Daniels 70-Weeks Timeline

[EclipseEventSigns]

If you don't consider grammar important, just leave it for those who do.

Wow. Just wow. It's amazing the mocking and ridicule and twisting and misrepresentation that you do. Just flabbergasted that you can't even bother to do any kind of biblical research and then come up with these wildly childish statements.

 

[covenantee]

Wow. Just wow. It's amazing the mocking and ridicule and twisting and misrepresentation that you do. Just flabbergasted that you can't even bother to do any kind of biblical research and then come up with these wildly childish statements.

Grammar doesn't mock, ridicule, twist, or misrepresent.

It just declares.

 

[David in NJ]

Not at all. It's part of the Ezra 6:14 Challenge - for you and others to address.

i haven't looked at Ezra 6:14

i am looking at Daniel chapter 9

 

[EclipseEventSigns]

i haven't looked at Ezra 6:14

i am looking at Daniel chapter 9

If your interpretation of Daniel 9 does not take into account the entirety of Scripture, it is not correct. It must address Ezra 6:14
[Ezr 6:14 LSB] 14 And the elders of the Jews were building and succeeding through the prophesying of Haggai the prophet and Zechariah the son of Iddo. So they built and completed [it] according to the decree of the God of Israel and the decree of Cyrus, Darius, and Artaxerxes king of Persia.

And it must address the 7 other facts that no one wants to even look at which invalidates every interpretation - except for the one correct one. Just these 8 facts alone destroys every single interpretation presented in this thread.
8 Points of the Ezra 6:14 Challenge

 

[Jay Ross]

Wow. Just wow. It's amazing the mocking and ridicule and twisting and misrepresentation that you do. Just flabbergasted that you can't even bother to do any kind of biblical research and then come up with these wildly childish statements.

Said the Pot calling the kettle black.

Many threads have been locked with less vitriol.

 

[David in NJ]

If your interpretation of Daniel 9 does not take into account the entirety of Scripture, it is not correct. It must address Ezra 6:14
[Ezr 6:14 LSB] 14 And the elders of the Jews were building and succeeding through the prophesying of Haggai the prophet and Zechariah the son of Iddo. So they built and completed [it] according to the decree of the God of Israel and the decree of Cyrus, Darius, and Artaxerxes king of Persia.

And it must address the 7 other facts that no one wants to even look at which invalidates every interpretation - except for the one correct one. Just these 8 facts alone destroys every single interpretation presented in this thread.
8 Points of the Ezra 6:14 Challenge

You said: "If your interpretation of Daniel 9 does not take into account the entirety of Scripture, it is not correct."

YES and Nope

Did the WORD become flesh and dwell among us, then gave Himself to be "cut-off" on the Cross for Iniquity/Transgression/Sin = YES

Did God make the Declaration that this would occur thru the Prophet Daniel (ch9) = YES

Must we need to know the exact timing of these God Ordained Events? = Nope

Now i am in agreement with you on the 'precise/exact' meaning of Scripture and yet the Emphasis is on CHRIST = Collossians 2:16

"So let no one judge you in food or in drink, or regarding a festival or a new moon or sabbaths, which are a shadow of things to come, but the substance is of Christ."

With regards to Daniel ch9 the REAL ISSUE of exactness is what Week Messiah was "cut-off" = 69th or 70th

That decision changes how we accept/conclude Matthew ch24

 

[covenantee]

If your interpretation of Daniel 9 does not take into account the entirety of Scripture, it is not correct. It must address Ezra 6:14
[Ezr 6:14 LSB] 14 And the elders of the Jews were building and succeeding through the prophesying of Haggai the prophet and Zechariah the son of Iddo. So they built and completed [it] according to the decree of the God of Israel and the decree of Cyrus, Darius, and Artaxerxes king of Persia.

And it must address the 7 other facts that no one wants to even look at which invalidates every interpretation - except for the one correct one. Just these 8 facts alone destroys every single interpretation presented in this thread.
8 Points of the Ezra 6:14 Challenge

Your "interpretation" cannot even pass the basic grammar test, which is the starting point for all interpretation.

You've crashed before you get off the ground.

 

[EclipseEventSigns]

Your "interpretation" cannot even pass the basic grammar test, which is the starting point for all interpretation.

You've crashed before you get off the ground.

Let's see you address the 8 points of the Ezra 6:14 Challenge first. They are FACTS. Deal with the facts and how does your interpretation fit with the FACTS. But are you going to continue to resort to mocking, ridiculing, deflection, red herrings and ad hominems showing that you got nothing to offer.

 

[EclipseEventSigns]

You said: "If your interpretation of Daniel 9 does not take into account the entirety of Scripture, it is not correct."

YES and Nope

Did the WORD become flesh and dwell among us, then gave Himself to be "cut-off" on the Cross for Iniquity/Transgression/Sin = YES

Did God make the Declaration that this would occur thru the Prophet Daniel (ch9) = YES

Must we need to know the exact timing of these God Ordained Events? = Nope

Now i am in agreement with you on the 'precise/exact' meaning of Scripture and yet the Emphasis is on CHRIST = Collossians 2:16

"So let no one judge you in food or in drink, or regarding a festival or a new moon or sabbaths, which are a shadow of things to come, but the substance is of Christ."

With regards to Daniel ch9 the REAL ISSUE of exactness is what Week Messiah was "cut-off" = 69th or 70th

That decision changes how we accept/conclude Matthew ch24

Let's see you address the 8 points of the Ezra 6:14 Challenge.

And btw, you are taking Col 2:16 totally out of context. Paul is talking about the Judaizers who wanted to keep the Christians shackled to the Law of Moses. You are not even close to applying this verse correctly.

 

[David in NJ]

Let's see you address the 8 points of the Ezra 6:14 Challenge.

And btw, you are taking Col 2:16 totally out of context. Paul is talking about the Judaizers who wanted to keep the Christians shackled to the Law of Moses. You are not even close to applying this verse correctly.

BTW - Col 2:16 is the awareness that the OT speaks of CHRIST and CHRIST fulfills the Law on our behalf.

The application to your Ezra challenge is the same = CHRIST is the 70th Week = Beginning and End

 

[EclipseEventSigns]

In all of these many pages of discussion no one has yet brought up the passage in Isaiah which is also tied to Gabriel's answer of the 70 Weeks Prophecy. Most people have never truly understood the connection with Isaiah 42. And especially Is 42:6 - confirming the covenant that God made.

 

[covenantee]

In all of these many pages of discussion no one has yet brought up the passage in Isaiah which is also tied to Gabriel's answer of the 70 Weeks Prophecy. Most people have never truly understood the connection with Isaiah 42. And especially Is 42:6 - confirming the covenant that God made.

So enlighten us from your repository of truth.

 

[David in NJ]

i

In all of these many pages of discussion no one has yet brought up the passage in Isaiah which is also tied to Gabriel's answer of the 70 Weeks Prophecy. Most people have never truly understood the connection with Isaiah 42. And especially Is 42:6 - confirming the covenant that God made.

i have not compared the scriptures, as yet, to join in on the challenge