That is entirely up to the judge, not me.
But what you said was - up to you.
Aunty Jane: If Jesus resurrects the unrighteous ones why would he do so only to punish them, if they sinned without law?
Why doubt now.
Last edited:
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
That is entirely up to the judge, not me.
Aunty Jane: If Jesus resurrects the unrighteous ones why would he do so only to punish them, if they sinned without law?
R-man? Perhaps you missed it, but I already addressed this here in this thread in a post to you. @Runningman See my reply here--Where did you find that is something JWs believe?
I am not sure myself. That might have been a forum error, or I just referenced the wrong person.
I can't find any JW references that say this.
That's a doctrinal difference.
I'm a Christian, but I believe in Biblical Unitarianism if I were to give it a name.
I was originally told that by PS95 who knows a lot about what they believe. It's also on their website.Where did you find that is something JWs believe?
You must not be looking very hard. You can do a search on their official website and find statements about that very easily.I can't find any JW references that say this.
Do you believe that Jesus is who the Bible says He is, which means He is God (John 1, Col 1:15-17, Phil 2:5-8, etc.) and reigns over all things (Matt 28:18, Eph 1:19-22, Heb 2:8, etc.)?I'm a Christian, but I believe in Biblical Unitarianism if I were to give it a name.
I was originally told that by PS95 who knows a lot about what they believe. It's also on their website.
The following is an excerpt from this page on their official website: https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/1985882?q=Rom+6:7&p=par
4. Why is fallen mankind heavily indebted to God, and why can we not relieve ourselves of this debt?
In the Scriptures, sins are likened to debts. (See Matthew 6:12, 14; 18:21-35; Luke 11:4.) All men are sinners and are, therefore, heavily in debt before God. “The wages sin pays is death.” (Romans 6:23) Since they had been “sold under sin” by their forefather Adam, his descendants could do nothing to relieve themselves of this crushing debt. (Romans 7:14) Death of the debtor alone could wipe it out, “for he who has died has been acquitted from his sin.” (Romans 6:7) No good works done during a sinner’s lifetime could buy back what Adam lost, nor even give him a righteous standing before God.—Psalm 49:7, 9; Romans 3:20.
The following is an excerpt from this page on their site: https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/1974730?q=Rom+6:7&p=par
Will those who are raised to life on earth still be imperfect and afflicted with Adamic sin, since Romans 6:7 says that a person “who has died has been acquitted from his sin”?—U.S.A.
Romans 6:7 reads: “For he who has died has been acquitted from his sin.” A consideration of the context shows that the apostle Paul was discussing spirit-anointed Christians alive at that time. While still alive, they had been baptized into Christ Jesus and received the valid prospect of heavenly life. In order to be anointed with holy spirit and accepted as spiritual sons of God, they had to die to their former course in life as imperfect humans, have their sins forgiven by God and have human perfection imputed to them.
But in making this comment with regard to anointed Christians, Paul was drawing on a natural and actual illustration. In its broad application, it could correctly be said that one who has died has been acquitted from sin.
Death, not the dying process in itself, is the full payment for sin. The Bible says: “The wages sin pays is death.” (Rom. 6:23) This means that when a person has died his sinful record no longer stands against him. And were it not for the sacrifice of Jesus Christ and God’s purpose to resurrect the person, he would never live again. Still, he would remain acquitted from sin, as God would not repeatedly reexamine his case and then sentence him to other kinds of punishment for his sin.
This might be compared to the situation of a man serving a prison term for some criminal act. Once he has served his time of imprisonment, he is not repeatedly retried and punished for the same crime.
Now in the case of one raised from the dead to earthly life, the sinful record for which he was condemned to death no longer stands against him. Like one released from imprisonment, he has the opportunity to conform to law. Nevertheless, the resurrected one is still the same human. His death produced no change in him as to personality and sinful inclinations. By resurrection he did not become a perfect human, free from all effects of sin and imperfection inherited from Adam. He was not declared righteous because of dying. As in the case of an ex-convict, he must put forth diligent effort not to succumb to his fleshly weaknesses. He must start in, as it were, where he left off in life and take full advantage of God’s provisions for everlasting life on earth.
Because of the life they lived before their death, some people will have a stronger leaning toward wrongdoing than others. The Bible does, in fact, say: “There is going to be a resurrection of both the righteous and the unrighteous.” (Acts 24:15) So those who were unrighteous at their death will be unrighteous at their resurrection to earthly life.
