Wrangler
Well-Known Member
However, from the standpoint of those women who do not submit, most of the time it is a trust issue.
Mostly, it is an ego issue. Who do these women, not trust; God, the man they chose or themselves?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
However, from the standpoint of those women who do not submit, most of the time it is a trust issue.
Which ego? The man's or woman's?Mostly, it is an ego issue. Who do these women, not trust; God, the man they chose or themselves?
Which ego? The man's or woman's?
To put it simply, if you follow Scripture, yes.
Wives are to submit to husbands.
Women are not to have authority over men in the church.
Women are to remain quiet in the church (yes that means women pastors is wholly against Scripture).
OR, a third option, you completely misinterpret the passage. Notice the woman speaking in 1 Corinthians is a disgrace. It's not celebrated, not encouraged. As far as Romans 16, how does that change anything at all with regard to this topic? It doesn't.Well... Lets' see...
What concerns me more than scribal additions is the biblical text altered by men like you in the past... Men that are insecure with their manhood!
Rom 16:7 Greet Andronicus and Junia, my compatriots and my fellow prisoners. They are well known to the apostles, and they were in Christ before me.
Changes made by our Bible translators. Changing a woman’s name “Junia” to a man’s name is unacceptable. Other translators who keep the woman’s name but change her relationship to the apostles is also unacceptable.. It raises integrity questions. I have also discovered that our Bible
dictionaries and concordance have been possibly contaminated by theologians due to either lazy scholarship or an out right attempt to alter the definition. It appears that scholars of some of these reference books only ask theologians for the definition or seek the incorrect information to match their theological view. Since there is no know record of a male name of Junias, and all textual scholars and manuscripts agree that the name is Junia, why are some Bibles and Bible dictionaries and concordance changing the true meaning?
King James with strong numbers
Salute782 Andronicus408 and2532 Junia,2458
( Note: the same Strong number but different name?)
NASB with strong numbers
Greet782 Andronicus408 and Junias2458
G2458
Thayer Definition:
Junia = “youthful”
1) a Christian woman at Rome, mentioned by Paul as one of his kinsfolk and fellow prisoners
Part of Speech: noun proper feminine . (Notice no mention of apostleship )
A Related Word by Thayer’s/Strong’s Number: of Latin origin
Strong’s Definition:
Of Latin origin; Junias, a Christian: - Junias. (Notice no mention of gender or apostleship and wrong name)
Word Study Definition: (Notice no mention of apostleship and wrong name)
Iounías; gen. Iounía, fem. Junias, a kinsman and fellow prisoner of Paul
Easton Bible Dictionary: (Notice no mention of gender or apostleship)
Junia
(Rom_16:7), a Christian at Rome to whom Paul sends salutations along with Andronicus.
Faussett Bible Dictionary: (Notice no mention of gender)
Junia
A Christian at Rome, one of Paul's "kinsmen ("fellow countrymen", Rom_9:3) and fellow prisoners who are of note among the apostles, who also were in Christ before him" (Rom_16:7).
Perhaps.... you should search how Paul taught .....
1Co 11:4 Any man who prays or prophesies with his head covered disgraces his head. But any woman who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered disgraces her head, for it is one and the same thing as having a shaved head.
This was done in Public and out Loud in Church!
1Co 14:34 the women should be silent in the churches, for they are not permitted to speak. Rather, let them be in submission, as in fact the law says. If they want to find out about something, they should ask their husbands at home, because it is disgraceful for a woman to speak in church.
So... either Paul completely contradicted His own teaching 3 chapters earlier.... or men like you added to scripture... Want to guess what the scholars found.... LOL Yep... 1Co 11:4 is all over the manuscript map...
Shown to be added by men not unlike yourself... Men unable to deal with strong women and want to shup them up.... Yet Jesus speaks through His body... and his body is full of Women!!! Did Paul not write again... Gal 3:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free man, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus.
When I was in Tennessee we had names for men like you... but only women had them.... God works in mysterious ways!
Paul
Actually it does. It says wives submit, full stop. It doesn't qualify that, doesn't give caveats. It says wives submit.Neither does it say that women are to submit to their husband's if the husband isn't doing what he's supposed to do.
OR, a third option, you completely misinterpret the passage. Notice the woman speaking in 1 Corinthians is a disgrace. It's not celebrated, not encouraged. As far as Romans 16, how does that change anything at all with regard to this topic? It doesn't.
Putting down? I have not put down women. That is a gross misrepresentation of ANYTHING I have said in this thread. Nor do I say women are to shut up. You obviously have not read this whole thread.Perhaps you reformed1689 could actually do some research instead of putting down and trying to shut up the other half of the body of Christ
I believe Peter and Paul believed this. At some point one might ask, "Did Peter and Paul always write down exactly what God told them to write down?"To put it simply, if you follow Scripture, yes.
Wives are to submit to husbands.
Women are not to have authority over men in the church.
Women are to remain quiet in the church (yes that means women pastors is wholly against Scripture).
I believe Peter and Paul believed this. At some point one might ask, "Did Peter and Paul always write down exactly what God told them to write down?"
People would have to get their information straight from the Lord.Guess what would happen if they did not??!!
Are you saying that God is NOT the Author of the Bible and that the contents of Scripture is NOT talking straight directly to you?People would have to get their information straight from the Lord.
Paul told us to pray constantly (1 Thessalonians 5:17). When you pray, do you listen to God or do you just talk?Are you saying that God is NOT the Author of the Bible and that the contents of Scripture is NOT talking straight directly to you?
No wonder you're having problems understanding. the things of God.
Paul told us to pray constantly (1 Thessalonians 5:17). When you pray, do you listen to God or do you just talk?
I believe you objected to my question: "Did Peter and Paul always write down exactly what God told them to write down?" If we are constantly praying, and listening to what God tells us, why would it matter if Peter and Paul always wrote down exactly what God told them to write down?For a surety, you don't read posts very well, do you?. What has 1 Thessalonians 5:17 have to do with our discussion at hand?
So you want to question Scripture? If that is the case Bob, what parts of Scripture are right? What parts are not? No, I'm not going down that path. We don't just get to ignore the parts of Scripture we do not like.I believe Peter and Paul believed this. At some point one might ask, "Did Peter and Paul always write down exactly what God told them to write down?"
We know God and Jesus are always right, so if you see God or Jesus quoted, you know you must obey.So you want to question Scripture? If that is the case Bob, what parts of Scripture are right? What parts are not? No, I'm not going down that path. We don't just get to ignore the parts of Scripture we do not like.
How do you know they were quoted accurately? You have a problem with the Bible. I get it. But guess what ALL Scripture is inspired. Not just the Red letters or the quotes of God.We know God and Jesus are always right, so if you see God or Jesus quoted, you know you must obey.
I know they were quoted accurately because I know the Bible doesn't lie.How do you know they were quoted accurately? You have a problem with the Bible. I get it. But guess what ALL Scripture is inspired. Not just the Red letters or the quotes of God.