Taken
Well-Known Member
I understand this. Are you saying that it is right for this to happen to people?
Why ask IF I said something I DID NOT SAY?
Not once did I condone Theft.
Yes. They were unruly at times to be sure but other methods besides beating
And? So, you "thought" and you "believed" and you "chose" another method of punishment. So? For others, when an alternative method does not correct the behavior.....corporal punishment is an option.
Surely you must comprehend "beat" is subjective...eh?
A whack on the hand a couple of times with a ruler could be considered beating, teaching little children to keep their hands off others possessions, when WORDS were not enough to convince them to keep THEIR hands to THEMSLEVES.
And so also could a 2x4 across the back be considered a beating.
I did not mean they thought for themselves since they were born. Come on you know I did not mean that.
That's the point. Say what you mean, and mean what you say.
They are taught how to think for themselves,
I am not against Teaching a kid to Think for themselves.
However I would Find your Influence of Disbelief, highly doubtful, it is you who encourages them to read and study the knowlege in Scripture.
they still have rules to follow but explaining why there are rules to them allows them to think for themselves and to think of others, how their actions affects others. Beating a child may get them to obey at the moment but that won't last into adulthood. Explaining to them why they are being punished and why there are rules will let them contemplate and think about things in a way that beating them won't.
Well, good to know, YOU thought, YOU decided, YOU chose, according to what rules YOU would raise your children.
And BTW, notifying a child OF the rules, and the Consequences for Violating the Rules, IS taught in Scripture, by Gods Own Example.
He sets the rules, and every obedience TO the Rule, Has a consequence of favor and every disobedience TO the Rule has a consequence of punishment.
The Favor Increases as the child matures and exhibits obedience.
The Punishment Increases as the child matures and exhibits disobedience.
Why do you not read what I actually say? I never said we don't have rules or consequences I said beating them is not a consequence we think is moral. That's all.
But nothing says it is about MORALITY, but rather that is your Opinion.
It has nothing to do with MORALITY.
It has to do with one subjecting themselves WILLINGLY to Authority or NOT.
Either the Parent IS the Authority in "HIS" own Household, or he Isn't.
Glory to God,
Taken