Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
3 men..... 1 author........The Holy Spirit......... Let's always remember to always keep our eyes on the Prize.daq said:So far we have:
1) Lukos-Gamaliel the beloved Doctor of the Law, ("Lukos the White").
2) Sha'ul-Saulos-Paulos-Petros, ("Paulos the Little").
3) Simonos-BarYonah-Petros-Petra-Paulos, ("Simon Peter")
So everyone here agrees on the same author? :lol:
Yes of course but that truth is already a given. "Sometimes, well-meaning individuals get so "out-there" with their theories, that their ropes attached to their moorings and anchors are stretched beyond the breaking point and they fly off to La-la-land!" So I suppose my ropes and moorings got stretched too far outside the box once again! Perhaps I should discontinue thinking out loud but I was speaking more along the following "mooring" lines. :)Trumpeter said:3 men..... 1 author........The Holy Spirit.........
Hmm, daq. This, indeed, is pasture for today. Thanks for drawing us into your corner of the field. 'My sheep hear my voice'. :)daq said:Yes of course but that truth is already a given. "Sometimes, well-meaning individuals get so "out-there" with their theories, that their ropes attached to their moorings and anchors are stretched beyond the breaking point and they fly off to La-la-land!" So I suppose my ropes and moorings got stretched too far outside the box once again! Perhaps I should discontinue thinking out loud but I was speaking more along the following "mooring" lines. :)
John 21:14-17
14. This is now the third time that Yeshua showed himself to his disciples, after that he was risen from the dead.
15. So when they had dined, Yeshua says to Simoni Petro, "Simon, Yoannou, do you agapao-love me more than these?" He says unto him, Yea, Master; you know that I phileo-love thee. He says unto him:
"Bosko-Pasture my arnion-lambkins!" [Newborns of the Uncircumcision?]
16. And says to him again a second time, "Simon, Yoannou, do you agapao-love me?" He says unto him, Yea, Master; you know that I phileo-love thee. He says unto him:
"Poimaino-Shepherd my probaton-sheep!" [Newborns of the Circumcision?]
17. And says unto him the third time, "Simon, Yoannou, do you phileo-love me?" Petros then was grieved because he said unto him the third time, "Do you phileo-love me?" And he said unto him, Master, you know all things; you know that I phileo-love thee. Yeshua says unto him:
"Bosko-Pasture my probaton-sheep!" [One Sheepfold?]
Acts 15:7 KJV
7. And when there had been much disputing, Peter rose up, and said unto them, Men and brethren, ye know how that a good while ago God made choice among us, that the Gentiles by my mouth should hear the word of the gospel, and believe.
Perhaps there be some that shall arrive at the pearly gates, (I speak foolishly with my moorings loosed) expecting to find Peter standing before the Door because they do not accept the teachings of Paul. And yet perhaps there be likewise many more that shall arrive at the pearly gates expecting to be greeted by Paul because they say the message of Peter was only for "the Circumcision" and therefore does not concern themselves, (the same do the same with the doctrines of James without naming names in a time saving rhyme! :lol: ). But what if the twain anthropon man-faced Petros-Paulos are simply two different countenances of the one and same andres-man in Messiah? How devastating it would be to arrive at the pearly gates, expecting to be greeted by the one and suddenly be met by the other which was rejected and neglected! Oh my! So much for that kingdom in the sky! Therefore I simply eat of the grass wheresoever the Master has brought me to rest in any particular given day.h34r:
Petros; Tarry in the inner court and Shepherd my probaton-sheep!
Yochanan; Thrust out the outer court and measure it not: for it is given to the Gentiles!Paulos; Go out into the outer court and bring them in that their hearts may be circumcised!
