I honestly did not understand some of it
i get you, and i don't mean to say that the guy is completely wrong or anything, or that nothing could be learned from him; the "God-Breathed" part i like, but then he immediately negates the necessary "breath" in the next para seems to me.
His logic chain apparently goes "Word requires breath; God breathed It, and some inspired person wrote it down. Now some other guys came along later and decided whether it should be included in the "canon" or not, and some other guys translated it into English for us to read, but nevermind all that, Every Word in the Bible is Straight from God's Mouth to Your Ear."
most of it is unsupportable i guess, and you can even read the first para where the guy acknowledges understanding the nature of "Word" before he falls off a cliff and starts (essentially) commending "Easter" too; but see, "Easter" is
Word to him, and "Scripture" means "only Bible" to him too. And imo he is not evil or being deliberately deceptive; he is just deceived, playing oracle, making statements of belief as if they were Absolute Truths--generally a dead giveaway--and not even trying to support the statements with the Bible, bc he cannot. i mean you gotta believe that if he had any support for his "Apostles" statement he would have Quoted it.
"Plenary inspiration means that all the words of Scripture are given by God, not just some of them."
hoist by his own petard, see. His arg for "Easter" is surely "God (the RCC, to him) changed it."
"Paul says all Scripture—everything received as canon—is God’s Word, not just select portions of it (
2 Tim. 3:16)."
Paul was talking about Scripture and not "canon," but this guy needs it to say "canon," so he just added "canon" i guess?
and it's RC Sproul, i teethed on this guy, many years ago, imo he is a great first teacher. Also the sermon this was derived from might be 50 years old, who knows.