Eternally Grateful
Well-Known Member
- Proverbs 14:12
There is a way that seems right to a man, But its end is the way of death
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Oftentimes atheists ask really good questions that Christians just blow off. Since we can't answer their common sense.You would think Stephen Hawking had this common sense you are taking about, but he turned out to be a fool, confounded by the Biblic concepts that a child can perceive. ... Richard Dawkins, an atheist has this common sense. It is meaningless to take all of it with him through the door. ...
Okay.This was your list of topics that you frequently post about:
1) Universalism (UR)
2) The law, the Law, God's law, Christ's law (four different things)
3) LGBT issues and the church
People with common sense have a problem with those topics, can't seem to sort them out as to what is truth and what isn't.
There are many valid and worthy questions that need to be answered. I had hundreds and God answered them in due time. My brother is smart, accomplished, a millionaire. I would say he has lots of common sense, but he is an atheist and has these huge obstacles secured firmly, preventing him to see God.Oftentimes atheists ask really good questions that Christians just blow off. Since we can't answer their common sense.
/
What do you make of these references to water baptism?It leaves me with the Apostles Ministry and not the Catholics. Here's some data on the water...
Water baptism is a carryover from part of the Levitical Law. There are many examples of people in the Old Testament who would wash themselves with water as a final step to being clean. Water baptism was an outward sign of washing, and then you would be clean to God. Baptism in water, and the need to be circumcised passed away with the coming of Pentecost, as did the other Levitical Laws. To be led by the spirit is to not be under the yoke of bondage with the extreme of legalism, seeking the works of the flesh from the old covenant concerning the past Law administration that was written to Israel.
It's clear from the gospels that water baptism had to do with the kingdom, which was ministered by John who was known as the Baptizer, and not a minister for the Church of God. John who was a prophet functioning under the old covenant was appointed by God to prepare and confirm the promises made to Israel. His message was to tell those who lived under the old covenant that the king had come and “the kingdom of heaven is at hand.” He used water as a sign to baptize those who believed the promised Messiah would be coming in just a matter of months and to illustrate that he would be the Christ, who would baptize them not with material water, but with holy spirit, which is “power from on high.” From the habit of tradition, and only for a short period of time, a small handful of people were baptized with water into the New Testament, but never again afterwards.
In the epistles written just a little bit past the beginning of the New Testament is where we read the only time water baptism is mentioned is to note there is no more need for it, and that we are now to be baptized with holy spirit. And this is why in Acts 2:38, Peter commands “Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ.” In Acts 8:16, Peter and John “baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.” In Acts 10:48, Peter “commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord.” In Romans 6:3, it declares “that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ.” There is not one exception to this practice where we see water baptism, which belonged to the time period when Christ walked the earth, being used once the Church of God had become established.
Agree.There are many valid and worthy questions that need to be answered.
Is that scripture the enemy of common sense?
- Proverbs 14:12
There is a way that seems right to a man, But its end is the way of death
There is a way that seems right to a manIs that scripture the enemy of common sense?
Ask yourself what made you parrot that apologetic in this discussion.
Do you leave your common sense in the car when you walk across the parking lot to go to church?
/
Do you think that some are gullible to bad doctrine?
/
Would you be gullible to common stupidity if someone claimed it was biblical truth?
/
That sounds like a bit of a conundrum.There is a way that seems right to a man
This is what the man considers common sense. We all have our opinion of what that is, we all have our own common sense values.
But the end is the way of death
We better make sure what seems common sense to us is the truth of God. or this is where we are headed
I already mentioned Acts 8:36 when I said... From the habit of tradition, and only for a short period of time, a small handful of people were baptized with water into the New Testament, but never again afterwards.What do you make of these references to water baptism?
Acts 8:36 NIV
As they traveled along the road, they came to some water and the eunuch said,
“Look, here is water. What can stand in the way of my being baptized?”
Acts 10:47 NIV
“Surely no one can stand in the way of their being baptized with water.
They have received the Holy Spirit just as we have.”
1 Peter 3:21 NIV
and this water symbolizes baptism that now saves you also—
not the removal of dirt from the body but the pledge of a clear conscience
toward God.[a] It saves you by the resurrection of Jesus Christ,
'
Agree. My use of gullible was a bit harsh, but needed to be said, I suppose.I don't believe that people, Christians, are intentionally gullible.
I already mentioned Acts 8:36 when I said... From the habit of tradition, and only for a short period of time, a small handful of people were baptized with water into the New Testament, but never again afterwards.
As they traveled along the road, they came to some water and the eunuch said,
“Look, here is water. What can stand in the way of my being baptized?”
Acts 10:47 mentions water but none was used. Verse 48 dose not mention water.
No water mentioned in 1 Peter 3:21
All that water does is get you wet. This should be common sense. Again, it's just more Catholic thinking that is in our culture because they have been around so long.
As usual, You have a hard to understanding what people sayThat sounds like a bit of a conundrum.
You used your literal interpretation of the Bible to declare that
"... a way that seems right to a man" is common sense, "But the end is the way of death".
So, you have clearly declared the use of common sense as leading to death. Right?
But then you explain how to use that common sense.
"We better make sure what seems common sense to us is the truth of God."
How can that be? (based on your senseless declaration)
Do you understand what this topic is about?
/
Why? John told us whyWhy did the Lord submit to being baptized in water? Was He not setting an example for His disciples (Church) to follow?
My apologies St Steven. I don't mean to highjack your thread!
Here is your premise.I already mentioned Acts 8:36 when I said... From the habit of tradition, and only for a short period of time, a small handful of people were baptized with water into the New Testament, but never again afterwards.
As they traveled along the road, they came to some water and the eunuch said,
“Look, here is water. What can stand in the way of my being baptized?”
Acts 10:47 mentions water but none was used. Verse 48 dose not mention water.
No water mentioned in 1 Peter 3:21
All that water does is get you wet. This should be common sense. Again, it's just more Catholic thinking that is in our culture because they have been around so long.
Now you are including workarounds to accommodate your weak premise. IMHOBaptism in water, and the need to be circumcised passed away with the coming of Pentecost, as did the other Levitical Laws.
Well, the Body of Christ is composed of 2.65+ billion believers. We respond collectively concerning the fundamentals in the Bible. Then there are the doctrines that are blurry at best, mysterious, things we typically debate over. So things we can be certain about, we usually unite. Catholics and Prostestants can unite over basic fundamentals. They don't squablle about them usually, they squabble about most everything else.Agree.
But how does the church respond?
/
No worries.My apologies St Steven. I don't mean to highjack your thread!