But that is not what is called for in Daniel 9. That is a mystical interpretation.
When Jesus quoted Daniel 9 He used the future tense meaning it was something to happen and He told His followers that when it happened they were to do several things- one being flee! They did not as they did in 66 AD and also when the antichrist enters the rebuilt temple as described in Thesselonians.
Yes indeed, Jesus did point to the "
AoD" to be in the future,.....
His immediate future:
John 2
[
19] Jesus answered and said unto them,
Destroy [desolate] this temple [of Himself], and in three days I will
raise it up [
Restore it].
[
20] Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days?
[
21]
But he spake of the temple of his body.
[
22]
When therefore he was risen from the dead, his disciples remembered that he had said this unto them; and they believed the scripture, and the word which Jesus had said.
No one here seems to correctly understand
the 2300 day prophecy of Daniel 12.
Within that prophecy there were 1290 days (not years), whereby
king Antiochus Epiphanes lV ransacked and
desolated [
destroyed] the temple/sanctuary in Jerusalem. However,
45 days later** the prince of Israel,
Judas Maccabeus,
restored [
raised up] the temple/sanctuary back to use for God and Israel.
Today the Jews celebrate that historical event as Hanukkah.
Please read and digest 1&2 Maccabees, for that Jewish historical account.
** Note: "
blessed is he that
waiteth, and
cometh to the 1335 days. Dan. 12
[
11] And from the time that the daily sacrifice shall be taken away, and
the abomination that maketh desolate set up, there shall be a thousand two hundred and ninety [1290] days.
[
12]
Blessed is he that
waiteth, and
cometh to the thousand three hundred and five and thirty [1335] days, which is 45 days later,
AFTER the
restoration of the temple ].
Now you can know how Jesus applied the "
AoD" of Dan.
in typology to Himself,
including the blessing that he told the disciples to
"wait for" in Jerusalem, from His Father from on high".
What was that blessing from God the Father, of which one disciple didn't wait for it, nor COULD he come to it, because he committed suicide, before the Gift of God was made available to all people?
Typology has become much abused in these days of myriadas of mystical reinterpreters who all claim Holy Spirit Inspiration yet disagree with each other!
Not mystical, but rather
spiritual:
1 Cor. 2
[
13] Which things also we speak,
not in the words which
man's wisdom teacheth, but which
the Holy Ghost teacheth;
comparing spiritual things with spiritual.
[
14] But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are
spiritually discerned.
[
15]
But he that is spiritual judgeth all things, yet he himself is judged of no man.
So are you saying Jesus had a proud look a lying tongue and hands that shedded innocent blood because you declare only the Father is good(though the Scripture says only God which Jesus is)
Wrong choice from Proverbs 6:17.
The word you were to be looking for, about the
status of Jesus character, before God, is that He was neither evil nor good! He was
INNOCENT.
It is what God
interjected as being
the 7th abomination, to that of the six other abominations.
The answer is:
Proverbs 6[
16] These six things doth the LORD hate:
yea,
seven are an
abomination unto him:
[
17] A proud look, a lying tongue, and
HANDS THAT SHED innocent blood,...
Edit:
So then, the real number one question is,
WHOSE HANDS shed the innocent blood of Jesus? Be aware and forewarned!! You will not like, agree or want to accept the truthful answer in the two following accounts.......it was the
Jews that shed the innocent blood of their Messiah/Savior Jesus,
which indeed was an abomination against God.
Mark 15
[
12] And Pilate answered and said again unto them, What will ye then that I shall do unto him whom ye call the King of the Jews?
[
13] And they cried out again,
Crucify him.
[
14] Then Pilate said unto them, Why, what evil hath he done? And they cried out the more exceedingly,
Crucify him.
If that wasn't bad enough,
the Jews then invited God's wrath upon themselves and their children:
Mat. 27
[
22] Pilate saith unto them, What shall I do then with Jesus which is called Christ?
They all say unto him, Let him be crucified.
[
23] And the governor said, Why, what evil hath he done?
But they cried out the more, saying, Let him be crucified.
[
24] When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but that rather a tumult was made,
he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, I am innocent of the blood of this just person: see ye to it.
[
25]
Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children.
Yes and all those who disagree with you have said the same as you. I call it the trickery of reading between the lines of which we know there is nothing there.
The "
natural man" can never be the judge in "comparing spiritual things with spiritual"