Eternally Grateful
Well-Known Member
Theory?Nope, I don't assume Nicodemus was there. I assume what the bible eludes to and I have already been over that.
Another lie. I have responded to it multiple times. Your theory is that since He didn't use the word baptism He didn't mean baptism. I accept what has been taught for 2,000 years. You reject it. We have talked about this already.
Goodness....
Its just common sense
If I tell you that in order to be part of my company, you have to do these steps. Yet I leave one of the steps out and people come after and try to tell you that you must also do this step.
Either I was fraudulent and insincere when I told you what you needed to do, or the person who is trying to tell you to add a step is lying to you.
Now I do not think Jesus is fraudulent, or forgot to mention something so important.
He told nicodemus how to be born again. Believe, period. Thats it.
Some church coming a few hundred years later and saying he meant baptism. Is decieving people. And calling Jesus irresponsible