So while acquitting one from a record of sin, death produces no change in what one is as a person. Those raised to life on earth are the same individuals that died, descendants of sinner Adam. They are imperfect humans, just as were those raised by Elijah, Elisha, Jesus Christ, Peter and Paul centuries ago. The death and resurrection of individuals in the past did not transform them into perfect persons able to live forever. So with those raised on earth in the New Order, it is only their availing themselves of the sin-atoning provisions of Jesus’ sacrifice that shields them from death.
In the Bible book of Revelation, God’s provision for life, including the sin-atoning arrangement, is portrayed symbolically as a river of water of life. (Rev. 22:1, 2) So it is by ‘drinking’ from this ‘river’ that the resurrected ones are gradually liberated from all sinful tendencies and become perfect humans.
Not until they are perfect humans does Jehovah God view them as having come to life in the fullest sense. It is evidently for this reason that the Bible says of those raised to life on earth that they ‘do not come to life until the end of the thousand years’ of Christ’s Kingdom rule, during which rule the benefits of his atoning sacrifice will be applied to humankind.—Rev. 20:5.
Let us pray in this hour that nothing can divide us, and that God will help us against the Devil! Almighty Lord, bless our fight!'
-- Adolph Hitler to the SA in 1930.
Double error, Hitler knew, but exploited God for his sick political purposes.
Ah, so if others just refer to Him as "God" or "Heavenly Father", you think He doesn't know they're talking to Him?
Ehyeh and Yahweh are the same root word but they're cased differently. The latter is in an imperfect tense, indicating ongoing action. It's something like "I am being" or "I continue being" or "I was and continue to be."God’s Name….an important but overlooked topic….
How many people pray the Lord’s Prayer and say the words “hallowed be thy name” without a single thought as to what Jesus was saying?
What does “hallowed” mean?
It means to treat God’s name with respect and reverence, as the Bible writers did.
What is God’s name in the Bible, and did he intend for his worshippers to use it? Why is it missing from modern day translations?
Is there a difference between a name and a title?
Can we explore these questions?
Going back to Exodus and the liberation of God’s people from slavery in Egypt, Moses was sent by God to facilitate their release.
Exodus 3:13-15…from the Jewish Tanakh….
13 And Moses said to God, "Behold I come to the children of Israel, and I say to them, 'The God of your fathers has sent me to you,' and they say to me, 'What is His name?' what shall I say to them?" יגוַיֹּ֨אמֶר משֶׁ֜ה אֶל־הָֽאֱלֹהִ֗ים הִנֵּ֨ה אָֽנֹכִ֣י בָא֘ אֶל־בְּנֵ֣י יִשְׂרָאֵל֒ וְאָֽמַרְתִּ֣י לָהֶ֔ם אֱלֹהֵ֥י אֲבֽוֹתֵיכֶ֖ם שְׁלָחַ֣נִי אֲלֵיכֶ֑ם וְאָֽמְרוּ־לִ֣י מַה־שְּׁמ֔וֹ מָ֥ה אֹמַ֖ר אֲלֵהֶֽם: 14 God said to Moses, "Ehyeh asher ehyeh (I will be what I will be)," and He said, "So shall you say to the children of Israel, 'Ehyeh (I will be) has sent me to you.'" ידוַיֹּ֤אמֶר אֱלֹהִים֙ אֶל־משֶׁ֔ה אֶֽהְיֶ֖ה אֲשֶׁ֣ר אֶֽהְיֶ֑ה וַיֹּ֗אמֶר כֹּ֤ה תֹאמַר֙ לִבְנֵ֣י יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל אֶֽהְיֶ֖ה שְׁלָחַ֥נִי אֲלֵיכֶֽם: 15 And God said further to Moses, "So shall you say to the children of Israel, 'The Lord God of your forefathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, has sent me to you.' This is My name forever, and this is how I should be mentioned in every generation.” טווַיֹּ֩אמֶר֩ ע֨וֹד אֱלֹהִ֜ים אֶל־משֶׁ֗ה כֹּ֣ה תֹאמַר֘ אֶל־בְּנֵ֣י יִשְׂרָאֵל֒ יְהֹוָ֞ה אֱלֹהֵ֣י אֲבֹֽתֵיכֶ֗ם אֱלֹהֵ֨י אַבְרָהָ֜ם אֱלֹהֵ֥י יִצְחָ֛ק וֵֽאלֹהֵ֥י יַֽעֲקֹ֖ב שְׁלָחַ֣נִי אֲלֵיכֶ֑ם זֶה־שְּׁמִ֣י לְעֹלָ֔ם וְזֶ֥ה זִכְרִ֖י לְדֹ֥ר דֹּֽר:
So God revealed his name, and its meaning to Moses and instructed him to tell the people that their God, (יְהֹוָ֞ה Yahweh) would liberate them from slavery.