Greetings daq,daq said:Yes of course but that truth is already a given. "Sometimes, well-meaning individuals get so "out-there" with their theories, that their ropes attached to their moorings and anchors are stretched beyond the breaking point and they fly off to La-la-land!" So I suppose my ropes and moorings got stretched too far outside the box once again! Perhaps I should discontinue thinking out loud but I was speaking more along the following "mooring" lines. :)
John 21:14-17
14. This is now the third time that Yeshua showed himself to his disciples, after that he was risen from the dead.
15. So when they had dined, Yeshua says to Simoni Petro, "Simon, Yoannou, do you agapao-love me more than these?" He says unto him, Yea, Master; you know that I phileo-love thee. He says unto him:
"Bosko-Pasture my arnion-lambkins!" [Newborns of the Uncircumcision?]
16. And says to him again a second time, "Simon, Yoannou, do you agapao-love me?" He says unto him, Yea, Master; you know that I phileo-love thee. He says unto him:
"Poimaino-Shepherd my probaton-sheep!" [Newborns of the Circumcision?]
17. And says unto him the third time, "Simon, Yoannou, do you phileo-love me?" Petros then was grieved because he said unto him the third time, "Do you phileo-love me?" And he said unto him, Master, you know all things; you know that I phileo-love thee. Yeshua says unto him:
"Bosko-Pasture my probaton-sheep!" [One Sheepfold?]
Acts 15:7 KJV
7. And when there had been much disputing, Peter rose up, and said unto them, Men and brethren, ye know how that a good while ago God made choice among us, that the Gentiles by my mouth should hear the word of the gospel, and believe.
Perhaps there be some that shall arrive at the pearly gates, (I speak foolishly with my moorings loosed) expecting to find Peter standing before the Door because they do not accept the teachings of Paul. And yet perhaps there be likewise many more that shall arrive at the pearly gates expecting to be greeted by Paul because they say the message of Peter was only for "the Circumcision" and therefore does not concern themselves, (the same do the same with the doctrines of James without naming names in a time saving rhyme! :lol: ). But what if the twain anthropon man-faced Petros-Paulos are simply two different countenances of the one and same andres-man in Messiah? How devastating it would be to arrive at the pearly gates, expecting to be greeted by the one and suddenly be met by the other which was rejected and neglected! Oh my! So much for that kingdom in the sky! Therefore I simply eat of the grass wheresoever the Master has brought me to rest in any particular given day.h34r:
Petros; Tarry in the inner court and Shepherd my probaton-sheep!
Yochanan; Thrust out the outer court and measure it not: for it is given to the Gentiles!Paulos; Go out into the outer court and bring them in that their hearts may be circumcised!
You're certainly welcome but it really isn't just my corner of the field to be sure! :)dragonfly said:Hmm, daq. This, indeed, is pasture for today. Thanks for drawing us into your corner of the field. 'My sheep hear my voice'. :)
Trumpeter said:Greetings daq,
Mat 16:17 Jesus answered and said to him, "Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah, for flesh and blood has not revealed [this] to you, but My Father who is in heaven.
God bless.
And of what materials are the twain Cherubim inside the Oracle Holy Holies made from? The answer would be Olive Tree, (1 Kings 6:23, Jeremiah 11, Romans 11) and then the Cherubim were hammered-overlaid with pure gold having been tried in the fire, (1 Kings 6:28, Revelation 3:18). So which one is the elect Simonos Petros? He is the one you have quoted herein above: Simonos Bar-Yonah the "son" of Jonah the prophet from Matthew 16:17-18, for in the same passage one of the "other" Simoni is called the Satan:daq said:Every man entering into Yeshua Faith has four faces, (for the countenance of the Lion of Yehuda is the face of a young lion) and the man is like a great city which shall be divided into three parts. Two parts of the man-faced shall be cut off and die:
Matthew 26:30-31 KJV
30. And when they had sung an hymn, they went out into the mount of Olives.
31. Then saith Jesus unto them, All ye shall be offended because of me this night: for it is written, I will smite the shepherd, and the sheep of the flock shall be scattered abroad.
Zechariah 13:7-9 KJV
7. Awake, O sword, against my shepherd, and against the man that is my fellow, saith the Lord of hosts: smite the shepherd, and the sheep shall be scattered: and I will turn mine hand upon the little ones.
8. And it shall come to pass, that in all the land, saith the Lord, two parts therein shall be cut off and die; but the third shall be left therein.
