ROFL You've just made the opposite point.
ONEPWX. ?
Stranger
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
ROFL You've just made the opposite point.
"Under the law" means under its condemnation. No one in Messiah Yeshua comes under condemnation or a curse. I don't know why you would say such a thing except to scare people into not keeping the Sabbath Day holy. Sabbath keepers are NOT under the law any more than Sunday keepers who do not steal or commit adultery. You can't seem to believe that the Sabbath can be obeyed out of love for our Father without seeking to be justified or saved by it.
ah no, the reply was "look at what you have done" or something? Iow the Q was not even pertinent, it was an obvious deflection, "no, you are your brother's murderer" maybe.Is the reply "no"? If so, why?
The context surrounding verse 10 is justification by faith vs. justification by law. If I was seeking to be justified by my Sabbath keeping, I would be cursed. However, I am justified by my faith in Messiah Yeshua. My works are simply a fruit of my faith and without works my faith would be dead.(Gal. 3:10) "For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse:..."
Stranger
No, I can't make him hear, but I can't give up planting seeds that may someday bear fruit. He has a choice to no longer hear. Then its all on him (whoever "he" is).So i dunno about "no" either, and i don't mean to disagree with your reasoning there, as there is surely a sense in which we are our brother's "keeper" also; but as far as your responsibility to your brother's keeping Sabbath, imo it should not be a problem for you if he does not, and you have already "kept" your brother there when you repeat the words of the prophets on the matter imo. I don't think you can be required to make him hear them either, right? :)
I'm not sure what "nation" you are referring to. The Christian nation? No need to leave it since I was kicked out of it for obeying the commandments.Or you might outline your next steps to address this problem, since we're just spitballing now, and the point might become clearer. You can dissociate from their nation w/o parting as enemies or even "with a problem" iow, at least i think. It is bc they are associated as being in your nation that you have a problem so to speak, right? And of course you do in that sense have a problem, too, no denying it. A man's enemies will be those of his own house, a house divided cannot stand, and all that rot
The cure imo is leave that nation, not expect anyone in that nation to suddenly begin hearing the prophets, and maybe condemning them if they do not or whatever, even shunning them etc.
I'm not sure what "nation" you are referring to. The Christian nation? No need to leave it since I was kicked out of it for obeying the commandments.
You did not supply any verses stating Yeshua is YHWH except Hebrews 8 where you read him into the text.
You did not supply any verses stating Yeshua is YHWH except Hebrews 8
?? Yes, I live in NC. What does that have to do with getting kicked out of Christianity? I didn't say I was kicked out of the USA. Oy vey!Baloney! You live in North Carolina.
Hebrews 8 is not wrong. It is your insertion of "Christ" in places it does not belong that is wrong.Heb 8 - reads as it does -- the only response to it so far is to complain about the text and the fact that I keep noticing how it all fits with Christ as the primary focus all the way through it.
Were we simply "not supposed to notice"?? No one offers "details" to show that the Hebrews 8 text is wrong.
==== in any case since you want "more of that" -- fine.
A clever word substitution ("for" instead of "of") in Isaiah 40:3.Mark 1:2-3
2 As it is written in Isaiah the prophet:
“Behold, I send My messenger ahead of You,
Who will prepare Your way;
3 The voice of one crying in the wilderness,
‘Make ready the way of the Lord,
Make His paths straight.’”
Which is quoting
Isiah 40:3
A voice is calling,
“Clear the way for the Lord (YHWH) in the wilderness;
Make smooth in the desert a highway for our God.
If this passage proves Yeshua is YHWH, then Jeremiah 33:16 teaches that Jerusalem is also YHWH. It reads;And of course all Bible students know this one -
Jeremiah 23:6
“Behold, the days are coming,” declares the Lord,
“When I will raise up for David a righteous Branch;
And He will reign as king and act wisely
And do justice and righteousness in the land.
6 “In His days Judah will be saved,
And Israel will dwell securely;
And this is His name by which He will be called,
‘The Lord (YHWH) our righteousness.’
The context surrounding verse 10 is justification by faith vs. justification by law. If I was seeking to be justified by my Sabbath keeping, I would be cursed. However, I am justified by my faith in Messiah Yeshua. My works are simply a fruit of my faith and without works my faith would be dead.
You just jump from one false accusation to the other. Are you looking for something that sticks so you can justify your own lawlessness? You are still using Galatians 3 to attack me even though the context refers to the Galatians seeking to be justified by law. I'm already "perfect" through Yeshua (Hebrews 10:14).Sounds good. You are justified by faith. Not by law.
(Gal. 3:2-3) "This only would I learn of you,Received ye the Spirit y the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith? Are ye so foolish? having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh?"