Some will be saying right away that this is not correct…the meaning of God’s name is “I Am”….but the Jewish Tanakh translates the Tetragrammaton as “I Will Be What I Will Be”, which is not a statement of his existence, (as the Israelites already knew that their God existed) but it was a statement of his intentions in connection with them….he would “BE” whatever he needed to be, in order to accomplish his will and purpose for them….he had to deal with an obstinate Pharaoh and he needed to force him by various means, to release them. Yahweh had a role for them to play….and that was to produce the promised Messiah, through the lineage of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, in the tribe of Judah. Everything about him was outlined in prophesy.
Yahweh became everything he needed to be in order to accomplish his will….and in the process, he demonstrated, in ways his people had never seen, the reality of his power.
How did the Israelites come to lose God’s name, and how did its meaning get to be twisted?
God sent his last prophet to his wayward people some 300 years before the Messiah arrived in 29CE. That would mean that God had virtually given up on correcting his people because they were serial covenant breakers and he let them go their own way until he sent his son….”a prophet like Moses”, who was not sent to correct them (as they were incorrigible) but to divide off from them a “remnant” who would accept Jesus as “the one” promised in their Scripture. This was prophesied. (Rom 9:27)
Long before Jesus arrived on the scene, the Jews had stopped saying God’s name in their speech, but they had kept it in their Scripture with the four Hebrew consonants “YHWH”. They addressed him audibly as “Adonai” which is a title….meaning ”Lord”. This title was common in Bible times as a mark of respect, with slaves often addressing their masters as “lord”. Sarah addressed Abraham by this title, so it is not another name for “God”. (1 Peter 3:6)
After some time, the pronunciation of the divine name was lost and when Jesus came, he too was addressed as “Lord”.
Why did Jesus call the Pharisees ‘children of the devil’? (John 8:44) Because satan had used them in his scheme to have God’s name eliminated from human speech….not only that, but he had manipulated these religious leaders to twist the Scriptures and to teach the people human traditions instead of scriptural truth. Like their “father the devil” they were liars. (Matt 15:7-9)
So now we have a situation where their Messiah has arrived but in a religious climate that was hostile to any change. The Pharisees had the people performing a sham religion, full of legality and short on truth and mercy….making Jesus’ job very difficult. And yet to whom was Jesus sent?
It was not to those proud intractable religious leaders, but to “the lost sheep of the house of Israel” (Matt 15:24)…..the ones who were”lost” because of the shameful neglect of their shepherds….so what did Jesus do that was reflected in the words of the Lord’s Prayer? He made the “hallowed” name of his Father known to his disciples.
In prayer Jesus said at John 17:25-26…
”O righteous Father, even though the world does not know you, I know you, and these know that you have sent me. I made known to them your name, and I will continue to make it known, that the love with which you have loved me may be in them, and I in them.” (ESV)
So Jesus rectified that problem right away, by making his Father’s name known to his followers…..under the divine name there would be love and unity.
Fast forward to later centuries and what do we find? God’s name is not only missing from human speech again, but it is also absent from his own word….very few English Bible translations contain the divine name at all, so satan has once again accomplished his goal…..only better now that it has been subtracted from scripture altogether.
What human author would tolerate their name being removed from their own work, and substituted with the title “Author”? Their name makes the work theirs….to claim credit for. The name of the author is as important as the name of the book they wrote. The author’s reputation is indicated by his name. People will seek out his writings.
The divine name was used extensively in the OT Hebrew Scriptures (almost 7000 times) but in modern Bibles you can only see where it used to be, by the use of capital letters for the title “LORD”. And in the NT Greek Scriptures even where the Hebrew verses quoted by Jesus and the apostles used the divine name, it is again substituted by the title “Kyrios” again meaning “Lord”.
