More avoidance!
Mat 21:33 Hear another parable: There was a certain householder, which planted a vineyard, and hedged it round about, and digged a winepress in it, and built a tower, and let it out to husbandmen, and went into a far country:
Mat 21:34 And when the time of the fruit drew near, he sent his servants to the husbandmen, that they might receive the fruits of it.
Mat 21:35 And the husbandmen took his servants (the Old Testament prophets), and beat one, and killed another, and stoned another.
Mat 21:36 Again, he sent other servants more than the first (more Old Testament prophets): and they did unto them likewise.
Mat 21:37 But last of all he sent unto them his son (Christ Jesus), saying, They will reverence my son.
Mat 21:38 But when the husbandmen saw the son, they said among themselves, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, and let us seize on his inheritance.
Mat 21:39 And they caught him, and cast him out of the vineyard, and slew him (Calvary).
Mat 21:40 When the lord therefore of the vineyard cometh, what will he do unto those husbandmen?
Mat 21:41 They say unto him, He will miserably destroy those wicked men, and will let out his vineyard unto other husbandmen, which shall render him the fruits in their seasons.
Mat 21:42 Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes?
Mat 21:43 Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.
Mat 21:44 And whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder.
Mat 21:45 And when the chief priests and Pharisees had heard his parables, they perceived that he spake of them.
Mat 21:46 But when they sought to lay hands on him, they feared the multitude, because they took him for a prophet.
The meaning of this parable is very clear. The disciples grasped it easily. Those that have eyes to see and ears to hear will grasp it. This is teaching about the approaching day of reckoning for man. It all concludes at the coming of Jesus Christ. This is when the righteous are rewarded and the wicked are punished. It is the end. The coming of the Lord is a climatic event. There's no space for your imaginary future millennium. It is all in your head.
This final event sees the wicked judged and destroyed. They are then cast into the lake of fire.
I can't make heads or tails out of how you are interpreting this parable? You are going on about--" This is teaching about the approaching day of reckoning for man. It all concludes at the coming of Jesus Christ. This is when the righteous are rewarded and the wicked are punished. It is the end". Then you insist this parable proves there is no millennium that follows the 2nd coming. I don't think you are even reading this parable correctly since I don't see anything in the parable involving what you seem to see it involving.
Mat 21:40 When the lord therefore of the vineyard cometh, what will he do unto those husbandmen?
41 They say unto him, He will miserably destroy those wicked men, and will let out his vineyard unto other husbandmen, which shall render him the fruits in their seasons.
What does Amil vs Premil have to do with verse 41 if you have verse 40 meaning the last day of this age? Verse 41 indicates---He will miserably destroy those wicked men, and will let out his vineyard unto other husbandmen, which shall render him the fruits in their seasons. Since when do Amils, such as yourself, have seasons still taking place after the final day of this age?
Until He miserably destroys those wicked men first when He comes, He can't do this in the meantime--and will let out his vineyard unto other husbandmen, which shall render him the fruits in their seasons. That's meaning after He destroys those wicked men, not before He destroys them.
Did you not see this in the parable--And when the chief priests and Pharisees had heard his parables, they perceived that he spake of them? What does that have to do with the last day of this age? It seems to me the last day of this age is not meant in verse 40, what is meant is 70 AD. As if a parable pertaining to 70 AD somehow leaves no space for there to be a millennium after the 2nd coming.
What is it about some of you around here at times? When the first century is meant, some of you want it to mean the 21st century instead. And when the 21st century is meant(Matthew 24:15-21), some of you same ones want it to mean the first century instead. That aside. Imagine that, attempting to debunk Premil via a parable involving the first century and 70 AD.