Stranger
Hi,The Father's commands are the Ten Commandments. Exodus 20
Jesus' commands are to have faith in Himself, and to love. 1 John 3:23
Galatians 3:19 What purpose then does the law serve? It was added because of transgressions, till the Seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was appointed through angels by the hand of a mediator. 20 Now a mediator does not mediate for one only, but God is one. 21 Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not! For if there had been a law given which could have given life, truly righteousness would have been by the law. 22 But the Scripture has confined all under sin, that the promise by faith in Jesus Christ might be given to those who believe. 23 But before faith came, we were kept under guard by the law, kept for the faith which would afterward be revealed. 24 Therefore the law was our tutor to bring us to Christ, that we might be justified by faith. 25 But after faith has come, we are no longer under a tutor.
We are no longer under a tutor. You may have been taught that the only law this is talking about are sacrifices. No, the righteous requirements of the law have to do with the Ten Commandments. Romans 7 shows this to be true: What shall we say then? Is the law sin? Certainly not! On the contrary, I would not have known sin except through the law. For I would not have known covetousness unless the law had said, “You shall not covet.”
Romans 8:1-4 There is therefore now no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus, who do not walk according to the flesh, but according to the Spirit. 2 For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has made me free from the law of sin and death. 3 For what the law could not do in that it was weak through the flesh, God did by sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, on account of sin: He condemned sin in the flesh, 4 that the righteous requirement of the law might be fulfilled in us who do not walk according to the flesh but according to the Spirit.
Yes, I'm speaking about the second type of eternal security.Ok so there are two forms of OSAS. Many times the free-will group that I identify with will reduce OSAS to one form - but there are two forms of it.
1. Affirms the Bible doctrine on the "perseverance of the saints" - and won't allow OSAS to be claimed unless the person really does persevere-firm-to-the end of their life. So while they "claim" they have OSAS - realistically they have no actual "assurance" until they see they persevered, because if they fail - they will "retro-delete" all past claims to OSAS for a given person prior to that fail.
2. Denies the Bible doctrine on "perseverance" and so embraces a "live-like-the-devil yet saved-anyway" form of gospel.
Your statement is specific to that second flavor of OSAS - which means you will sometimes get complaints from those in the first OSAS group where they say they don't believe in that sort of OSAS as you have identified.
Just FYI.
i guess whoever might offend you by choosing to honor every day the same right, the one you say you would have a problem with?No, I can't make him hear, but I can't give up planting seeds that may someday bear fruit. He has a choice to no longer hear. Then its all on him (whoever "he" is).
doesn't really describe his nation though, his peer group, whatever. We are far and away the most divided country, with the most nations, so "NC" narrows it down to about 10 or so right. Prolly ten diff "Christian" nations in NC, come to think of itBaloney! You live in North Carolina.
You just jump from one false accusation to the other. Are you looking for something that sticks so you can justify your own lawlessness? You are still using Galatians 3 to attack me even though the context refers to the Galatians seeking to be justified by law. I'm already "perfect" through Yeshua (Hebrews 10:14).
You have built this little box you put all Sabbath keepers in. To you we are all justified by law, fallen from grace, frustrating grace, legalistic, without the Spirit, etc. Now you met a man who is doesn't fit in the box and you don't know what to do with me. The same goes for anyone else on this forum who puts Sabbath keepers in their box. The fact is, there are many Sabbath keepers out there who truly love YHWH and who refuse to sin against Him by breaking His laws. We do not justify our sins by pretending the law no longer applies to believers. We use the law lawfully as the Holy Spirit taught us to through Paul and other NT writers.
Great way of explaining this!Jesus kept the Ten Commandments, but His new commandments go far deeper than the surface commandments of Exodus 20. That is how they are different.
Keeping just the Ten Commandments, one could break the commandments of Jesus.
Keeping the commandments of Jesus, one cannot break the Ten Commandments.
Do you see the difference?
How do you know what I can distinguish?Herein is your problem. It is not about obedience to the Law. It is about walking in the Spirit. For some reason you cannot distinguish the two.
Stranger
Of course my motivation is keeping the law.I argue with you because your motivation is keeping the Law. My motivation is walking in the Spirit. We are both after the same things. Your method, motivation, will not work. Because you will always be breaking the Law. My method, which isn't mine but the method laid out by God in the New Testament, will work. Because walking in the Spirit will accomplish those things written in the Law. But I don't do them to be obedient to the Law. For some reason you have a mental or spiritual block against that.
Stranger
How do you know what I can distinguish?
We're just not speaking the same language.
Here:
We are to walk in the spirit and not in the flesh.
This means to walk with God and follow HIS ways instead of walking with the enemy who delights in our following him in the flesh.
When we DO listen to him (not follow him, that's loss of salvation) we confess our sin to God and are forgiven and continue in our walk.
But we ARE required to obey the law...
the law is, for instance, the 10 commandments, it's what Jesus said to do for the least of His brothers, it's what He said to do regarding the heart condition.
Now, @Nancy and @1stCenturyLady lady gave you a like,,,and yet I know for sure that they also believe in following the commandments of God.
So....
What do you think is the difference?
What do you think I don't understand?
Do you think you could break God's laws and live a life of sin and still be saved?
I know you don't...
So speak as if you don't!