How did this happen….twice? And why is the divine name still hidden from people who read their Bibles? If Jesus taught us to “hallow” or to “sanctify” God’s name, how do to sanctify a name you never use?
Whose agenda are the Bible translators supporting?
Even the “KJV only” crowd can see the divine name in their translation, but only 4 times out of 7000….the most notable is in Psalm 83:18….but who said that this was OK? Who chose those 4 verses?
Going back to Moses in Exodus 3, we see God’s command that his name was to be maintained in every generation, and yet the Jews disobediently chose to stop saying it.
When Jesus came, he restored the divine name but after his death and the passing away of his apostles, the divine name again disappeared as Christianity was taken over by the “weeds” of Jesus’ parable….in a satanically inspired counterfeit “Christianity”.
If you understand the importance of God’s name, then every effort should be made to restore it to its rightful place…..but I hear people say that “we do not know how to to pronounce it”……but that argument falls flat when we say the name “Jesus”, which is the English translation of the name of God’s son, that most people accept without question, yet the English translation of the Father’s name, “Jehovah” is rejected? They even balk at the transliteration “YAHWEH” (how it may have been pronounced in Hebrew) Make sense of that if you can….but God knows his name in any language.
The importance of God’s name was stressed by Jesus himself, so “hallowed be thy name” is as important today, as it was back then. Who can argue with that?
According to the Jewish Tanakh, God’s name means “I Will Be What I Will Be”…..it isn’t a statement of his existence as the Israelites already knew who their God was….it was a statement of his intentions in connection with them and their spectacular exit from Egypt…..they were going to see him “BE“ or “BECOME” whatever he needed to be to accomplish his purpose.Ehyeh and Yahweh are the same root word but they're cased differently. The latter is in an imperfect tense, indicating ongoing action. It's something like "I am being" or "I continue being" or "I was and continue to be."
Disagree. As I see it, this IS a statement of existence, and a rather powerful one...it isn’t a statement of his existence as the Israelites already knew who their God was….
The Jewish Tanakh disagrees with you. It was not a statement of his existence as the Jews did know their God. They were a completely separated people in Egypt who in time became slaves. Moses birth tells the story and how God rescued this child because he would be used mightily in Israel’s future….a future already mapped out for him.Disagree. As I see it, this IS a statement of existence, and a rather powerful one.
Yes, that is true but the interesting thing about this golden calf that the people insisted on Aaron making for them, was what they called it….not “Hathor”…..but “Yahweh”.The Israelites had forgotten their God. Moses left for a few days and they immediately built an idol to the Egyptian goddess Hathor. This was an era where gods were fairly common and were typically made of stone, wood, or metal. Every city and tribe had their own - they were national emblems more than gods.
If you think that Israel did not know their God by the end of the 10th plague then you are sadly mistaken…..they now knew him in a way they had never known him, previous to their becoming a populous nation.When Moses asked God to identify Himself, God effectively answered, "the one who really exists" and then forbid them from making any sort of icon. This was about differentiation. God was letting them know that the way they had been worshiping other gods was NOT going to cut it here.
Jesus is the name above all names, yes. God gave this title to Jesus so God is not calling his own name that, because he gave that authority to his son.Philippines 2:9,10,11
Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the Earth; and that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.
My question to you, is the name of Jesus, the name above all names and is the name of God, seeing how according to this verse in the Bible, the name of Jesus is above all names?
While I agree that it is essential to need keeping the commandments, both Jews and Gentiles, and in both old and new testaments, never was obedience the way to eternal life. Yes, it was a criteria, but the way was always by faith in the blood of the Lamb. Righteousness, comes by faith. Obedience is the result of faith. Justification and sanctification come by faith.Jesus was an Old Covenant Jew and taught people that the way to enter eternal life was by keeping the commandments, especially those 10 Commandments (Matthew 19:17)
Jane, Your thread here can go 9000000 pages and it will never change the simple fact that Jesus never taught us to use a name, and He never used a name when praying. He taught us to say, Father, and He also prayed using Father, and used Lord.The Jewish Tanakh disagrees with you. It was not a statement of his existence as the Jews did know their God. They were a completely separated people in Egypt who in time became slaves. Moses birth tells the story and how God rescued this child because he would be used mightily in Israel’s future….a future already mapped out for him.
Yes, that is true but the interesting thing about this golden calf that the people insisted on Aaron making for them, was what they called it….not “Hathor”…..but “Yahweh”.
