Chaos Theory What Makes an Accident?

[lforrest]

Lets not conflate sources of uncertainty into one unified explanation.

If you ask a physicist to explain the double slit experiment they will come up with quantum string theory. But ask @ScottA and he will have a better answer. Only one can be correct.

 

[bbyrd009]

"The number sequence depends on fixed values and rigid rules..." (hmm, sound familiar? lol)
"but the universe depends on freedom and sovereignty."
Fourier's harmonic analysis, Ulam and a Numerical Quilt

 

[bbyrd009]

Lets not conflate sources of uncertainty into one unified explanation.

author deals with this too, the whole shebang here started with an explanation of why a Unified Field Theory (statement of absolute truth) is not possible in our universe today, yes

 

[bbyrd009]

"...Much like it would take infinite power to become almighty, or infinite knowledge to become omniscient, the number sequence tries to reach the freedom on which the universe is based by being infinitely large. The universe maintains freedom by not predicting what comes next. The number sequence tries to imitate that by summing up the infinite amount of outcomes. Creation allows finite variety and achieves freedom; the number sequence sums up infinite variety but in stead of achieving freedom, it achieves infinity. Or rather, does not achieve freedom.

The number sequence needs perpetual maintenance, perpetual additions in the form of prime numbers to maintain the continuity it depends on. The universe works in quite the opposite fashion. Everything that has ever existed, or will ever exist, was already there it that awesome event some call The Beginning and others The Big Bang. And any system that requires a) infinity and b) constant input of new pulses can not represent the universe. And if you think that description fits solely the number sequence you are in for a rather grim surprise..." ibid
cue @ScottA

 

[bbyrd009]

"In 1931 a grim and paranoid genius named Kurt Gödel — the Martin Luther of mathematics — discovered another reason why mathematics can not be the language in which the whole Truth may one day be expressed.

Probably as poorly understood and often misapplied as Luther, Kurt Gödel made himself odious by mathematically proving that a system founded on axioms — which are your basic assumptions upon which you build your understanding or theory or religion, etc — can never hope to find proof for the consistency of those initial axioms, and will therefore always be incomplete.

This is called Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem and this theorem caused a Reformation in logic philosophy. Just like Luther proved that salvation comes through faith and not works, Gödel proved that the whole Truth can only be believed and not proven.

What a bummer for all those hopeful believers who believed that one day, somehow, either Math or their philosophy, or their religion would lead them out of the bondage of ignorance. No way, Jose...

Since Gödel we know that a logical system can not liberate. But that doesn't mean that rules are bad. Rules help create order and understanding. A society based on rules is far better off than a society not based on rules. And Math put a man on the moon. Math gave us the Internet. Math gave us this whole wild global culture. Yea, Math may run with the wind and the free range chickens as long as not the whole Truth is addressed. A system of logic can not cover Truth; Truth can not be expressed in logic. The Grand Unified Theory (GUT, or GUTH as a certain somebody demands) will not be written in Math. This is also the reason why you never hear anyone solemnly swear to tell the Truth, the whole Truth and nothing but the Truth, so help me Mathematics."
Kurt Gödel and his Incompleteness Theorem

@aspen

 

[bbyrd009]

"Bottom line: No logical system will ever be done forming and can never cover everything and can never represent Truth.

Hold that thought (9)
No logical system will ever be able to fully present the Truth about the Universe.

The most obvious Biblical application of this principle is of course the building of the Tower of Babel, in Gen..."
ibid

 

[bbyrd009]

If you ask a physicist to explain the double slit experiment they will come up with quantum string theory

that is treated at the bottom of the latest link page

 

[bbyrd009]

The Most Deceitful Thing; Truth and Patterns

 

[aspen]

I wonder if the first 175 digits of pi could be added up to 777. I heard a detective once say, “Numbers, when tortured enough, will confess to anything.” :)

Shh...

We dont need another inquisition....

 

[bbyrd009]

Lets not conflate sources of uncertainty into one unified explanation.

If you ask a physicist to explain the double slit experiment they will come up with quantum string theory. But ask @ScottA and he will have a better answer. Only one can be correct.

@ScottA , i'd like to hear it! btw

 

[bbyrd009]

Shh...