9. And I will bring the third part through the fire, and will refine them as silver is refined, and will try them as gold is tried: they shall call on my name, and I will hear them: I will say, It is my people: and they shall say, The Lord is my God.
Every man is like a parcel of land and two parts therein shall be cut off and die; and the Most High will bring the third part of the man through the fire, refining him as silver is refined, and trying him as pure gold is tried in the fire; and the third part of the man shall be of the people of YHWH Elohim. Now therefore, (O ye cherubim) which of the "three rocks" is the genuine Simon? :)
Simonos Simonos Petros - Simon Simon Peter-Rock (Mattityahu 16:23, Lukas 22:31)
Simonos bar-Iona - Simon son of Yonah-Jonah - Simon Petros-Rock (Mattityahu 16:18)
Simonos huios Ioannou - Simon son of Yochanan-John - Simon Kephas-Rock (Yochanan 1:42, Galatians 2:9)
Revelation 3:12-13 KJV
12. Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my God, and he shall go no more out: and I will write upon him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, which is new Jerusalem, which cometh down out of heaven from my God: and I will write upon him my new name.
13. He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches.
Ezekiel 41:18-21 KJV
18. And it was made with Cherubims and palm trees, so that a palm tree was between a cherub and a cherub; and every cherub had two faces;
19. So that the face of a man was toward the palm tree on the one side, and the face of a young lion toward the palm tree on the other side: it was made through all the house round about.
Granted, I was feeling tired and skipped a few steps. I was talking about the prepositions:daq said:What are you talking about? It seems you are willing to make things up to support your own conclusions:
Galatians 4:26 TUA (Transliterated Unaccented Bible)
26. He de ano Ierousalem eleuthera estin, hetis estin meter {*}hemon,
Galatians 4:26 LIT (Literal Bible with Strong's Vertical Ref.#s)
26.
|3588| the
|1161| But
|0507| above
|2419| Jerusalem
|1658| free
|2076| is,
|3748| who
|2076| is
|3384| mother
|2257| of us.
Original Strong's Ref. #507
Romanized ano
Pronounced an'-o
adverb from GSN0473; upward or on the top:
KJV--above, brim, high, up.
"Jerusalem of above" is not "an unfortunate word used for translation of anoo" but rather exactly what the text states.
John 8:21-23 KJV
21. Then said Jesus again unto them, I go my way, and ye shall seek me, and shall die in your sins: whither I go, ye cannot come.
22. Then said the Jews, Will he kill himself? because he saith, Whither I go, ye cannot come.
23. And he said unto them, Ye are from beneath; I am from above: [GSN#507 ano] ye are of this world; I am not of this world.
24. I said therefore unto you, that ye shall die in your sins: for if ye believe not that I am he, ye shall die in your sins.
Anothen comes from ano and means exactly "from above" as employed in the famous John 3 passage:
John 3:3 LIT
3.
|0611| answered
|2424| Jesus
|2532| and
|2036| said
|0846| to him,
|0281| Truly,
|0281| truly,
|3004| I say
|4671| to you,
|3362| Except
|5100| one
|1080| receive birth
|0509| from above,
|3756| not
|1410| he is able
|1492| to see
|3588| the
|0932| kingdom
|3588| of
|2316| God!
Original Strong's Ref. #509
Romanized anothen
Pronounced an'-o-then
from GSN0507; from above; by analogy, from the first; by implication, anew:
KJV--from above, again, from the beginning (very first), the top.
Shall we now alter the theological foundation of what it means to be "born from above" so as to suit your theories?
The Testimony of Yeshua is the Spirit of prophecy! :)
. . .
If you want an adequate answer perhaps you will need to start another thread, (so as not to derail this one). Perhaps you, (and any others who see things according to your perspective) should open a new thread and lay out all of your Scripture passages which support your case. Likewise please include all of your definitions of the terms which you employ in your statements. For instance what exactly do you mean by "resurrected body" when you speak of Messiah returning? Do you mean resurrected immortal flesh? Likewise there are many other terms and definitions which need to be well defined before one can adequately respond to your question. However, in the case of this thread, (which appears to be focused on the Epistle to the Hebrews) my response is thus:ENOCH2010 said:daq I ask again do you believe Jesus the Christ is coming back to Earth with his resurrected body to rule and reign as King of Kings for ever.
