Explain what you mean?I do acknowledge that Jesus is God. I don't affirm your belief that Jesus must be divine by nature to be God.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Explain what you mean?I do acknowledge that Jesus is God. I don't affirm your belief that Jesus must be divine by nature to be God.
You truly do not get it. In your opinion, divine kingship, authority, power, rulership, and reigning, suggests complete dictatorial control by the monarch over His subjects, without any space for free-choice or rebellion. Is that how Scripture describes God's reign from the beginning? Of course not. This is an invented definition of your own imagination to support your false teaching.If he was enforcing his authority over all creation, we would see it. We don't see it so I think you need to rethink your interpretation of a few verses.
Saying something doesn't make it true. Have you read the news? Is Jesus defeating his enemies at the moment? No.
Well now that's just weird. <smile>I do acknowledge that Jesus is God. I don't affirm your belief that Jesus must be divine by nature to be God.
LOL. A better question is what didn't you ignore?What did I ignore? Why is it so difficult to understand that since Jesus was going away, he sent his apostles another Paracletos? Your view that Jesus is omnipresent is undermined by the Upper Room discourse. If Jesus was omnipresent as you suggest, he wouldn't need to comfort his disciples concerning his absence. He wouldn't warn them about obeying him in his absence. He wouldn't warn them to treat their fellow servants well in his absence. And he certainly wouldn't need to send ANOTHER Paracletos to help them with their mission, IN HIS ABSENCE.
He is God! Don't tell me He is not omnipresent! You have no idea who He is! I will not stand for your blasphemy!The sentence you quoted, taken out of context, is part of a passage where Jesus warns his disciples about his impending departure. He is going away, and he knows how stressful this will be for them.
The chapter begins
John 14:1-3 Do not let your heart be troubled; believe in God, believe also in Me. In My Father’s house are many dwelling places; if it were not so, I would have told you; for I go to prepare a place for you. If I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again and receive you to Myself, that where I am, there you may be also.
In this passage, our Lord speaks about dwelling places that are found in His Father's house. Jesus is going to His Father’s house to prepare these dwelling places for His disciples. He comforts them by promising to return and receive them. His intention is to bring them to the dwelling places He has prepared, so that they may be there with Him as well.
This addresses your incorrect belief that Jesus is omnipresent.
You have no idea of what you're talking about. None whatsoever. He is one with the Father because He and the Father and the Holy Spirit are one God.Jesus was not a Platonist, so when he says that he and the Father are one, he is referring to the idea that he and the Father teach the same things and share the same attitudes and commitments. They are one in purpose, aims, goals, thinking, desires, and commitments. He isn't saying that he and the Father are of the same nature.
You do not acknowledge that because you do not acknowledge that He is omnipresent and all powerful, as God is. And you do not acknowledge that He currently reigns over all things, as God does.I do acknowledge that Jesus is God. I don't affirm your belief that Jesus must be divine by nature to be God.
Bro, he ignores absolutely every Scripture text that forbids his doctrine. That is his modus operandi. That is his pattern. As he continually does: i presented clear explicit Scripture and he ducked around it. He prefers his heresy to the truth of God.LOL. A better question is what didn't you ignore?
John 14:16 And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever; 17 Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you. 18 I will not leave you comfortless: I will come to you.
You ignored that Jesus said "I will come to you" after saying He would not leave them comfortless and after saying the Father would send them another Comforter, who is "The Spirit of truth" who also is also called "The Spirit of God" and "The Spirit of Christ".
John 14:23 Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.
You also ignore that Jesus said He and the Father would make their abode with those who love Him and keep His words. When the Holy Spirit is present in someone, so are the Father and the Son because, again, the Holy Spirit is also called "The Spirit of God" and "The Spirit of Christ".
He is God! Don't tell me He is not omnipresent! You have no idea who He is! I will not stand for your blasphemy!
John 8:58 Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.
Exodus 3:14 And God said unto Moses, I Am That I Am: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I Am hath sent me unto you.
John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 The same was in the beginning with God.
3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.... 14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
Colossians 1:14 In whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins: 15 Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature: 16 For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: 17 And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.
Regarding the deity of Christ, I reject the definition outlined in the Nicene Creed, which is a synthesis of New Testament teachings and Platonic philosophy. I have no reason to obey the teachings of Plato or the Neoplatonists.You deny the deity of Christ. You deny His current kingship. You deny He is reigning over all, including His enemies. You do!
Absolutely false. Jesus wasn't given all authority in heaven and earth only to have to wait to exercise it for at least 2,000 years. He works through the hearts of His followers and that has resulted in major changes in the world over the past almost 2,000 years and has resulted in "a great multitude that no one can number" being saved during that time (Revelation 7:9).Heb 1:13 KJV But to which of the angels said he at any time, Sit on my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool?
Heb 2:5 KJV For unto the angels hath he not put in subjection the world to come, whereof we speak....
"WHEREOF WE SPEAK..."
The writer is referring to what he said In Heb 1:13.
"THE WORLD TO COME,"
It is NOT the present world that is to be in subjection to the one sitting at his right hand, but it is the "world to come".
Heb 2:7-8 KJV 7 Thou madest him [MAN] a little lower than the angels; thou crownedst him with glory and honour, and didst set him over the works of thy hands: 8 Thou hast put all things in subjection under his feet. For in that he put all in subjection under him, he left nothing that is not put under him. But now we see not yet all things put under him. [HIS FEET!]
