesty surrounding her email scandal damaged her credibility in 2016, the media was not interested in lending credence to the idea that Biden improperly used his office while he was vice-president.
At a Democratic primary debate last year, Biden emphatically denied any wrongdoing. "My son did nothing wrong. I did nothing wrong," Biden said. Following the debate, CNN wrote this headline, “Joe Biden offers forceful defense of his son's Ukraine work at Democratic debate.” Evidently Biden’s “forceful” defense was sincere enough for CNN to absolve him of any wrongdoing. Of course, when Trump accurately denied that he colluded with the Russian government to interfere in our election, CNN decided not to believe his “forceful” defense and instead chose to mislead the American people for three years.
The New York Times, apparently satisfied that there was nothing to see, wrote, “…no evidence has surfaced that the former vice president intentionally tried to help his son by pressing for the prosecutor’s dismissal.”
Around the same time as the Times article came out, Buzzfeed published an article titled, “Trump’s Attacks On Hunter Biden Have Gone Nowhere, But He Can’t Let Them Go.”
After a U.S. Senate Committee released a damning report that revealed that Joe Biden had met with with Hunter’s business partner, Devon Archer, at the White House, a mere five days before the vice-president visited Ukraine, Buzzfeed published another article discrediting the report, titled, “Republicans’ Hunter Biden Report Is Filled With Old, Unsubstantiated Allegations And Debunked Theories.”
These so called “old unsubstantiated allegations” from the Senate report also revealed that, less than one month after Joe Biden met with Archer at the White House, both he and Hunter joined the board of Burisma, and over the next several years, both were “paid millions of dollars from a corrupt Ukrainian oligarch for their participation on the board.”
At the same time that he was described in the press as the “public face of the administration’s handling of Ukraine” Joe Biden was never asked what the purpose of his White House meeting with Archer was, or why his son received $50,000 per month to serve on the board of a Ukrainian company despite having no knowledge, experience, or background related to energy policy.
The Washington Post tried their best to discredit Trump, writing at the time, “After the reports on Hunter Biden’s business deals emerged, Joe Biden told reporters: ‘I have never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings.’ Trump claimed that this was a lie because “he’s already said he spoke to his son.” But Biden had not.”
The Post article went on to say, “Biden never said he spoke to his son, as Trump claimed he did.”
If that sounded confusing that’s because the Post meant it to be. Was the Postclaiming as a matter of fact that Biden had never spoken to his son about his dealings with Burisma, or merely saying that Biden himself was claiming that he had never spoken to his son about Burisma? It’s not entirely clear, but regardless, both of those claims by the Post turned out to be false.
Joe Biden did in fact discuss Burisma with his son, and we know this to be true because he told us. During a radio interview in New Hampshire last year. Biden said, “At one point that it came out that [Hunter] was on the board [of Ukrainian gas company Burisma]. I said, ‘I sure hope to hell you know what you’re doing.' Period. I said that.” Hunter Biden corroborated his father’s claims when he told The New Yorker something similar to that effect last summer, “As Hunter recalled, his father discussed Burisma with him just once: “Dad said, ‘I hope you know what you are doing,’ and I said, ‘I do.’ ”
Evidently, Hunter also hoped his father knew what he was doing.
On Wednesday the New York Post revealed that Joe Biden was not only aware of his son’s involvement with Burisma but was an active participant in Hunter’s business dealings.
The Post reported that Hunter Biden received an email from a top executive from Burisma, thanking him for setting up a previously undisclosed meeting with his father at the White House on April 17th, 2015.
This not only reveals that Joe Biden misled the public about his knowledge of his son’s businesses dealings with Ukraine, but that he may have conducted U.S. foreign policy in a manner that put his son’s businesses interests ahead of the country that he was sworn to serve.
One would think the mainstream media would consider that a hot story.
Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/10/how_the_mainstream_media_covered_for_joe_biden.html
Y
Out of idle curiosity, I took you off ignore. If you want to watch the entire circus, here it is. Giuliani says (5:46) he didn't ask Ukraine for help investigating Biden, then he said he did. Enjoy all twenty eight minutes. First he says he didn't ask Ukraine help to investigate Biden. Then he says he did. The man can't keep his stories straight. Consider now that this was a year ago -- the Republicans in the Senate looked into all this and said, "Nothing here." So then Rudy goes to the NY Post to peddle his story.
It's quite amusing to hear him talk about money laundering after we discover he had pals who got arrested for that.
