JBO
Well-Known Member
Mark Twain's statement, "Faith is believing what you know ain't so", is false. Faith is believing in something or someone you "know" to be true but can't prove to be true.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
@JBOPOINT BEING:
He wasn't omniscient as Jesus the man.
He only knew what the Father was speaking to him moment by moment.
As you know the quote is false, you overlook the point of the quote.Mark Twain's statement, "Faith is believing what you know ain't so", is false. Faith is believing in something or someone you "know" to be true but can't prove to be true.
I didn't really overlook the point of the quote. It is just that there are many who do not think it is false.As you know the quote is false, you overlook the point of the quote.
That's a whole topic right there.
Most Christians don't know where the Bible came from.
When, why and how we got it.
But like so many others, you aren't one to question such things.
That’s believed. A, belief.It is just that there are many who do not think it is false.
Good. I misread you. Thanks.That's an odd thing to say. Why am I not the one to question such things? Doesnt scripture tell us to?
Revelation 1:6
6 And hath made us kings and priests unto God and his Father; to him be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen..../KJV
So we're kings and priests. What do we do now? As Kings and Priests?
Proverbs 25: 2
2 It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter..../KJV
So it seems to say to search out these things? So I'm good.
Colossians 3:2
2 Set your affection on things above, not on things on the earth..../KJV
??? It would seem that it is for me to question these things.
The interesting thing about this passage, to me at least, is the truth or falsity of Jesus' declaration "I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel." Let's assume it's true, and look at what follows from this: If Jesus healed the daughter, he unilaterally amended his mission. If God healed the daughter, God -- who presumably fashioned Jesus' mission in the first place -- amended the mission.@JBO
I realized something this week when discussing Jesus being sent only to the lost sheep of Israel.
He didn't heal the Canaanite woman's child. Wasn't his calling.
God healed the daughter and INFORMED Jesus of it.
He then reported it to her. Jesus did not do that healing, IMHO
Matthew 15:22-28 NIV
A Canaanite woman from that vicinity came to him, crying out,
“Lord, Son of David, have mercy on me!
My daughter is demon-possessed and suffering terribly.”
23 Jesus did not answer a word. So his disciples came to him and urged him,
“Send her away, for she keeps crying out after us.”
24 He answered, “I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel.”
25 The woman came and knelt before him. “Lord, help me!” she said.
26 He replied, “It is not right to take the children’s bread and toss it to the dogs.”
27 “Yes it is, Lord,” she said. “Even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their master’s table.”
28 Then Jesus said to her, “Woman, you have great faith!
Your request is granted.” And her daughter was healed at that moment.
/
I tend to agree with most of what you say there. However, in His response, "your request is granted" was not done "in faith", but rather in absolute knowledge that it would be done.@JBO
I realized something this week when discussing Jesus being sent only to the lost sheep of Israel.
He didn't heal the Canaanite woman's child. Wasn't his calling.
God healed the daughter and INFORMED Jesus of it.
He then reported it to her. Jesus did not do that healing, IMHO
Matthew 15:22-28 NIV
A Canaanite woman from that vicinity came to him, crying out,
“Lord, Son of David, have mercy on me!
My daughter is demon-possessed and suffering terribly.”
23 Jesus did not answer a word. So his disciples came to him and urged him,
“Send her away, for she keeps crying out after us.”
24 He answered, “I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel.”
25 The woman came and knelt before him. “Lord, help me!” she said.
26 He replied, “It is not right to take the children’s bread and toss it to the dogs.”
27 “Yes it is, Lord,” she said. “Even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their master’s table.”
28 Then Jesus said to her, “Woman, you have great faith!
Your request is granted.” And her daughter was healed at that moment.
/
I suspect, but can't prove, that until the events of Acts 10 and 11, the usual thinking even by Peter and the rest was to interpret Jesus' command in Matthew 28 concerning all nations in a context not unlike what existed under the Old Covenant. And that was that a Gentile was first converted to Judaism. Hence the discussion that arose and was recorded in Acts 15. Paul fought against such Judaizers throughout his ministry.The interesting thing about this passage, to me at least, is the truth or falsity of Jesus' declaration "I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel." Let's assume it's true, and look at what follows from this: If Jesus healed the daughter, he unilaterally amended his mission. If God healed the daughter, God -- who presumably fashioned Jesus' mission in the first place -- amended the mission.
If, on the other hand, Jesus' statement was false -- as John's gospel suggests many times (“Behold the Lamb of God which taketh away the sin of the world") ("God so loved the world . . .") -- then there was no amendment of the mission at all, his mission was always to save everyone, Gentiles included.
