OSAS beginning ?

[Joseph77]

osas was totally unknown in the Israelites/ or anywhere on earth.

It is a plague, or false teaching, that developed later.

 

[Eternally Grateful]

Total erroneous , especially since you were already corrected several times.

Perhaps an English Teacher is needed to explain the difference in what I posted, and what you assumed ?

lol wow dude

Can you spell condemned? Because I showed where you said it not once but twice!!!

once again

if you did not mean what you said, You could have stopped this whole line of questioning by just explaining what you meant, instead of calling me a liar.

Would that not be much easier?

 

[Joseph77]

My motive is nothing but to try to show you those people never repented.

That MIGHT be important to you if you are trying to support the false doctrine, the false teaching,
but it has no bearing at all on my posts.

 

[Eternally Grateful]

osas was totally unknown in the Israelites/ or anywhere on earth.

It is a plague, or false teaching, that developed later.

So Jesus lied when he said whoever believes in him will NEVER DIE LIVE FOREVER, HAS ETERNAL LIFE, WILL BE RESURRECTED, HAS PASSED FROM DEATH TO LIFE, and OUT OF HIS HEART WILL FLOW RIVERS OF LIVING WATER FLOWING TO ETERNAL LIFE. (john 3, John 4, John 5, John 6)

And his disciple lied when he said we can KNOW WE HAVE ETERNAL LIFE. (1 John 5)

 

[Eternally Grateful]

That MIGHT be important to you if you are trying to support the false doctrine, the false teaching,
but it has no bearing at all on my posts.

Your the one who claimed the repented. and now is denying itand can repent all they want, and it will never help them

Its ok.. This is not the first time you made a comment you failed to back up.

 

[Eternally Grateful]

OT saints in their time under OSAS, actually died in the faith, short of eternal life.
Because eternal life was not given yet.
So OSAS in the OT was only good for getting a resurrection.

?

WHAT?????????

 

[Joseph77]

lol wow dude
Can you spell condemned? Because I showed where you said it not once but twice!!!
once again. if you did not mean what you said, You could have stopped this whole line of questioning by just explaining what you meant, instead of calling me a liar. Would that not be much easier?

The word condemned is in many posts, including mine. So what ? Then,
You posted a lie. What more need be said?
When corrected, again,
You repeatedly lied. What more will help ?

Do you want to start over, and see where you erred, or not ? (most simply - "EASIER" AS YOU SAY)

 

[Joseph77]

Your the one who claimed the repented. and now is denying itand can repent all they want, and it will never help them

Its ok.. This is not the first time you made a comment you failed to back up.

There has been no indication from your posts that you cared what was posted, nor about your errors.

 

[Eternally Grateful]

The word condemned is in many posts, including mine. So what ? Then,
You posted a lie. What more need be said?
When corrected, again,
You repeatedly lied. What more will help ?

Do you want to start over, and see where you erred, or not ? (most simply - "EASIER" AS YOU SAY)

lol

so you said it

I showed you said it

but I lied. by saying you said it?

Is english your native language? Maybe thats the disconnect?

either way, I have asked you multiple times now that if I misunderstood you to please explain what you meant.

And since you have YET to show me what you meant, and refuse to do so. I must conclude I am correct in my assessment

either way,

lol.

I am on the floor laughing, thanks, I have had a rotten day, You just made my day for me.

 

[Eternally Grateful]

There has been no indication from your posts that you cared what was posted, nor about your errors.

its not my errors friend

its comments you have made I asked you to explain.

I am sorry if you do not like to be called out when someone does not agree with you.

 

[Joseph77]

its not my errors friend

its comments you have made I asked you to explain.

I am sorry if you do not like to be called out when someone does not agree with you.

You posted false witness and assumptions you made - you did NOT seek an explanation .

Yes, you are sorry, but not in the right way.

 

[Joseph77]

I showed you said it

but I lied. by saying you said it?

Your false posts are still present, in which you claimed I said something I did not ever say nor post.