Well, the truth is that Daq doesn't have that great of a handle on what I believe, either. He THINKS he does, but that's as far as it goes. You fail to understand that it is not a battle between the spirit and the flesh. It's a battle between the WORKS of the spirit and the WORKS of the flesh. Daq has this misunderstanding, as well. To the contrary, God is working in us to rectify the discrepancy. It's not to be either the spirit or the flesh; they are to be in SYNC with each other! They are to be ON THE SAME PAGE! The problem is not the flesh; the challenge is trusting in the flesh ALONE!dragonfly said:...
Hi Retrobyter,
Having not followed other of your arguments (except when I'm interested in a thread where you are posting), I don't have quite as clear an idea as daq seems to have, about the length and breadth of how you interpret scripture; but I do keep coming up against your fixation with the earthly, and your regular denigration of the invisible spiritual truth which the earthly was created to expound. Romans 1:20 (and 19)
In your last post in this thread, there is very little difference between your explanation of the 'continuing city', and daq's, except that you tend to preface your expostion with a negative statement, as if you really don't see that creation displays the invisible things of God all the time.
As far as getting people to look up, and remain seated with Christ in heavenly places, it most certainly is about the contrast. Far too many so-called believers have fallen for false doctrine based on faulty reading of scriptures. The permanence we can expect is not in this life, in fleshly terms.
This (in bold) is an interesting statement indeed, for since when has the Spirit been able to 'work' anything, without the co-operation of the body?You fail to understand that it is not a battle between the spirit and the flesh. It's a battle between the WORKS of the spirit and the WORKS of the flesh.
Perhaps the "works of the Spirit" is not exactly a correct way to say it, but have you never read Galatians 3:1-8ff?dragonfly said:Hi Retrobyter,
This (in bold) is an interesting statement indeed, for since when has the Spirit been able to 'work' anything, without the co-operation of the body?
The flesh as we have it now is to be the servant of the Spirit, in order that the spirit and soul of the man be saved through the fire of physical death, ready to be clothed upon with immortality and incorruption. The 'flesh' as we know it, is doomed to destruction for the purpose of being raised in a new body.
I'm not sure if your reference to 'the works of the flesh' is linked in your thinking to Paul's definition in Galatians 5, but if it is, then there is no room whatever for those 'works of the flesh' in the Christian life. Do you agree?
The other kind of 'works of the flesh' - the keeping of an outward religion by the following of rituals and rules - is also condemned by Paul as a 'going about to establish' one's 'own righteousness', rather than receiving Christ's righteousness through faith.
These also have to be buried with Christ in the present tense, so that the new inner life in the Spirit is being lived out through the same 'old' body, until it really does fall into the grave and dies, literally. Until we get our resurrected 'flesh' our life cannot be based on 'the flesh' we've got. It has to be based on our knowledge of God through the Spirit and our active obedience to His commands, guidance, leadings and promptings, which usually will militate against our 'flesh', because God knows that's good for our souls.
And you have tried to slide out of acknowledging my point overtly, by changing the subject to sin, and directing your remarks towards the work of Christ instead of what you were talking about before, which was the legitimacy of 'flesh' in the Christian believer - or not.You fail to understand that it is not a battle between the spirit and the flesh. It's a battle between the WORKS of the spirit and the WORKS of the flesh.
You know, this is not what the Bible says?having the Ruach haQodesh do the work
The first man Adam is yatsar which is "to form" or "to shape" as clay in the hands of the Potter:dragonfly said:Hi daq,
I very much like how you explained the relevance of the Old Covenant to the New Covenant, and your focus on the throne of grace. I've heard a lot of preaching about both Covenants, but never quite in the way you chose to pitch it in your post, keeping your eye on the city to come. :)