mailmandan
Well-Known Member
When did these Gentiles receive the Holy Spirit in Acts 10:43-47? Before or after baptism?Receiving the Holy Spirit...
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
When did these Gentiles receive the Holy Spirit in Acts 10:43-47? Before or after baptism?Receiving the Holy Spirit...
Your reading a flawed inglish translationWrong...
37 Now when they heard this, they were pricked in their heart, and said unto Peter and to the rest of the apostles, Men and brethren, what shall we do?
38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
....in order to obtain the remission of sins.
Baptism is a burial.
You, Dan the mailman, bury folks alive.
When did these Gentiles receive the Holy Spirit in Acts 10:43-47? Before or after baptism?
WrongIf faith alone could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus
Actually peter is telling them to,repent, and on account of being redeemed based on your repentance, be baptized,That's an interesting verse from Acts... I've never recalled it... Peter is telling them to repent, be baptized and receive the Holy Spirit
The promise is for you and your children and for all who are far off—for all whom the Lord our God will call.”
It supports the view that we don't need to do anything to be saved...
Wrong
Yes, in language, the gift of the spirit points only to repenting, not to baptism, they are different types of words.Receiving the Holy Spirit...
Well the title of this thread does sort of make senseThen its just as wrong as the title of this thread... LoL...![]()
Here is how I look at it, which I believe is taught in the New Testament.If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.
Exactly right. Believed, received the Holy Spirit, saved, then water baptism followed.In that passage the gentiles first received the Holy Spirit then got baptized... Why?
Well the title of this thread does sort of make sense
but faith without the shed blood, that does not make any sense, What would your faith be in?
One thing i do believe is that we get saved after we die...
What is the supporting scripture for the belief that we are saved before we die?
That’s a mistake?“Receiving the end of your faith, even the salvation of your souls”
Many believe that their souls are saved at the beginning of their faith; an error indeed.
if it is we all need to live there n fear because nothing is gauranteed
John preached remission of sins, but spoke of the lamb to provide remission of sins.
False. In Acts 2:38, "for the remission of sins" does not refer back to both clauses, "you all repent" and "each one of you be baptized," but refers only to the first. Peter is saying "repent unto the remission of your sins," the same as in Acts 3:19. The clause "each one of you be baptized" is parenthetical. This is exactly what Acts 3:19 teaches except that Peter omits the parenthesis.
John clearly said "baptism of repentance for the remission of sins." (Mark 1:4; Luke 3:3) Peter said "Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins.." So you are saying that "for the remission of sins" only saves when you attach "in the name of Jesus Christ" to it? Whatever baptism is "for" in Mark 1:4; Luke 3:3 it's also for in Acts 2:38. In both cases baptism is “in regards to/on the basis of” the remission of sins received upon repentance and not in order to obtain the remission of sins. In Matthew 3:11, they were baptized with water for (in regards to/on the basis of) repentance and not in order to obtain repentance. You doctrine is inconsistent.
The reason why these disciples of John were re-baptized after Pentecost was because when Paul asked them in verse 2 if they had received the Holy Spirit when they believed, their answer in verse 3 reveals that they were not yet believers. They had received the baptism of John but did not realize that Jesus Christ was the One to whom John's baptism pointed. Paul gave them instructions about Jesus and after they believed Paul's presentation of the gospel and came to saving faith in Christ, they were then baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. Paul laid hands on them to receive the Holy Spirit (which was not the case in Acts 2 and Acts 10 and is the exception, not the rule).
No, you are judging the hearts.There are plenty of unbelievers who have been water baptized, especially those who attend various false religions and cults that merely "claim" to be Christian. Now such people may believe "mental assent" in the existence and in historical facts about Jesus, including that His death, burial and resurrection "happened," yet such people fail to trust in the death, burial and resurrection of Christ as the ALL-sufficient means of their salvation. (1 Corinthians 15:1-4; Romans 1:16) These "nominal" Christians trust in works for salvation (and not in Christ alone) and fall short of saving belief.
Acts 2:38 says more than repent.The rope?
repent is the rope?
Because acts 2:38 Says to repent and you will be given the gift of the spirit,
repenting would be like a drowning person who tells the rescuer no, he does not want to be rescued, he loves where he is, he does not see his danger, and will continue to flounder until he dies, who changes his mind, because he sees he is hopeless and says yes, please rescue me, and allows the rescuer to PULL him out of the water to safety,
baptism would occur after, it would be like the man saying go and wash yourself and tell thenworld what happened here today so if they can Realize they are drowning tool and possibly by your testimony they will say yes also.