That is a sad, sad, testimony.

 

[Eternally Grateful]

You posted false witness and assumptions you made - you did NOT seek an explanation .

Yes, you are sorry, but not in the right way.

lol

I asked for an explanation numerous times man, do I have to prove that too?

wow. Just wow!

 

[Eternally Grateful]

Your false posts are still present, in which you claimed I said something I did not ever say nor post.

That is a sad, sad, testimony.

this is like someone having video where he is caught throwing a rock in a window. and after he is shown the video of his throwing the rock.

He still deny's he threw the rock and broke the window

 

[Joseph77]

this is like someone having video where he is caught throwing a rock in a window. and after he is shown the video of his throwing the rock.

He still deny's he threw the rock and broke the window

So do you still desire to see where you broke the first window, or rather find out what is meant in the posts you could not understand ?

 

[Eternally Grateful]

You posted false witness and assumptions you made - you did NOT seek an explanation .

Yes, you are sorry, but not in the right way.

So if I misunderstood you Then explain what you MEANT to say.

lol wow dude

Can you spell condemned? Because I showed where you said it not once but twice!!!

once again

if you did not mean what you said, You could have stopped this whole line of questioning by just explaining what you meant, instead of calling me a liar.

Would that not be much easier?

yet I am the one who bears false wtness

 

[Eternally Grateful]

So do you still desire to see where you broke the first window, or rather find out what is meant in the posts you could not understand ?

feel free

I asked you twice now to explain how I misunderstood you

You said many have never repented

OTHERS. can repent all they want

by saying others. How can I get that to mean anything other than these people are NOT of those who never repented.

And can you explain how they could ever have repented all they want?

 

[Joseph77]

yet I am the one who bears false wtness

True, but no worries - we hope, there is time - we hope, to repent.
Back to the start of the 'conversation' >>>

Hi EG,
Yes, both were in sin. I realize you could not know this unless you have read every single post of mine from the past HOWEVER I have routinely condemned the actions of ALL the men/women who killed in the name of Christ. It doesn't matter if they were Protestant or Catholic I pointed out and condemned both.
Sadly, on this forum, people want to only point out the actions of the CC and ignore the log in their own eye.

So, who condemns them ? Mary ? NO.
God? YES! ( unless you really think Mary has that power to do)

YOU just in this post POINT OUT what? "the actions of the CC".
THAT is enough for them to be condemned.
The log in anyone else's eye will not at all, ever, release them from their eternal condemnation.

Thus, "the actions of the CC" are enough for them to be condemned." (as the Bible says first, then Mary, and I agree) ...

Mary said she did, but she does not have the power to do so, not eternally (no man does).
Jesus says He does, and He Does have the Power to DO SO.

I am not one of them
I call sin a sin. It does not matter who commited the sin. No one is perfect

You are not one of who ? Good - call sin a sin. That is good. Yes.

 

[Joseph77]

And can you explain how they could ever have repented all they want?

Do you remember who is it written about,

that there is NO LONGER ANY SACRIFICE for their sin ?

No matter how many times they repent, or try to repent, or seek repentance, there is no more any atonement for their sin(s).
Same if they do not repent, or do not try to repent, or do not seek repentance.

(like Esau - remember )

 

[Eternally Grateful]

True, but no worries - we hope, there is time - we hope, to repent.
Back to the start of the 'conversation' >>>

So, who condemns them ? Mary ? NO.
God? YES! ( unless you really think Mary has that power to do)

Thus, "the actions of the CC" are enough for them to be condemned." (as the Bible says first, then Mary, and I agree) ...

Mary said she did, but she does not have the power to do so, not eternally (no man does).
Jesus says He does, and He Does have the Power to DO SO.

You are not one of who ? Good - call sin a sin. That is good. Yes.

Yes,

And I asked why the protestant church who did the same should not be condemned also. did I not?

And this is in your view the truth. All church makes mistakes. so shoud all churches be condemned?