SO, how can it be both,
1. All things in subjection under his feet
AND
2. Not yet all things put under him. (???)
How can both be true?
It is because the authority given to the one sitting at God's right hand [ALL AUTHORITY] is for authority over the world to come. He has all authority for the world to come. Only the pre-mill understands this.
Be Blessed
The PuP
You said that he is ruling spiritually in the hearts of his followers. You admit that his rule is limited to that subgroup of people, which is not all of creation.When did i say He was not?
I haven't read them all, but what does it matter? We address each other's ideas and leave motive out of it.Did you see her strange posts?
Any objective person can clearly see that is the case. He is just blatant about it. As if no one can recognize what he's doing. He can't fool us.Bro, he ignores absolutely every Scripture text that forbids his doctrine. That is his modus operandi. That is his pattern. As he continually does: i presented clear explicit Scripture and he ducked around it. He prefers his heresy to the truth of God.
The scriptural evidence is overwhelming. The only way someone can deny these scriptures is if they just don't want to believe them.Premillennialism contradicts scripture (1 Corinthians 15:50-54) by having mortal flesh and blood inheriting the kingdom of God when Jesus returns.
Sitting at the right hand of the Father. What do you think that means? Do you think that means He is literally just sitting down in heaven? Do you think He is doing anything significant right now or mainly just waiting for His chance to use the authority He was given almost 2,000 years ago?www.christianityboard.com
Let us establish an absolute fact: Jesus (being divine) fills all things.
Jesus reassured His followers in Matthew 28:20: “lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen.”
He also said in Matthew 18:20, “For where two or three are gathered together in my Name, there Am I in the midst of them.”
Of course we are dealing with mysteries but I believe Christ is both man and God. As a man He is limited to a physical body, but as God I believe His influence, presence and power are limitless. When it says (and it does explicitly and repeatedly) that Christ is in us I take that to be a spiritual reality. Let’s be honest we are dealing with God.
Of course Christ was speaking here in a spiritual sense.
He was referring to His Omnipresent nature as God. He was not talking about the actual location of His glorified physical body.
Jesus predicted in John 14:20 “In that day you will know that I am in my Father, and you in me, and I in you.”
Jesus explained in John 14:23, “If a man loves me, he will keep my word, and my Father will love him, and we will come to him and make our home with him.”
Paul said in 2 Corinthians 13:5, “Jesus Christ is in you.” By embracing Him in salvation, sinners enter into union with God and become one with Him.
Galatians 3:27 says, “For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.”
In Colossians 1:27 Paul sums up this great truth by telling believers, it is “Christ in you, the hope of glory.”
Romans 8:10 says, "But if Christ is in you, although your bodies are dead because of sin, your spirits are alive because of righteousness"
Galatians 2:20 says: "I have been crucified with Christ; it is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me; and the life I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me"
Ephesians 3:17 says: “that Christ may dwell in your hearts through faith.”
You do believe there is only one Christ? You do believe this is talking about the same Jesus that walked the streets of Jerusalem?
Those who deny Christ’s omnipresence contend that these passages simply mean that Jesus is present “by His Spirit.” In other words: Jesus is not really in us, in our midst, or filling all things – as it says. The Holy Spirit is doing that in His Name. They equate this to the job of an ambassador. The only problem is: those verses do not say that Jesus is present “by His Spirit!” They just say Jesus is present!
Yea right! Just tiptoe round heresy!Well now that's just weird. <smile>
Grace and peace to you.
According to him we're supposedly lacking in humility and grace because we don't sugarcoat heresy. Unbelievable. I guess he must be offended by the way Jesus talked to the Pharisees and scribes in Matthew 23?Yea right! Just tiptoe round heresy!
Yes. That is only half the story. Why do you exclude the rest? You have to. This is what you do with Scripture also. You doubtless do it with history.You said that he is ruling spiritually in the hearts of his followers. You admit that his rule is limited to that subgroup of people, which is not all of creation.
Regarding the deity of Christ, I reject the definition outlined in the Nicene Creed, which is a synthesis of New Testament teachings and Platonic philosophy. I have no reason to obey the teachings of Plato or the Neoplatonists.
I do not deny his kingship. I accept what Jesus said, that he was going away to a far country to receive a kingdom, and that he would enforce his rule when he returned. I believe what David said, that his Lord would rule among his enemies.
And yes, I deny that he is currently reigning over all because that point is self-evident. Look around and see for yourself.
If he was enforcing his authority over all creation, we would see it. We don't see it so I think you need to rethink your interpretation of a few verses.
My intent is to avoid defending my position on this subject here at the risk of having this thread shut down. Perhaps it is best to explain my meaning and then move on.Explain what you mean?
I get what you are saying. But I don't agree with you.You truly do not get it.
It isn't a matter of degree. It's a matter of fact. There is NO EVIDENCE that Jesus is currently in charge.In your opinion, divine kingship, authority, power, rulership, and reigning suggest complete dictatorial control by the monarch over His subjects, without any space for free choice or rebellion.
The Bible makes a distinction between the Father and the Son.Is that how Scripture describes God's reign from the beginning?
He will rule the nations with a rod of iron.Do you truly think that Jesus is going to be a dictator or a tyrant as He reigns.
I didn't describe anything. Are you so eager to be "right" that you are willing to make stuff up?What do you describe is a cultish kingdom, a robotic kingdom or a kingdom of clones.