It seems that Paul knew nothing of a general command by Jesus to reach out to Gentiles, else he would have quoted it (particularly to Peter and James). By the time we get to the end of Matthew's gospel and see the general command to the apostles to preach to all the nations -- a command that makes completely inexplicable the events of Acts 10 and 11 -- we need to wonder whether the Great Commission is accurately quoted, or whether the author of Matthew took a bit of license here. (If Christ’s parting words to his disciples before His ascension instructed them to spread the gospel to the Gentiles, wouldn’t you think they’d remember it? Wouldn’t you think that Peter and the brethren in Jerusalem would have embraced rather than questioned the practice of reaching out to the Gentiles? Why, then, their surprise?)
You COULD NOT POSSIBLY be more wrong. Literally 180 degrees, 112% wrong. I know what happened because it always happens. You saw the word "science" in my post and went directly into "I know who he is" mode. To repeat: YOU COULD NOT BE more wrong. I refer you to two of my blog entries with no expectation that you will actually read them.You sound like me some years ago. I thought exactly how you do here. How can I really believe if I have never seen anything manifest and convince me beyond a shadow of a doubt.
I thought you said you had read my testimony?Question for @O'Darby
Have you had an supernatural events in your life?
The events in my life have had a great impact on my box size.
They helped me to have even greater faith the possibilities,
or should I say "impossibilities"? (re: the LC quote)
That's interesting.
That conclusion I arrived at was that it takes faith to be a believer.
For that to happen, there HAS to be a few loose ends.
If it was conclusive BEYOND any doubt it wouldn't require faith.
He even helps me find a parking spot. - LOL
Yes, cover to cover.
Surprising how many Christian haven;t done that.
But that may be a personality thing. Some really can't.
I think God wired them differently than I.
Their giftings fill in where mine don't.
That's a good observation.
I think the person that approaches their day asking themselves what they can do
for God today doesn't understand that dynamic. Wait for direction!
Thirty years ago my sister gave me a letter from God on my birthday.
I was half accepting and half skeptical at first. Then I sat down and gave it a hard analysis.
My sister couldn't have authored that. It was deeply personal.
One of the things in the letter...
(remember, this was written to me.
I'm not trying to saddle anyone else with this,
even though I think it's good advice)
One of the things in the letter was that He longed to walk with me every day,
but I needed to ask him every day. So, I have made that a habit, when I remember to.
Life can be very distracting at times.
When I did that, like you, I imagined God in the passenger seat.
And we talked.
As you know the quote is false, you overlook the point of the quote.
Good. I misread you. Thanks.
Maybe I misunderstood to what degree you considered yourself a literalist an inerrantist?
Do you see no contradictions in the Bible? Do you know where the Bible came from?
When Jesus prayed scripture, what Bible was he using?
When Jesus quoted scripture to the crowds, what Bible was he using?
Point taken. Still, the Greek word ethnē translated as “nations” in Matt. 28:19 is universally interpreted to include Gentiles―making it a complete reversal of Christ’s earlier instruction to the apostles to reach out only to the Jews (Matt. 10:5-6) and of his prediction that the apostles won’t complete their mission to the Jews before his return (Matt. 10:23).I suspect, but can't prove, that until the events of Acts 10 and 11, the usual thinking even by Peter and the rest was to interpret Jesus' command in Matthew 28 concerning all nations in a context not unlike what existed under the Old Covenant. And that was that a Gentile was first converted to Judaism. Hence the discussion that arose and was recorded in Acts 15. Paul fought against such Judaizers throughout his ministry.
We know that from the very beginning, God's promise to Abraham was not limited to the Jews, no matter what the Jews later thought.
Yes, very interesting.The interesting thing about this passage, to me at least, is the truth or falsity of Jesus' declaration "I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel." Let's assume it's true, and look at what follows from this: If Jesus healed the daughter, he unilaterally amended his mission. If God healed the daughter, God -- who presumably fashioned Jesus' mission in the first place -- amended the mission.
It seems that God had plans for the affect of Jesus' ministry to reach the who world.If, on the other hand, Jesus' statement was false -- as John's gospel suggests many times (“Behold the Lamb of God which taketh away the sin of the world") ("God so loved the world . . .") -- then there was no amendment of the mission at all, his mission was always to save everyone, Gentiles included.
A Bible footnote before the Great Commission in Mark 16 states this:It seems that Paul knew nothing of a general command by Jesus to reach out to Gentiles, else he would have quoted it (particularly to Peter and James). By the time we get to the end of Matthew's gospel and see the general command to the apostles to preach to all the nations -- a command that makes completely inexplicable the events of Acts 10 and 11 -- we need to wonder whether the Great Commission is accurately quoted, or whether the author of Matthew took a bit of license here. (If Christ’s parting words to his disciples before His ascension instructed them to spread the gospel to the Gentiles, wouldn’t you think they’d remember it? Wouldn’t you think that Peter and the brethren in Jerusalem would have embraced rather than questioned the practice of reaching out to the Gentiles? Why, then, their surprise?)
Good post, thanks.I tend to agree with most of what you say there. However, in His response, "your request is granted" was not done "in faith", but rather in absolute knowledge that it would be done.