The "false prophet" is the same one of Rev.13:11-16, the "another beast", a 2nd beast of that Chapter. Rev.16:13-14 also shows that "false prophet" is who will work miracles to deceive...
Rev 19:20
20 And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone.
KJV
That's this same one here...
Rev 13:11-14
11 And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon.
12 And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.
13 And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men,
14 And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.
KJV
The false prophet is the beast - the body of professed Christians who have performed with lying signs and wonders (ie. false gospel, entertainment, etc.)
Revelation 13 points to only 2 "beast" concepts, a 'beast kingdom' (Rev.13:1) that comes up out of the sea of peoples and nations; and then that "another beast" that ascends from the earth (i.e., bottomless pit) a singular entity, the Antichrist, that is coming to work miracles on earth that will deceive the whole world.
Disagree. Show me the chapter and verse of the Holy Bible where God says the "earth" is the bottomless pit. I know Scripture does not teach that. That is speculation on your part.
That "another beast" that works miracles is compared with the "dragon" (Satan). That's Lord Jesus giving us a strong hint as to who that "another beast" will be, i.e., Satan himself on earth working those miracles in plain sight for the end.
Satan works through the body of the false prophet made up of false prophets, false christs, and all professed (unsaved/deceived) Christians. Not a empire, nation, or a single man.
All the fleshy theories by men's doctrines trying to figure out who the coming Antichrist will be is always wrongly assigning him as being a flesh-born man.
Agreed.
They do the same with the "false prophet" which is actually just a ROLE that the Antichrist-dragon will play. Here is why I say this, it's because NO flesh-born man is judged and sentenced to perdition in the future "lake of fire" until God's Great White Throne Judgment of Revelation 20, which ONLY happens a 1,000 years after Jesus has returned and reigned with His elect.
Disagreed.
I know that many people think 1,000 years is in the future and they believe Christ will establish a literal kingdom on this cursed Earth for 1,000 years. The Bible does not teach that. Sorry. Rather, the 1,000 years refer to the whole New Testament period when Christ build his church while the spirit of Satan was kept at bay until the appointed time PRIOR to Second Coming.
As of today, ONLY Satan and his angels have already been judged and sentenced to perish in the "lake of fire".
Okay, time out. Here is the problem with the word, "Angels." They are messengers.
We should not lean to what some churches, seminaries, theologians, ministers, or TribulationSigns say. We should always defer to what the
Bible itself says since it is our ultimate authority. And I'm sorry for being redundant, but the God-inspired word of God has
never said Angel. ...Not once! It always uses the
Hebrew and Greek word for messenger. This seems to be a fact that you and others
choose to ignore so that you can cling to your church mores, conventions, traditions, and customs over undeniable Biblical facts. This is a sectarian religious tradition held over the God-authored tradition of Sola Scriptura.
Matthew 15:2-3
- "Wherefore do thy disciples transgress the tradition of the elders? for they do not wash their hands when they may eat bread.
- And he answering said to them, `Wherefore also do ye transgress the command of God because of your tradition?"
God's word
says messenger, man's tradition postulates that a certain messenger in any particular instance
could be an "angel". But which is the one that is authoritatively authored by God, and which one is a translator's subjective, unobjective, perspective and supposition? We can answer that honestly, or we can pretend that placing the word ANGEL there is not subjective.
In short, the reason that I believe and declare that the God-authored Hebrew and Greek words [
mal'ak] and [
aggelos] mean messenger is
because the Hebrew and Greek words ...mean messenger! Nothing more complicated than that. Why do you think that literal translations of God's word (
e.g., in a Bible like YLT) does not have the word angel in it anywhere? ...could it be because in all of God's inspired word,
there is no literal word meaning angel in it? Or do you think they did that because they deviously wanted to eliminate angels from the Bible? A or B, which is it? From studying my Bible, I see it is because there is no word meaning angel in God's text, only the word meaning messenger.
And we are the messengers of God (
true believers) who are a spiritual army at war with the messengers of Satan within the church, the false prophet/beast (
unbelievers) over control of the church, whose messengers are drawn from the nations of the world (
Revelation 20:3; Revelation 20:8).
Revelation 2:7
- "He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; To him that overcometh will I give to eat of the tree of life, which is in the midst of the paradise of God."
Says unto the angels of the churches... Oops, I mean, the
messengers of the 7 churches! That is who the warning are for! His Church! His messengers!
Not some man-made fantasy of celestial-created beings called "angels". Selah.