When the FBI says these things are true, I may find them a lot more credible.
October 17, 2020
Biden responds viciously when asked about the Hunter Biden revelations
By Andrea Widburg
It was disgraceful that, during ABC’s “faux” townhall, George Stephanopoulos did not ask Joe Biden about the contents of the computer that Hunter Biden abandoned at a repair shop. When CBS News’s Bo Erickson dared to ask Biden that question, Biden didn’t even attempt an answer. He lashed out angrily at Erickson for daring to ask the question.
Erickson posed the question while Biden was preparing to board a gas-guzzling private jet. Speaking respectfully, he said, “Mr. Biden, what is your response to the New York Post story about your son, sir?”
Biden instantly went on the attack:
Biden’s problem, of course, is that there are no answers to that question because the facts are damning. There’s no longer any question about the documents’ veracity. The computer belonged to Hunter, and the documents on it tell a sordid tale.
Regarding Ukraine, in early 2014, not long after Hunter joined Burisma’s board, despite lacking any qualifications, he received an email from Vadym Pozharskyi, a top Burisma executive, asking Hunter for “advice on how you could use your influence” for Burisma. A year later, Porzharskyi wrote Hunter a note in which, among other things, he thanked Hunter for “giving [him] an opportunity to meet with your father and spend some time together.”
The relationship between Burisma and the Obama-Biden administration flourished. In December 2015, the Obama administration let a Democrat public relations firm working with Burisma participate in a conference call regarding Biden’s upcoming visit to Ukraine as the administration’s point man. After the meeting, the p.r. firm sent an email with the conference minutes to Porzharskyi, Hunter, and Hunter’s partner, Devon Archer (the nephew of Whitey Bulger, the crime boss).
A short time later, Biden went to Ukraine. While there, he threatened to withhold a billion dollars in foreign aid unless the Ukrainian administration fired Victor Shokin, a prosecutor investigating Burisma. We know about Shokin’s firing at Biden’s behest because Biden proudly boasted about it.
Read the rest of this article here: https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...asked_about_the_hunter_biden_revelations.html
Biden responds viciously when asked about the Hunter Biden revelations
By Andrea Widburg
It was disgraceful that, during ABC’s “faux” townhall, George Stephanopoulos did not ask Joe Biden about the contents of the computer that Hunter Biden abandoned at a repair shop. When CBS News’s Bo Erickson dared to ask Biden that question, Biden didn’t even attempt an answer. He lashed out angrily at Erickson for daring to ask the question.
Erickson posed the question while Biden was preparing to board a gas-guzzling private jet. Speaking respectfully, he said, “Mr. Biden, what is your response to the New York Post story about your son, sir?”
Biden instantly went on the attack:
I know you’d ask it. I have no response. It’s another smear campaign. Right up your alley. Those are the questions you always ask.
The only things Biden forgot to do were to call Erickson “fat” and either challenge him to a push-up contest or offer to take him behind the airplane and beat the crap out of him.
Biden’s problem, of course, is that there are no answers to that question because the facts are damning. There’s no longer any question about the documents’ veracity. The computer belonged to Hunter, and the documents on it tell a sordid tale.
Regarding Ukraine, in early 2014, not long after Hunter joined Burisma’s board, despite lacking any qualifications, he received an email from Vadym Pozharskyi, a top Burisma executive, asking Hunter for “advice on how you could use your influence” for Burisma. A year later, Porzharskyi wrote Hunter a note in which, among other things, he thanked Hunter for “giving [him] an opportunity to meet with your father and spend some time together.”
The relationship between Burisma and the Obama-Biden administration flourished. In December 2015, the Obama administration let a Democrat public relations firm working with Burisma participate in a conference call regarding Biden’s upcoming visit to Ukraine as the administration’s point man. After the meeting, the p.r. firm sent an email with the conference minutes to Porzharskyi, Hunter, and Hunter’s partner, Devon Archer (the nephew of Whitey Bulger, the crime boss).
A short time later, Biden went to Ukraine. While there, he threatened to withhold a billion dollars in foreign aid unless the Ukrainian administration fired Victor Shokin, a prosecutor investigating Burisma. We know about Shokin’s firing at Biden’s behest because Biden proudly boasted about it.
Read the rest of this article here: https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...asked_about_the_hunter_biden_revelations.html
You also seem to find CNN, ABC News, MSNBC, the Washington Post, etc. to be credible.