They were holding a “festival to Yahweh” but mimicking the worship of an Egyptian idol.
So doesn’t this drive home the fact that if pagan adoptions are celebrated but they are called by another name, they are still offensive to God?
What does Christendom do with celebrations like Christmas and Easter? Both are pagan to their bootstraps, but because they bear a thin veneer of Christianity, it’s all OK and God doesn’t mind?
What did Paul say about that?
“Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers. For what partnership has righteousness with lawlessness? Or what fellowship has light with darkness? What accord has Christ with Belial? Or what portion does a believer share with an unbeliever? What agreement has the temple of God with idols? For we are the temple of the living God; as God said, “I will make my dwelling among them and walk among them,and I will be their God,and they shall be my people. Therefore go out from their midst,and be separate from them, says the Lord, and touch no unclean thing; then I will welcome you, and I will be a father to you,and you shall be sons and daughters to me, says the Lord Almighty.” (2 Cor 6:14-18 ESV)
Separation was required, not “touching the unclean” thing, if one desired to be a son and daughter of God.
If you think that Israel did not know their God by the end of the 10th plague then you are sadly mistaken…..they now knew him in a way they had never known him, previous to their becoming a populous nation.
Yahweh was “the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob”….but now he was the God of the nation that God promised to Abraham, that would come from his seed.
They didn’t need to know that he existed, but what he would “BE” or “BECOME” to his people.
He would continue to show them….
Are you still misunderstanding who the word of God is? - that the Word who became flesh is Jesus?In accordance with the Son of God has a God, is in the image of God, is a representation of God, has a Savior, but the Father does not have a God, nor is in God's image, nor has a Savior. For He is already the one and only God.
Not a single Israelite had ever heard the name YHVH before Moses told them. Before that they worshiped ELHM, and not just one. Archaeology makes it very clear that to the extent that Israel even existed before the Exodus, they were polytheistic....the Jews did know their God. They were a completely separated people in Egypt who in time became slaves. Moses birth tells the story and how God rescued this child because he would be used mightily in Israel’s future….a future already mapped out for him.
A populous nation? If that's the standard, then there was no Israel prior to Moses.If you think that Israel did not know their God by the end of the 10th plague then you are sadly mistaken…..they now knew him in a way they had never known him, previous to their becoming a populous nation.
Right from the garden of Eden, God has shown us the value of obedience. Adam’s disobedience is what led to sin and death for all his children.While I agree that it is essential to need keeping the commandments, both Jews and Gentiles, and in both old and new testaments, never was obedience the way to eternal life. Yes, it was a criteria, but the way was always by faith in the blood of the Lamb. Righteousness, comes by faith. Obedience is the result of faith. Justification and sanctification come by faith.
“Behold, his soul which is lifted up is not upright in him: but the just shall live by his faith. ”
Habakkuk 2:4 KJV
Archaeology does not always make accurate assumptions.Not a single Israelite had ever heard the name YHVH before Moses told them. Before that they worshiped ELHM, and not just one. Archaeology makes it very clear that to the extent that Israel even existed before the Exodus, they were polytheistic.
I’d call several million people all gathered in one place a populous people….wouldn’t you?A populous nation? If that's the standard, then there was no Israel prior to Moses.
A family of 70 people "went down to Egypt" and more than 2 million came out. That math doesn't even remotely work, given the timeframe. Moses brought a lot of people out of Egypt who weren't Abraham's genetic descendants.
Sad that you should come to such a focus. Shouldn't you ought to be remembering that rather than punishment, you would state, Throughout the history of the nation of Israel, likewise the value of obedience was demonstrated in how God responded to their disobedience.…. always with grace and mercy.Throughout the history of the nation of Israel, likewise the value of obedience was demonstrated in how God responded to their disobedience.….often with severe punishment. (Deut 5:29)
I think that what God wants more than just to be known by a name, is to be understood. In other words, is more important to Him, and vital to us, even salvational, that we fully understand and know not just Who God is, but what He is. What His name actually means, for it is His glory.I think what is sad @Brakelite, is that Yahavah wants his name know but so many people just pass it by.
Deuteronomy 32:3 I will proclaim the name of Yahavah/Yahweh; how glorious is our God!
Isaiah 52:6 Therefore my people shall know my name: therefore they shall know in that day that I am he that doth speak: behold, it is I.