That is not what Jesus said, that is what Protestants claim Jesus said. You don't understand. Amoris Laetitia did not cause more annulments, that's absurd.
I have a big problem reconciling what Jesus commanded with a person having to remain alone a whole lifetime. So do I listen to Jesus or a church?
Did Paul even understand what Jesus wanted??
Your big problem is not understanding what Jesus commanded, which is the same as what the Church teaches. In fact, separating what Jesus commanded from what the Church teaches is Protestantism to the core. Therefore you don't know what the Church teaches or you are a closet Protestant.
There is no divorce in the CC. We cannot summarize reasons for divorce in a forum because each case is different. You have blurred the difference between divorce and annulments. Most of the readers in this forum are anti-Catholic and you are sowing seeds of confusion and I am left with giving long explanations of divorce and annulment that's off topic. You should read the Catholic understanding of Matthew 19:9 and leave the erroneous Protestant view alone.
Oh, we can't have people pick up the pieces of their shattered lives, and get married (there is no remarriage). Let's keep them miserable. Tribunals don't let excuses go by that easily. Again, you don't know what you are talking about.
Your faulty interpretation of a complex document is not ok. But you are under the influence of cheap media tabloids that twist Amoris Laetitia and numerous other church documents into something that is unrecognizable.
"...yours is the Protestant position and it is based on a misunderstanding of the application of the Exception Clause. Here is why. Protestants want to except adultery from porneia because they incorrectly interpret the Exception Clause to apply to both the divorce and remarriage. They (at least many of them) correctly believe that it is immoral to divorce and remarry for adultery. Thus, they believe that porneia cannot mean adultery because, according to their interpretation, it is permissible to divorce and remarry for reasons other than adultery (i.e., incest). If porneia included adultery, then, according to their interpretation, it would be okay to divorce and remarry for adultery but this is not true. That is why they argue that porneia does NOT include adultery. You have fallen into this error, and it makes your exegesis of Matthew 19:9 also erroneous.
The weight of the exegetical evidence, as well as the Church Fathers and Medievals (Clement of Alexandria, Basil, Ambrose, Jerome, Augustine, Gregory the Great, Lombard, Bonaventure, Aquinas, Bellarmine) and the Council of Trent, all side with the Catholic position (which, of course, happens to be my position as well): the Exception Clause applies to the divorce only, not the remarriage.
Porneia, Divorce, and Remarriage ::[/QUOTE]
I don't read cheap media tabloids.
First of all, I'm not that type.
Second of all I live in Italy.
Thirdly, I'm trained in the Catholic church with all its doctrine.
I'll answer your post later on.