(facepalm)
Because of your carnal mind, since the Mount of Olives sits east of the city today, has not yet physically split so you believe the prophecy is still future? You lack spiritual discernment.
Would it really matter to someone who already has their mind made up and refuses to be confused by the Biblical "facts?"
The Scriptures say CLEARLY He that fought against the nations was the Lord, and in that day His feet would stand upon the mount of Olives before Jerusalem. This was Christ at His first advent.
Matthew 21:1
- "And when they drew nigh unto Jerusalem, and were come to Bethphage, unto the mount of Olives, then sent Jesus two disciples,"
Matthew 24:3
- "And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world?"
Christ made His triumphant Entry AS KING into Jerusalem from the Mount of Olives. Surely you don't believe this is all coincidence? Their King had come, He did fulfill Scripture, He did rule from Jerusalem, and Everlasting waters did flow. It's not future occurrence, it is Done!
Moreover, who said Zechariah 14 was at His second coming? Was it God's Word itself or you and your teachers? We can see from comparing Scripture with Scripture that to understand the symbolism we need to recognize that Jerusalem, the holy city and bride of God, is representative of the congregation, the People of God. In the Old Testament, that was the Jews and their old testament congregation. Zechariah 14 is in reference to their captivity, the apostasy that had gripped that Old Testament congregation, and this warfare in His congregation (Matthew 11:12) that ushers in the Messiah Himself and His messianic peace, comfort and the (millennial) Kingdom age.
This time of Christ's first advent
is when the Lord defeated the nations/gentiles that came against his people. Not Roman armies, not every physical nation in the world, and not at the end times in His second advent, but these nations (aka Gentiles - the unsaved people) were defeated by the Lord and by His army
in their testimony. That's not rhetoric, but confirmed by Scripture. It was by the shedding of His blood that they were defeated.
Daniel 9:26
- "And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined."
Indeed the people of the Prince, Christ's own people of the Old Testament congregation, did destroy the city and sanctuary, and consequently, the kingdom representation was taken from them and given to another (eg. New Testament congregation, the church).
These were the nations that came against Jerusalem, as Christ this Prince, was delivered to the Gentiles for crucifixion
by His own people. This language of delivering to the Gentiles is not coincidental, as it illustrates His people were working as Gentiles against their own Prince.
Gentiles simply means anyone not a Jew, an alien or foreigner from Israel. Anyone who is not the true Jews or children of God are
spiritually Gentiles (Revelation 3:9) and at war in Jerusalem. Just like you and I were BEFORE we were born again! We were spiritually Gentiles before we become spiritually Jews in Christ! Doesn't matter if you say you are a Jew by bloodline, you are not one in God's eyes. There was no "physical war going on in Jerusalem" when Christ came, so why do you think God prophesied Christ's coming to end Jerusalem's "warfare" (Isiah 40:1-2) and to bring comfort to her? What warfare is it, exactly? These are questions that many teachers ignore because it illustrates vividly that the Lord spoke this way. While they want to keep holding to an idea that understanding city spiritually is of men rather than of God. But the Biblical fact is, she
indeed was at war, but not warfare as the world defines it (with guns and missiles), but as God's word does. Not by all the literal/physical nations battling against her as the world defines it, but as God does. Two different generations or families, one the messengers and children of Satan v.s. the other the messengers or children of God, at war. The war of WORDS! Even as Revelation 12 also depicts. The end result was that Christ came to the mount of Olives (signifying the anointed kingdom), came to Jerusalem as King, freed the children held in spiritual captivity, in bondage of Satan and his minions, and judged those who fought against Him. Not in your worldly vision of Premillennialists terms, but spiritual!
Zechariah 12:89
- "In that day shall the LORD defend the inhabitants of Jerusalem; and he that is feeble among them at that day shall be as David; and the house of David shall be as God, as the angel of the LORD before them.
- And it shall come to pass in that day, that I will seek to destroy all the nations that come against Jerusalem.
- And I will pour upon the house of David, and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the spirit of grace and of supplications: and they shall look upon me whom they have pierced, and they shall mourn for him, as one mourneth for his only son, and shall be in bitterness for him, as one that is in bitterness for his firstborn."
The only real question is, when Christ poured out His Spirit of grace upon the house of David (Pentecost), how was Jerusalem under siege by all the nations, and how did God seek to destroy all the nations that came against Jerusalem? When you answer that question
honestly, you know that this never spoke of a physical/literal war or nations!! The Lord did defend the inhabitants of Jerusalem and did destroy the nations that came up against her and He did pour out His spirit upon the house of David, and they did look upon Him whom they had pierced. Could it be anymore clearer?!? It is Done! Christ accomplished this at the cross!! And they did mourn for Him as one mourns for his only son, as also confirmed yet again in John 19.
John 19:36-37
- "For these things were done, that the scripture should be fulfilled, A bone of him shall not be broken.
- And again another scripture saith, They shall look on him whom they pierced."
It's not scripture yet to be fulfilled, it's Scripture already fulfilled! We just need to take God's word as authoritative, rather than listen to the self-serving denials of men snared in Premillennial/Judaism/Zionism that you are digging yourself into! Sad.