We dont need another inquisition....

ha ok, but note my answer to that post, or the author's or whatever. Inquisition is kind of the point here iow, an inquisition into how we accept false truth, perhaps. If you see any holes, bam poke them

 

[bbyrd009]

"...Our beliefs are not valid instruments to analyze either reality in general or any specific pattern...
Truth can only be noticed when the private perspective is doubted..."
ibid post 28

 

[bbyrd009]

Various religions and philosophies stated long before Einstein that reality exists only between two or more observers
(see Matthew 18:20) A Stroll down the Slippery Slope

ha. never extrapolated the connection to witnesses in that passage, myself, duh. You?
amazing what one can have right in front of them and not see, huh

 

[lforrest]

@ScottA , i'd like to hear it! btw

Lord willing, so would I.

 

[ScottA]

"...Much like it would take infinite power to become almighty, or infinite knowledge to become omniscient, the number sequence tries to reach the freedom on which the universe is based by being infinitely large. The universe maintains freedom by not predicting what comes next. The number sequence tries to imitate that by summing up the infinite amount of outcomes. Creation allows finite variety and achieves freedom; the number sequence sums up infinite variety but in stead of achieving freedom, it achieves infinity. Or rather, does not achieve freedom.

The number sequence needs perpetual maintenance, perpetual additions in the form of prime numbers to maintain the continuity it depends on. The universe works in quite the opposite fashion. Everything that has ever existed, or will ever exist, was already there it that awesome event some call The Beginning and others The Big Bang. And any system that requires a) infinity and b) constant input of new pulses can not represent the universe. And if you think that description fits solely the number sequence you are in for a rather grim surprise..." ibid
cue @ScottA

I am under the weather so I have not read every post.

But I will tell you, this prospect of discovering the secrets of the universe, is like examining a dream. The medical scientist would look at the brain, the psychologist would look into the mind, and the psychiatrist would look into the life of the individual. Not even many theologians would look at it any different.

So, if your studies produce a form of numeric jello...it is because you are trying to put a fix on what you have not yet defined. Actually, it's worse than that.

But if I tell you the truth...will you not simply go back to your 'isms?

 

[bbyrd009]

So, if your studies produce a form of numeric jello...it is because you are trying to put a fix on what you have not yet defined. Actually, it's worse than that.

the author makes the same point, yes

But if I tell you the truth...will you not simply go back to your 'isms?

if even one person who needs it in 5 years and finds it in search is convicted by it, does it matter?

 

[bbyrd009]

"The Household Set: atom, cell and mind are self-similar"
The Household Set: atom, cell and mind are self-similar

 

[bbyrd009]

Next: For Whom the Bell Curve Tolls →
lol

 

[bbyrd009]

"According to the Household Set, the global nucleus is already around. We should be able to somehow find traces of the existence of a possible global consensus. And we've already established that this consensus, or Truth, should not be an expression or excursion in numbers or any other system of axioms or logic, nor should it be biased towards a specific cultural perspective.

Truth should cover everything and for everyone in an acceptable manner. It should be pleasing and liberating and address everyone's most intimate selves and guide us all towards a splendid union; a new life all together. But there's more. Truth should not describe the universe and all its contents, because that would require some kind of media in which Truth is expressed, which can therefore not be part of it. And Truth can not be displayed by anything that isn't Truth itself. Truth therefore should be some kind of presentation that works like the universe, the universe's principles clearly embedded in the presentation like they are within every atom and all structures formed by them. Truth - by far the most unusual entity in the universe - should be mental since it will serve as core to a mental realm, and it should be connected to a code of some sort, just like the mind of man is connected to the human genome.

The most obvious answer is that the nucleic Truth that will be seated in Household level 4 is Jesus Christ. The 'code' connected to Him, which summarizes Him the very way we are summarized in our genome, is the Bible (or more precise: is reflected by the Bible). We have proof of this. Proof will be submitted in the chapters to come.

Why is this so very important that we would waste tons of bites and your valuable time? The answer is as grim as it is simple. If we can translate the Gospel in the language the world speaks (Math; science) and show the world where we (as a species) will evolve to, and that the 'missing' nucleus isn't missing at all, we will find peace as a species and we won't have to bomb each other's countries anymore. Most of us will find that worth investigating. So let's."

— This concludes our Introduction to Chaos Theory —

Go to the next chapter:
An introduction to Scripture Theory →

 

[ScottA]

if even one person who needs it in 5 years and finds it in search is convicted by it, does it matter?

That is why I am not silent.